What is your stock turbo X hp/tq?
#1
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What is your stock turbo X hp/tq?
Just wanted to see what you guys are making on the stock turbo, please post all your engine mods, boost, fuel, and what type of dyno and your tuner.
Saw this is the "other" Evo dyno thread, and the X section does not have one...that I found
Thanks
Saw this is the "other" Evo dyno thread, and the X section does not have one...that I found
Thanks
#4
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Autocrossing Somewhere
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, the X crowd is all about who has a bigger wallet. You won't find many happy with the stocker or many that stayed with it long. I personally like it, at 1.09 CF I am at ~360hp/350tq, 25psi.
#5
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
Just had UR test pipe, Buschur bullet catback, AMS intake and UICP and injectors/wally 255...I did have mx1 cams but my tuner said they didn't do **** for power at all...OH and E85 of course, actually E70 on this dyno day.
This wasn't running the greatest that day either, I was over 400whp/400wtq for sure on a good day.
#6
ended up with around 320whp and about 330wtq. AEM CAI, buschur racing cat-back, HKS upper intercooler pipe/lower intercooler pipe. Should be a little higher once I get my december enlistment bonus and get a stronger clutch, downpipe/testpipe, and intercooler
Trending Topics
#8
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tuned a few of these but one stood out.
800cc, walbro, e85, BR Fmic, magnaflow exhaust with high flow cat, stock intake with drop in filter. Upgraded downpipe, ams upper pipe I think.
373whp 403 wtq on my mustang dyno. My stock Evo X was 222 on the same dyno.
800cc, walbro, e85, BR Fmic, magnaflow exhaust with high flow cat, stock intake with drop in filter. Upgraded downpipe, ams upper pipe I think.
373whp 403 wtq on my mustang dyno. My stock Evo X was 222 on the same dyno.
#9
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sweet guys, any reason why someone mentioned nobody likes the stock turbo and X owners have fat wallets, cause if I recal correctly at one point Evo 8s, and 9s cost the same price and there are plenty of guys running the stock turbo and see good results. The X seems pretty strong with bolt-ons, I wonder if low 12s are possible with bolt-ons or even high 11s, any input on this?
#11
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Grapevine, TX
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mods:
AMS FMIC, UICP, LICP, Intake
Megan testpipe
Specialty-X catback
GrimmSpeed 3port
Actual Dyno numbers on Cobb Tuning Plano's Mustang Dyno:
Cobb Stage2 93oct Protune: 343hp 358tq 26psi
AMS FMIC, UICP, LICP, Intake
Megan testpipe
Specialty-X catback
GrimmSpeed 3port
Actual Dyno numbers on Cobb Tuning Plano's Mustang Dyno:
Cobb Stage2 93oct Protune: 343hp 358tq 26psi
#12
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
Sweet guys, any reason why someone mentioned nobody likes the stock turbo and X owners have fat wallets, cause if I recal correctly at one point Evo 8s, and 9s cost the same price and there are plenty of guys running the stock turbo and see good results. The X seems pretty strong with bolt-ons, I wonder if low 12s are possible with bolt-ons or even high 11s, any input on this?
#14
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I see, when I get mine I'm looking for like 350whp on a dynojet with similar mods to rmondoh a few posts up, either way will be about 50 more whp than my STI but also an extra 170 pounds