Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

What is your stock turbo X hp/tq?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 8, 2010, 11:22 PM
  #1  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
HAHAV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is your stock turbo X hp/tq?

Just wanted to see what you guys are making on the stock turbo, please post all your engine mods, boost, fuel, and what type of dyno and your tuner.

Saw this is the "other" Evo dyno thread, and the X section does not have one...that I found

Thanks
Old Nov 9, 2010, 07:04 PM
  #2  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
HAHAV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow not one post. The 1-9 forum has a huge thread on this.
Old Nov 9, 2010, 07:27 PM
  #3  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
wrxnevox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: VA
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Friend on mine with stock turbo,turboback exhaust,intake,uicp,licp,intercooler,mbc and its tune and he made like 350whp/and about 340tq
Old Nov 9, 2010, 07:35 PM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
SiliconTek's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Autocrossing Somewhere
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, the X crowd is all about who has a bigger wallet. You won't find many happy with the stocker or many that stayed with it long. I personally like it, at 1.09 CF I am at ~360hp/350tq, 25psi.
Old Nov 9, 2010, 08:17 PM
  #5  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
murlo26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SiliconTek
Yeah, the X crowd is all about who has a bigger wallet. You won't find many happy with the stocker or many that stayed with it long. I personally like it, at 1.09 CF I am at ~360hp/350tq, 25psi.
Not totally true...here is my setup on my stock turbo, i miss the simplicity for sure.

Just had UR test pipe, Buschur bullet catback, AMS intake and UICP and injectors/wally 255...I did have mx1 cams but my tuner said they didn't do **** for power at all...OH and E85 of course, actually E70 on this dyno day.

Name:  Mapdynoday.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  114.9 KB

This wasn't running the greatest that day either, I was over 400whp/400wtq for sure on a good day.
Old Nov 9, 2010, 08:25 PM
  #6  
Newbie
 
jojobanks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Jacksonville AL
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ended up with around 320whp and about 330wtq. AEM CAI, buschur racing cat-back, HKS upper intercooler pipe/lower intercooler pipe. Should be a little higher once I get my december enlistment bonus and get a stronger clutch, downpipe/testpipe, and intercooler
Old Nov 9, 2010, 08:38 PM
  #7  
Newbie
 
Pushn'lbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: FL
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
361whp 389wtq. 93, basic bolt ons. 30psi boost spike.
Old Nov 9, 2010, 08:51 PM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
awddyno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tuned a few of these but one stood out.
800cc, walbro, e85, BR Fmic, magnaflow exhaust with high flow cat, stock intake with drop in filter. Upgraded downpipe, ams upper pipe I think.
373whp 403 wtq on my mustang dyno. My stock Evo X was 222 on the same dyno.
Old Nov 9, 2010, 09:23 PM
  #9  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
HAHAV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sweet guys, any reason why someone mentioned nobody likes the stock turbo and X owners have fat wallets, cause if I recal correctly at one point Evo 8s, and 9s cost the same price and there are plenty of guys running the stock turbo and see good results. The X seems pretty strong with bolt-ons, I wonder if low 12s are possible with bolt-ons or even high 11s, any input on this?
Old Nov 9, 2010, 10:03 PM
  #10  
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
evoxgsr2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Terrell, TX
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
330whp/349wtq on Cobb Tuning Plano's dyno.

TBE, AMS Intake and IC Piping (No FMIC), and OTS Stg 2 Accessport Tune
Old Nov 10, 2010, 07:20 AM
  #11  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
rmondoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Grapevine, TX
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mods:
AMS FMIC, UICP, LICP, Intake
Megan testpipe
Specialty-X catback
GrimmSpeed 3port

Actual Dyno numbers on Cobb Tuning Plano's Mustang Dyno:
Cobb Stage2 93oct Protune: 343hp 358tq 26psi

Old Nov 10, 2010, 09:18 AM
  #12  
Rnm
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Rnm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HAHAV8
Sweet guys, any reason why someone mentioned nobody likes the stock turbo and X owners have fat wallets, cause if I recal correctly at one point Evo 8s, and 9s cost the same price and there are plenty of guys running the stock turbo and see good results. The X seems pretty strong with bolt-ons, I wonder if low 12s are possible with bolt-ons or even high 11s, any input on this?
It's because the stock turbo on the 8 and 9's can be pushed a bit further especially on E85. Couple that with less weight to boot makes them fun on the street. When I get my X, I won't even bother trying to max out the stock turbo.
Old Nov 10, 2010, 09:23 AM
  #13  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
murlo26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Rnm
It's because the stock turbo on the 8 and 9's can be pushed a bit further especially on E85. Couple that with less weight to boot makes them fun on the street. When I get my X, I won't even bother trying to max out the stock turbo.
Yep, the X is a pig, needs more power to be same level of fun.
Old Nov 10, 2010, 09:36 AM
  #14  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
HAHAV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I see, when I get mine I'm looking for like 350whp on a dynojet with similar mods to rmondoh a few posts up, either way will be about 50 more whp than my STI but also an extra 170 pounds
Old Nov 10, 2010, 09:37 AM
  #15  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
murlo26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
170lbs isn't that much, 50whp and better low end on the X will make the car feel much faster.


Quick Reply: What is your stock turbo X hp/tq?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:48 PM.