reading octane in evoscan along with other questions.
#18
It depends, if it shows around -10% for idle too, then it should be a simple subtract 10% from your entire maf scaling maps. If not, then you have to log and rescale in each voltage range which would be a time consuming process.
#19
You more than likely do not need to adjust the BTEL maps but it wouldn't hurt to raise them to the desired loads you want to run.
What intake are you running and how did you scale your MAF? Did you have a shop do it for you? If so, you might want to have them re-do it since it's really not an easy process unless everything is just 10% higher than it's suppose to be.
What intake are you running and how did you scale your MAF? Did you have a shop do it for you? If so, you might want to have them re-do it since it's really not an easy process unless everything is just 10% higher than it's suppose to be.
#20
You more than likely do not need to adjust the BTEL maps but it wouldn't hurt to raise them to the desired loads you want to run.
What intake are you running and how did you scale your MAF? Did you have a shop do it for you? If so, you might want to have them re-do it since it's really not an easy process unless everything is just 10% higher than it's suppose to be.
What intake are you running and how did you scale your MAF? Did you have a shop do it for you? If so, you might want to have them re-do it since it's really not an easy process unless everything is just 10% higher than it's suppose to be.
so i guess what would my next step be? try to rescale the maf? im willing to put in the effort and time if its necessary.
Is it bad to be running up to the load cells i am with the boost im running?
thanks again for all the help
EDIT:
I dunno if this would play a roll into anything but i was going over evoscan, and i noticed my injector scaling was at 523, not 532 like my ROM says....
I know i should go out and try, but im in bed and not getting out lol.
so if someone chimes in before morning, i would be much obliged
night fellas
Last edited by storm_trooper; Apr 3, 2010 at 11:45 PM.
#22
Once your trims are good, you'll have to recheck your timing & fuel maps since you'll be hitting different load cells now.
Injector scaling setting in Evoscan should not have any adverse effects in your logs.
#23
10-4!!!
Thanks SiC, I'm actually on the road now and decreased my maf scale 10% and my ideal creeped back to -12.5% :-/. Should I go down an other 10%?
It's only been about 20 minuets or so since I reset the ecu so if anything changes I'll let you know.
Arigato !
Thanks SiC, I'm actually on the road now and decreased my maf scale 10% and my ideal creeped back to -12.5% :-/. Should I go down an other 10%?
It's only been about 20 minuets or so since I reset the ecu so if anything changes I'll let you know.
Arigato !
#24
+-12.5% is maximum for fuel trims so I guess your idle trim was way off the chart, this was what I was affraid of. It might be best to start from scratch with the stock MAF scaling maps and adjust it to your own setup in your case.
#25
well the thing was, stock scaling was throwing my LTFT Cruise at +12.5% and giving me the system to lean code, and also my car was knocking 10-20 counts during WOT in fourth.
then I moved to the current scaling and my LTFT cruise went way down and into the negative. and now after taking 10% off the whole band of trim's im at +4% on my LTFT
so i dunno... the LTFT cruise is what really affects your WOT performance and cause the car to throw the p0171.
then I moved to the current scaling and my LTFT cruise went way down and into the negative. and now after taking 10% off the whole band of trim's im at +4% on my LTFT
so i dunno... the LTFT cruise is what really affects your WOT performance and cause the car to throw the p0171.
#26
well the thing was, stock scaling was throwing my LTFT Cruise at +12.5% and giving me the system to lean code, and also my car was knocking 10-20 counts during WOT in fourth.
then I moved to the current scaling and my LTFT cruise went way down and into the negative. and now after taking 10% off the whole band of trim's im at +4% on my LTFT
so i dunno... the LTFT cruise is what really affects your WOT performance and cause the car to throw the p0171.
then I moved to the current scaling and my LTFT cruise went way down and into the negative. and now after taking 10% off the whole band of trim's im at +4% on my LTFT
so i dunno... the LTFT cruise is what really affects your WOT performance and cause the car to throw the p0171.
Having the LTFT_idle pegged at -12.5% inorder to get the LTFT_cruise at 4% is not good practice. Your car will be spitting fuel at idle with your ECU unable to correct the rich condition. If your idle trim is pegged max negative, that will also trigger a CEL. It is P0172 (i think), system too rich. The car will waste gas and FE will suck big time.
Go back to the stock intake and the stock MAF scaling and see how the trims act. If they settle down, then you will know that it is the intake creating the problems. If not, then you might have a MAF problem.
It seems to me that once you fix one trim the other one gets FUBARed. Then you fix the FUBARed trim and the fixed trim becomes FUBARed. Just go back to the stock intake and the stock MAF scaling and start from there.
Last edited by nj1266; Apr 4, 2010 at 09:23 PM.
#27
You have to adjust scaling to your own car. You cannot borrow the scaling from Hollywood_X and just slap it on your car and expect it to work. It is trial and error and you have to keep trying until you hit the desired trim.
Having the LTFT_idle pegged at -12.5% inorder to get the LTFT_cruise at 4% is not good practice. Your car will be spitting fuel at idle with your ECU unable to correct the rich condition. If your idle trim is pegged max negative, that will also trigger a CEL. It is P0172 (i think), system too rich. The car will waste gas and FE will suck big time.
Go back to the stock intake and the stock MAF scaling and see how the trims act. If they settle down, then you will know that it is the intake creating the problems. If not, then you might have a MAF problem.
It seems to me that once you fix one trim the other one gets FUBARed. Then you fix the FUBARed trim and the fixed trim becomes FUBARed. Just go back to the stock intake and the stock MAF scaling and start from there.
Having the LTFT_idle pegged at -12.5% inorder to get the LTFT_cruise at 4% is not good practice. Your car will be spitting fuel at idle with your ECU unable to correct the rich condition. If your idle trim is pegged max negative, that will also trigger a CEL. It is P0172 (i think), system too rich. The car will waste gas and FE will suck big time.
Go back to the stock intake and the stock MAF scaling and see how the trims act. If they settle down, then you will know that it is the intake creating the problems. If not, then you might have a MAF problem.
It seems to me that once you fix one trim the other one gets FUBARed. Then you fix the FUBARed trim and the fixed trim becomes FUBARed. Just go back to the stock intake and the stock MAF scaling and start from there.
agreed,
and the good thing too is im going to learn 29834 new things trouble shooting
NJ thanks much for all the help the past weeks. its greatly appreciated
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
498001061
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
5
Mar 2, 2013 10:00 AM