MAP EF2.5 tuned by Cobb Tuning - Plano
#61
hello Kracka
there's a map ef2.5 group sale, I'm thinking on getting on that list. I live close to cobb tunning in plano. Just wondering how is your car holding up with that much torque? Do I need to upgrade my stock fuel system to attain 400whp/340tq? I already have all suporting mods,injen intake, ams TP, ams single exhaust, and ets 3.5 intercooler. Could I just replace the turbo myself and drive to plano for a tuning staying out of boost Im about 25 miles away? thanks.
there's a map ef2.5 group sale, I'm thinking on getting on that list. I live close to cobb tunning in plano. Just wondering how is your car holding up with that much torque? Do I need to upgrade my stock fuel system to attain 400whp/340tq? I already have all suporting mods,injen intake, ams TP, ams single exhaust, and ets 3.5 intercooler. Could I just replace the turbo myself and drive to plano for a tuning staying out of boost Im about 25 miles away? thanks.
#62
there's a map ef2.5 group sale, I'm thinking on getting on that list. I live close to cobb tunning in plano. Just wondering how is your car holding up with that much torque? Do I need to upgrade my stock fuel system to attain 400whp/340tq? I already have all suporting mods,injen intake, ams TP, ams single exhaust, and ets 3.5 intercooler. Could I just replace the turbo myself and drive to plano for a tuning staying out of boost Im about 25 miles away? thanks.
#63
Here are my latest results, these are with the standard 3" compressor cover rather than the 3" anti-surge cover. This seems to be the winning setup if you ask me; 200 RPM quicker spool, better response, more torque, nearly identical horsepower, and of course one less option to pay for
Driving impressions are great! No surge issues could be felt and it drove very nicely. Initial impressions are it drives just as smooth as the anti-surge version, but give me another few days to truly experience the turbo in more scenarios. Oddly enough, turbo intake noise is slightly more with the standard cover than with the anti-surge version.
My final verdict: Standard cover is the way to order this turbo. Save yourself a few bucks and enjoy the quicker spool/response times!
Driving impressions are great! No surge issues could be felt and it drove very nicely. Initial impressions are it drives just as smooth as the anti-surge version, but give me another few days to truly experience the turbo in more scenarios. Oddly enough, turbo intake noise is slightly more with the standard cover than with the anti-surge version.
My final verdict: Standard cover is the way to order this turbo. Save yourself a few bucks and enjoy the quicker spool/response times!
#66
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
interesting the cover made that much difference.
were dyno temps similar?
retune would leave me a skeptic. always possible to find new power. and this type of change simply put should not need a retune. a no retune back to back would be more accurate.
so if data is true me thoughts on bullet hole cover are even worse. slows spool and does nothing for surge. my own direct no other change swap to a precision bullet cover did not spool slower for me. just didn't stop surge I had.
were dyno temps similar?
retune would leave me a skeptic. always possible to find new power. and this type of change simply put should not need a retune. a no retune back to back would be more accurate.
so if data is true me thoughts on bullet hole cover are even worse. slows spool and does nothing for surge. my own direct no other change swap to a precision bullet cover did not spool slower for me. just didn't stop surge I had.
#67
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
looks like the ef2 was hitting 360tq a full 600rpm sooner. so I would say its far more than just a small loss. I would agree with quote below. but would like to see current overlay which should put ef2 spooling only 400rpm faster and still worthy of quote below.
EF2 all the way based on that chart lol.
I agree I don't think the other cover will do much but it might make the change worth while. It seems the EF2 wheels are a better match and the results above could easily be different temp/weather changes.
So this just appears that the EF2.5 added lag without any payoff
EF2 all the way based on that chart lol.
I agree I don't think the other cover will do much but it might make the change worth while. It seems the EF2 wheels are a better match and the results above could easily be different temp/weather changes.
So this just appears that the EF2.5 added lag without any payoff
#68
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
are you suggesting MAPs turbo design team is a good as the largest turbo manufacture on the planet? not to mention the Robert secret sauce added in...
the one dyno graph from UK on the turbo suggests the turbo is a home run.
The Evo X version we tested gave the best blend of response and top end power of any bolt on turbo I have tried The first graph shows my Evo X completely standard verses the new MHI Billet Turbo: Note that it makes exactly double the power (spooky!) but the low down power & torque is delivered in the same way.
It is also surge free in all gears & very, very responsive.
and here is comparison of mhi to gtx3076 which also has similar wheel size spec as ef2.5 and new mhi
Last edited by 94AWDcoupe; Dec 23, 2012 at 07:46 AM.
#70
interesting the cover made that much difference.
were dyno temps similar?
retune would leave me a skeptic. always possible to find new power. and this type of change simply put should not need a retune. a no retune back to back would be more accurate.
so if data is true me thoughts on bullet hole cover are even worse. slows spool and does nothing for surge. my own direct no other change swap to a precision bullet cover did not spool slower for me. just didn't stop surge I had.
were dyno temps similar?
retune would leave me a skeptic. always possible to find new power. and this type of change simply put should not need a retune. a no retune back to back would be more accurate.
so if data is true me thoughts on bullet hole cover are even worse. slows spool and does nothing for surge. my own direct no other change swap to a precision bullet cover did not spool slower for me. just didn't stop surge I had.
#71
With all three of these turbochargers sitting here I'm willing to toss out the EF2.5 with anti-surge as a no thank you, but the EF2 and EF2.5 w/3" standard cover are both winners, depending on your goals and usage.
#72
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
are you suggesting MAPs turbo design team is a good as the largest turbo manufacture on the planet? not to mention the Robert secret sauce added in...
the one dyno graph from UK on the turbo suggests the turbo is a home run.
The Evo X version we tested gave the best blend of response and top end power of any bolt on turbo I have tried The first graph shows my Evo X completely standard verses the new MHI Billet Turbo: Note that it makes exactly double the power (spooky!) but the low down power & torque is delivered in the same way.
It is also surge free in all gears & very, very responsive.
and here is comparison of mhi to gtx3076 which also has similar wheel size spec as ef2.5 and new mhi
#73
its still only an engine dyno thats flywheel hp, look at an ef4 or black at the flywheel and youd likely see 8-900 hp dyno. ill be more interested in ken-x on the other forums results with that turbo. granted it will be in VD.
#75
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
Just as you're suggesting that Robert's "secret sauce" is a necessary resource for said largest turbo manufacturer? You're also a bit misinformed if you think that our wheel design was done in house We know how our EF2 and EF3 turbos perform in comparison to the FP variations, and based on inducer and exducer specs I'm confident that the EF2.5 is an apples to apples comparison to the new MHI turbo. I'm sure it won't be long before we have some results from a US based outfit and then we can draw our conclusions.