ETS 6266, Cobb Built Car, 724whp
May 23, 2012, 08:41 AM
#61
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As PRS posted, my fuel setup is listed in the first post. I have a modified 044 pump, and it is more than enough on pump gas and c16. If I was on e85, I would need two pumps or a larger single pump.
Also, on the X platform, in-tank double pumpers are worthless, they still have fuel starvation issues. Which is why I have the fuel cell setup - no starve in corners.
Also, on the X platform, in-tank double pumpers are worthless, they still have fuel starvation issues. Which is why I have the fuel cell setup - no starve in corners.
May 23, 2012, 08:55 AM
#62
As PRS posted, my fuel setup is listed in the first post. I have a modified 044 pump, and it is more than enough on pump gas and c16. If I was on e85, I would need two pumps or a larger single pump.
Also, on the X platform, in-tank double pumpers are worthless, they still have fuel starvation issues. Which is why I have the fuel cell setup - no starve in corners.
Also, on the X platform, in-tank double pumpers are worthless, they still have fuel starvation issues. Which is why I have the fuel cell setup - no starve in corners.
For road racing yes!, I just did a 6266 With double pumper and no issues.
The extra volume the double pumper supplies when making over 500WHP on our dyno is needed. I wont tune one above 500WHP without. As i have seen issues with fuel pressure above that.
Since your using a fuel cell with a 044 on c16 your in a better position.
Injectors spray what you supply it with. Keep nice pressure at the inlet and be safer.
Weight out the alternative of going lean...........
May 23, 2012, 04:18 PM
#70
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Road racing = road course aka track racing. I don't race on public streets anymore vic :-)
it'd be worse for driving normally on public roads, and on the race tracks, the extra lag would just give me less rpms to work with, and if I ever dropped out of boost it sucks ***** to have a 150hp engine lol
it'd be worse for driving normally on public roads, and on the race tracks, the extra lag would just give me less rpms to work with, and if I ever dropped out of boost it sucks ***** to have a 150hp engine lol
May 23, 2012, 08:13 PM
#72
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Was there this weekend. Turning 1.25s on 24psi 500whp map. Not too bad. 1.7 cw
No idea what it would have done with higher boost or c16. Wanted to take it easy this time out :-)
No idea what it would have done with higher boost or c16. Wanted to take it easy this time out :-)
