unclecomfort

iTrader: (7)

Do you mean the following with the plug and play +45 option?

http://www.maperformance.com/fuel-in...127-1100h.html

unclecomfort

iTrader: (7)

so which is the correct one?

Both are FIC 1100cc injectors but part numbers are different...

IS127-1100H (Maperformance)
http://www.maperformance.com/fuel-in...127-1100h.html
IS126-1100H (FIC website)
http://www.fuelinjectorclinic.com/cg...ey=IS126-1100H

so which is which?

tsitalon1

iTrader: (3)

It should be the top link and is what I am ordering... the bottom link lists them for evo VIII and IX.

tsitalon1

iTrader: (3)

Injectors have been purchased, waiting for delivery...


Anyone have scaling/latency info for these with pump gas?

Frankiago

iTrader: (2)

Somebody said it comes with them on an info card? Let us know if this info is given inside the box please.

tsitalon1

iTrader: (3)

Yeah I would imagine the latency values might be, but I don't believe the scaling info would be...

If I go with the normal 20% rule, I would scale them to 880... But this is probably wrong

mrfred

iTrader: (50)

See link to my review in the first page of this thread.

tsitalon1

iTrader: (3)

I tried that first but you scaled for E85....Oh wait I see "Travman" used 1008 for scaling and your latencies for pump gas...

That seems to blow away the normal 15-20% rule for scaling...hmm..

As someone who never owned an EVO prior to the X, are the stock injectors on the previous evo's the same an the X injectors? If so I should be able to use Travman's scaling.

mrfred

iTrader: (50)

Don't know of any 15-20% rule. FIC injectors traditionally scale much closer to their advertised value than other injectors. My latency values with travman's gasoline scaling should be a good starting point for you, even with an Evo 10.

tsitalon1

iTrader: (3)

Thanks! I will try it.

tephra

iTrader: (6)

IS127-1100H is the part number.

I don't know why fuelinjectorclinic.com doesn't list them...

fostytou

iTrader: (15)

Finally got mine in today and yeah, the included latencies weren't even close. Got me to +6.5% LTFTL and -12.5% LTFTM (maxxed out) with a 650cc scaling (based the scaling off idle). With that scaling I knew something wasn't right. Surprisingly they still drove pretty well, but the powerband was wayyy too rich.

I'm up at 790cc where I originally predicted and closer to stock scalings but on the FIC provided curve. I'll see where that gets me in the morning and possibly move towards travman's numbers.

tonyboy

iTrader: (4)

keep us posted with the scaling when you get it and your review.

tsitalon1

iTrader: (3)

Will do!

fostytou

iTrader: (15)

These things just do not want to scale right for me right now. With MrFred's latencies I'd still need a low 750ish- scaling to get enough fuel in there. It seemed like my sweet spot 14v latency was right between ~1.26-1.32 (~40% higher than were on the sheet) with a scaling around 812+ for drivability, but FTs were still +9/-7. This would suggest I would need even higher latencies, but the drivability started to fall off.

I have an open element filter, but trims before the injectors were -.39/-1.17.