AMS 2.3l ID1600cc's 900x-91 Octane Results!

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 10, 2011, 06:34 AM

#16

murlo26

Evolved Member

iTrader: (9)

Join Date: Aug 2008

Location: Minnesota

Posts: 4,119

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

I'd guess 92mm...

Reply Like

Mar 10, 2011, 08:14 AM

#17

palmerblock

Evolving Member

Join Date: May 2008

Location: Long Beach, CA

Posts: 138

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

92, wow, how thin is it it between the cylinders?
if its a 90mm, by 86mm, then the displacement is 2188cc's

Reply Like

Mar 10, 2011, 08:34 AM

#18

murlo26

Evolved Member

iTrader: (9)

Join Date: Aug 2008

Location: Minnesota

Posts: 4,119

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

I meant to say 94 actually...but who knows. I doubt it's exactly 2.3l.

Reply Like

Mar 10, 2011, 09:51 AM

#19

futurevowner

Evolved Member

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Jul 2006

Location: Jersey

Posts: 617

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by Magnumpsi

I didnt mean stroker. Generally when I write 2.3l stroker just seems to follow. This is done in bore and what allows us to be able to rev the motor out to 9500RPM.

Mitch

Is there any reason the motor wasn't revved out that high? It looks like it would have continued to make power.

Reply Like

Mar 10, 2011, 07:22 PM

#20

scheides

iTrader: (10)

Join Date: Oct 2006

Location: Minneapolis

Posts: 4,827

Likes: 0

Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by futurevowner

Is there any reason the motor wasn't revved out that high? It looks like it would have continued to make power.

+1, rev that bish!

Reply Like

Mar 10, 2011, 07:59 PM

#21

bimmer8181

Newbie

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Feb 2011

Location: los angeles

Posts: 52

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Very linear power band. Looks great.

Reply Like

Mar 11, 2011, 06:00 AM

#22

Magnumpsi

Evolved Member

Thread Starter

iTrader: (2)

Join Date: Aug 2005

Location: Who Knows

Posts: 1,045

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

It would have made more power for sure if we revved it out but for pump gas the customer wanted to have a more mild setup. This is as mild as it gets lol.

I would guess that it would make 530-540 hp revving out. Solid power band for sure.

Thanks,

Mitch

Reply Like

Mar 11, 2011, 08:12 AM

#23

TheNEWB

Evolving Member

Join Date: Jul 2009

Location: Canada

Posts: 222

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by Magnumpsi

What bore is that and what pistons did you use?

NEWB

Reply Like

Mar 13, 2011, 05:17 PM

#24

whitecomet

Evolving Member

Join Date: Sep 2007

Location: Willougby ohio

Posts: 110

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Time to go e85. There is so much power left on the table it's sick I bet there is at least diff destroying hp. But even as it stands you have a monsta and congrats.