Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Kracka's MAP EF2X turbo dyno results - 416WHP on pump gas!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 09:06 AM
  #181  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
^Yea I didn't think his supporting list was "weak" really, lol. And on E85 you don't need as much to max turbos out, just need moar boost.
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 09:16 AM
  #182  
ChrisCarey's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 3
From: Plymouth, MN
Well I'm sure the stock intercooler and piping wasn't helping lol
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 09:24 AM
  #183  
HappyMint's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Originally Posted by murlo26
I don't think anyone has said the EF2 makes more top end and I would be surprised to hear people think that.

The FPgreen is a bigger turbo, its laggier and has more top end. The EF2 for a quick response turbo has most of the bang for less lag.

The stock frame turbo world is simple...if you want more power you get more lag. I haven't seen much at all to show that people can magically make more power with one vs another without sacrificing something. It's all about balance in the stock frame world imo.
Lol for gods sakes guys. I quoted the guy who said the EF2 was making more top end than the green. I wasn't saying Kracka, or anyone else, said or thought that.
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 09:25 AM
  #184  
Kracka's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
I <3 the internet
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 03:02 PM
  #185  
Zerofour1223's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: WA
Originally Posted by scheides
I put off some of these supporting mods when I did my BBX because I wanted to keep my car as simple as possible...long story short I never saw the numbers out of it I wanted until I had a bigger fmic, pipes, and manifold done.
What kind of numbers did you see on the BBX Lite after the supporting bolt ons were added? I'm torn between the EF2 and the BBX. If you have a build thread I'd love to check it out!

Kracka that power curve and spool up looks amazing Looks like the EF2 is treating you great.
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 03:15 PM
  #186  
HAHAV8's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
From: NY
Originally Posted by Zerofour1223
What kind of numbers did you see on the BBX Lite after the supporting bolt ons were added? I'm torn between the EF2 and the BBX. If you have a build thread I'd love to check it out!

Kracka that power curve and spool up looks amazing Looks like the EF2 is treating you great.
I was having the same debate, between the Lite and EF2. I'm going to be purchasing the EF2; it spools nicer, and makes similar top-end power. I'll take a little less top-end power, in exchange for near stock spool.

The EF2 seems to be making a solid 60-80 more WTQ at 3k vs the BBX-Lite and its top-end gains are very similar, and in some cases better. I also think that has a little to do with Kracka's porting, but regardless they should be very close.
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 05:06 PM
  #187  
jyamona's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
From: Northeast PA
Originally Posted by HAHAV8
I was having the same debate, between the Lite and EF2. I'm going to be purchasing the EF2; it spools nicer, and makes similar top-end power. I'll take a little less top-end power, in exchange for near stock spool.

The EF2 seems to be making a solid 60-80 more WTQ at 3k vs the BBX-Lite and its top-end gains are very similar, and in some cases better. I also think that has a little to do with Kracka's porting, but regardless they should be very close.

I don't really understand why people are so concerned with figures like that. That wtq at 3k rpm is achieved by flooring the car at 2k rpms. Why the hell would you ever do that on the street? Downshift into 2nd
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 07:49 PM
  #188  
discogodfather's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 51
Likes: 1
From: San Francisco, CA
^Figures like that determine response on the street and in DD. It's all good to say things like "just downshift" and wait for the power but that's a mindset for the track. When your merging on the freeway you want the power to come in as soon as possible. I can't drive around at 4000 rpm in heavy traffic all the time.

Most turbos on the market are just marketing driven peak number deals, the ultimate turbo for the street is determined by it's general performance curve.
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 08:47 PM
  #189  
rmondoh's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Grapevine, TX
Originally Posted by Zerofour1223
What kind of numbers did you see on the BBX Lite after the supporting bolt ons were added? I'm torn between the EF2 and the BBX. If you have a build thread I'd love to check it out!
Keep in mind that Scheides has a BBX, not a BBX Lite. The BBX is more in line with an EF3 I believe.
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 08:55 PM
  #190  
rmondoh's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Grapevine, TX
Originally Posted by discogodfather
^Figures like that determine response on the street and in DD. It's all good to say things like "just downshift" and wait for the power but that's a mindset for the track. When your merging on the freeway you want the power to come in as soon as possible. I can't drive around at 4000 rpm in heavy traffic all the time.

Most turbos on the market are just marketing driven peak number deals, the ultimate turbo for the street is determined by it's general performance curve.
^This is very true. I've driven Kracka's car after he got the EF2 installed and I'm more than impressed with how responsive that turbo is.
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 09:23 PM
  #191  
Zerofour1223's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: WA
Originally Posted by HAHAV8
I was having the same debate, between the Lite and EF2. I'm going to be purchasing the EF2; it spools nicer, and makes similar top-end power. I'll take a little less top-end power, in exchange for near stock spool.

The EF2 seems to be making a solid 60-80 more WTQ at 3k vs the BBX-Lite and its top-end gains are very similar, and in some cases better. I also think that has a little to do with Kracka's porting, but regardless they should be very close.
Im with you on prioritizing spool over peak #s, was that compared to a ported Lite? I'm starting to lean more towards the EF2 as well because you can get the compressor housing and turbine housing ported, as well as a thermal coating for the same price as the ported Lite. Well 80 dollars more but basically the same price.

Originally Posted by rmondoh
Keep in mind that Scheides has a BBX, not a BBX Lite. The BBX is more in line with an EF3 I believe.
Ah thanks, I thought he had the Lite, and yes your right that'd be more in line with the EF3

Last edited by Zerofour1223; Dec 30, 2011 at 09:33 PM.
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 11:46 PM
  #192  
HAHAV8's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
From: NY
Originally Posted by jyamona
I don't really understand why people are so concerned with figures like that. That wtq at 3k rpm is achieved by flooring the car at 2k rpms. Why the hell would you ever do that on the street? Downshift into 2nd

Like mentioned before, I like to keep it as streetable as possible. I don't want to have to downshift everytime I feel the need to pass on the highway in 5th, I like how I can lean into a bit and that 280 ft-lbs gets me easily past another car. Since 3k is what I'm normally cruising at its nice to have the power on command. Not to mention in traffic if you ever need to avoid someone from hitting you, you'll easily have the power on tap to get out of the way.

Plus why want more lag for nearly the same top-end, doesn't make sense to me for a car that will be on the street 99% of its life.
Old Dec 31, 2011 | 02:44 AM
  #193  
scheides's Avatar
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 12
From: Minneapolis
Originally Posted by Zerofour1223
What kind of numbers did you see on the BBX Lite after the supporting bolt ons were added? I'm torn between the EF2 and the BBX. If you have a build thread I'd love to check it out!

Kracka that power curve and spool up looks amazing Looks like the EF2 is treating you great.

As rmondo stated, I have the BBX not BBX Lite. IMHO If you are on stock block and intend to stay that way the BBX Lite or EF2 are the turbos to get. Search for posts by me in the dyno section here to see gains I've had at various stages, I won't clutter this thread.
Old Dec 31, 2011 | 02:50 AM
  #194  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by scheides
As rmondo stated, I have the BBX not BBX Lite. IMHO If you are on stock block and intend to stay that way the BBX Lite or EF2 are the turbos to get. Search for posts by me in the dyno section here to see gains I've had at various stages, I won't clutter this thread.
Aren't you supposed to be on call right now?
Old Dec 31, 2011 | 09:54 AM
  #195  
scheides's Avatar
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 12
From: Minneapolis
Originally Posted by murlo26
Aren't you supposed to be on call right now?
Why do you think I was posting at 4am? :P

Know what would be fun? E85 ralliart with an EF2X. Hrm.....


Quick Reply: Kracka's MAP EF2X turbo dyno results - 416WHP on pump gas!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:03 AM.