Notices
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums Discuss the major engine management systems.

How can I get more power from a stock car? What timing are you running?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 6, 2009, 07:58 PM
  #16  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
GST Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hayward
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tephra
nice..

so you think HFC is worthwhile? or does the tune bring it back to normallity?
The above before/after test pipe was with a tune, then added test pipe to the tuned car. Then, added boost pill and tuned for pill and test pipe.

I would imagine something like a milspec 100 cell would work well.
Old Jul 6, 2009, 08:09 PM
  #17  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
still +15/+17 isn't bad from just the testpipe...

i still wanna see that boost/afr for that chart thou
Old Jul 6, 2009, 08:24 PM
  #18  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
GST Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hayward
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tephra
still +15/+17 isn't bad from just the testpipe...

i still wanna see that boost/afr for that chart thou
Yea it's pretty inline with what I have seen with the 8/9's at this level of power. At higher power/airflow its exponential.
Old Jul 6, 2009, 08:40 PM
  #19  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
 
LaXGSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: US
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Bryan for showing what you've found! Like tephra, I'd like to see boost/afr...my main question would be: are the gains from being able to run more boost with the test pipe, or are the gains from better airflow with the test pipe? For example, say I'm running 24 psi before test pipe, then I add the test pipe and untuned it runs 25 psi. If I then tune it back down to run 24 psi again, will I still see gains with the test pipe? Thanks!
Old Jul 6, 2009, 08:51 PM
  #20  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
Personally I think the gains come from less restriction in the exhaust WHICH INTERN allows more boost (with the same DC).

In your example, I think if you ran the same boost+afr (after the TP/HFC install) then the power/tq should be the same (within 5 i reckon)
Old Jul 6, 2009, 11:17 PM
  #21  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
nj1266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 3 Posts
I know it is cliche, but the engine is an air pump. The more airflow through it the more power you will make. Put differently, think of a garden hose that has three restiction in it, at the begining of the hose (stock intake), the middle of the hose (stock cams), and the end of the hose (stock exhaust/CAT). Open the water through the hose and the flow sucks. Remove the last restirction (exhaust/CAT) and the water flow improves. Remove the first restriction (stock intake) and the water flow is even better. Remove the middle restriction (stock cams) and the water flow is much much better.

Finally, add a little electric motor (bigger turbo) to pump more water through the hose and you have water coming out of the hose that will clean dirt off your drive way.

So yes, you will make more power with a full TBE with tp. Add an Injen intake while your at it and you will make even more power.
Old Jul 6, 2009, 11:19 PM
  #22  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
but what if the first restriction is the biggest? then removing the middle or last restrictions shouldn't make a difference
Old Jul 6, 2009, 11:21 PM
  #23  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
GST Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hayward
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tephra
but what if the first restriction is the biggest? then removing the middle or last restrictions shouldn't make a difference
The 02 and the downpipe is not a restriction on the stock turbo.
Old Jul 6, 2009, 11:22 PM
  #24  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
yeah - DB was saying that as well...
Old Jul 6, 2009, 11:22 PM
  #25  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
nj1266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by tephra
but what if the first restriction is the biggest? then removing the middle or last restrictions shouldn't make a difference
On a turbo car, the biggest restriction is the last one, ie, the stock exhaust. Turbo cars love to run w/o any exhaust restriction. Just a little side dump pipe from the turbo will do. That is all they need. We obviously cannot do that on the street. But go to a race track and see how there is practically no exhaust to speak of on a turboed race car. Trubo cars hate backpressure.
Old Jul 6, 2009, 11:23 PM
  #26  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
GST Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hayward
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tephra

In your example, I think if you ran the same boost+afr (after the TP/HFC install) then the power/tq should be the same (within 5 i reckon)
Backpressure makes a big difference. More flow, less backpressure can allow more boost up top where before WGDC was 100% and/or knock came into play. Changes in AFR at pump gas level make less power differences than you would think.

EDIT:

Here is some data from the 8/9's:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...-cell-cat.html

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...trate-cat.html

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...st-system.html

Last edited by GST Motorsports; Jul 6, 2009 at 11:29 PM.
Old Jul 6, 2009, 11:42 PM
  #27  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
nj - yeah I know, but parts what about parts WITHIN the exhaust

bryan - yeah so the TP allowed more boost (or better boost efficiency) which explains to gain in power.

nice data btw!
Old Jul 7, 2009, 01:54 AM
  #28  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
gunzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tephra
nj - yeah I know, but parts what about parts WITHIN the exhaust

bryan - yeah so the TP allowed more boost (or better boost efficiency) which explains to gain in power.

nice data btw!
If you're referring to the flapper valve like those on the 8/9's .. get rid of it .

You can cap the boost to that similiar to before the TP .. you still end up with higher torque once you install the TP ..

I do not know how the O2 will react .. but I can tell you .. the downpipe is probably a waste of time and $$ ..
Old Jul 7, 2009, 06:15 AM
  #29  
Evolved Member
 
crcain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by GST Motorsports
The 02 and the downpipe is not a restriction on the stock turbo.
Is the Evo X turbo elbow and downpipe larger than previous Evos?

I would have though adding a test pipe would decrease back pressure, increase VE, and actually make it harder to hit a target boost because the motor is breathing more freely (less resistance to make the manifold pressure).

However, less back pressure means less force availablt to push open the internal gate as well and overwhelm the actuator. Hmmm.
Old Jul 7, 2009, 08:33 AM
  #30  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
 
LaXGSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: US
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GST Motorsports
Backpressure makes a big difference. More flow, less backpressure can allow more boost up top where before WGDC was 100% and/or knock came into play. Changes in AFR at pump gas level make less power differences than you would think.
Bryan, I think THIS part is critical to what I was trying to understand...currently, my WGDC is not maxed out at 100%, but what you're saying is that having more flow (ie, with a test pipe) will allow me to run more boost without knock. That could also potentially allow me to run more timing up top right? My main concerns with running too high of a boost level have to do with turbo efficiencies - at some point, it's just spitting out hot air Anyone have a stock turbo compressor map?


Quick Reply: How can I get more power from a stock car? What timing are you running?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:20 AM.