Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Cobb Tuning + MAPerformance = Dyno Proven Gains!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 17, 2010, 10:42 AM
  #16  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
 
ChrisCarey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Plymouth, MN
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by sti-06
9whp and 5wtq gain for $500 plus PITA install = NO THANKS!

Other than that awesome gains..
$369.99 shipped actually And there's no denying that the biggest gains with this upgrade will be on E85 cars or those with turbo upgrades. Also, you're only looking at peak gains, that chunk between 4500-6000 the gains appear to be even greater and I'd be willing bet that's what Kracka is feeling when he is giddy with excitement lol.
Old Nov 17, 2010, 01:18 PM
  #17  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
EvoX-11's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChrisCarey
$369.99 shipped actually And there's no denying that the biggest gains with this upgrade will be on E85 cars or those with turbo upgrades. Also, you're only looking at peak gains, that chunk between 4500-6000 the gains appear to be even greater and I'd be willing bet that's what Kracka is feeling when he is giddy with excitement lol.
$369 is not bad but there is still that PITA install
Old Nov 17, 2010, 01:34 PM
  #18  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (98)
 
Vivid Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 4,260
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Nice gains my friend. Your boys do good work.
Old Nov 17, 2010, 02:03 PM
  #19  
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
wtfisak24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: World
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
worth the hp gain for 370 shipped lol
Old Nov 17, 2010, 02:21 PM
  #20  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
rmondoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Grapevine, TX
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChrisCarey
Didn't AMS already test this and find that the gains were in the O2 housing? Either way I'm very happy with the gains from our piece on stock turbo and pump gas
Yeah and that's why this is all confusing. AMS retains a "stock looking" o2 housing with a 3" pipe after and claims gains from it. You guys at MAP have an o2 eliminator divorced design with 3" pipe after it and it made good gains. Cobb's downpipe REUSES the stock o2 housing and they claim to get improved HP and TQ by simply having a 3" downpipe. The guys at Cobb Plano really stand behind their product and given the gains Kracka got with MAP's pipe...I "could" see the gain coming from just going to a bigger diameter downpipe but no one knows. I'm sure it will provide gains...but how much is the question.

Oh and don't get me wrong. I'm totally thrilled at the gains we saw on Kracka's car with the MAP o2/dp. It is a very finely constructed piece. (except for the stock o2 sensor location, lol )

Originally Posted by Kracka
Yup, AMS claims zero gains from a 3" downpipe alone (I believe Buschur backed them up as well). I tend to lean towards AMS' opinion on this one, but I really want to do the test Rmondoh is discussing so I have real dyno proof for my own eyes. The more hard data we all have the better it is for everyone.
Yeah I'm with Kracka. I'm curious myself as to what the results will say. As he said, you can't argue with cold, hard facts and we'd like to get to the bottom of this. Plus I'm sure Cobb would love the results of the test if their research proves to be true. I'm excited to find out....just need to get in touch with Cobb.
Old Nov 18, 2010, 03:49 PM
  #21  
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
JMSxCZ4A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Very nice comparo post Kracka, Congrats on the numbers!
Old Nov 19, 2010, 07:56 AM
  #22  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
murlo26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
AMS' "stock like" housing is nothing like a stock housing. I don't think you realize how much bigger it is.
Old Nov 19, 2010, 07:59 AM
  #23  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (49)
 
Kracka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Prosper, TX
Posts: 8,970
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by murlo26
AMS' "stock like" housing is nothing like a stock housing. I don't think you realize how much bigger it is.
Stock like as in a bell-mouth design like most aftermarket Subaru downpipes use.
Old Nov 19, 2010, 07:59 AM
  #24  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
rmondoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Grapevine, TX
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by murlo26
AMS' "stock like" housing is nothing like a stock housing. I don't think you realize how much bigger it is.
That wasn't my point. My point was that it's the same design: Bellmouth, non-divorced. I realize it's bigger. I was simply pointing out the different design approaches.
Old Nov 19, 2010, 08:01 AM
  #25  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
murlo26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Kracka
Stock like as in a bell-mouth design like most aftermarket Subaru downpipes use.
Right, I get that, it just seemed he was trying to say that the gains from the AMS piece would be solely from the 3" pipe after the housing, which there is just no way.

Multiple people have tested the cobb downpipe, I wouldn't waste your time, we know there are no gains there or very very minimal.

Stick with the MAP one or if you want a cast piece the AMS one
Old Nov 19, 2010, 08:03 AM
  #26  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
rmondoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Grapevine, TX
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^Oooooh interesting. Do you have links to those tests. I'd be interested in having more info before I decide on actually doing it.
Old Nov 19, 2010, 10:52 AM
  #27  
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
alqubaisi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: colorado
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice gains ^_^ ..
Old Oct 16, 2012, 06:44 PM
  #28  
Newbie
 
Thatotherguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone know where to find a dyno chart for stock down pipe plus e85 vs after market down pipe with integrated o2 on e85?
Old Oct 17, 2012, 11:59 PM
  #29  
Newbie
 
geoxrge_gsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: orange county
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
dang hopefully i hit that, i have ETS intake, ets ICP's, MAP 02 dump, ams testpipe, inivida n1 exhaust, just waiting for my tune money to install them haha.
Old Oct 18, 2012, 05:53 AM
  #30  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (49)
 
Kracka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Prosper, TX
Posts: 8,970
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Thatotherguy
Does anyone know where to find a dyno chart for stock down pipe plus e85 vs after market down pipe with integrated o2 on e85?
On the stock turbo the results won't be a whole lot different than my results.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Freebs
Evo X Dyno Results
13
May 4, 2015 07:47 PM
Kracka
Vendor Service / Parts / Tuning Review
12
May 13, 2013 03:58 AM
Kracka
Evo X Dyno Results
295
Oct 3, 2012 03:03 PM
Supraboy1
Evo X Dyno Results
21
Sep 15, 2011 03:35 PM
Bob W.
Evo X Dyno Results
7
Mar 30, 2010 12:33 PM



Quick Reply: Cobb Tuning + MAPerformance = Dyno Proven Gains!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:52 PM.