Notices
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums Discuss the major engine management systems.

Another semi-useless fact about low load knocksum

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 17, 2010, 12:45 AM
  #1  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
Red face Another semi-useless fact about low load knocksum

Hi All,

I found this ages ago, but only just understand it now.

Now we all know that 0x24 (36) is the maximum knocksum the ECU will allow!

However this isn't the full story.

When you are UNDER the Load in the "Knock Load Threshold" table the ECU will actually use the following formula to limit your maximum KNOCK_SUM:

MAX Knock_Sum = 3 * (High_Oct_Ignition_Map - Low_Oct_Ignition_Map)

This is why when you increase your High Oct Map without touching your Low Oct Map you seem to get MORE knock in low load areas of the map.

It's not actually more knock - it's the same - its just the ECU is allowing more of it to be converted into "knocksum"

I dont know what this means in terms of tuning? I think it's best to leave the Low Oct Ignition Map alone anyways

But now you know

Cheers
D.
Old Aug 17, 2010, 06:50 AM
  #2  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
 
Clipse3GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 2,185
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
That's interesting... Thanks David for that!
Old Aug 17, 2010, 06:52 AM
  #3  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
I still am trying to work out why I get BIG knock in LOW load during the first 10 mins of my journey...

Even well after the ECT has come upto temp :|

I dont think its real knock, but it would be nice to pin it down
Old Aug 17, 2010, 01:39 PM
  #4  
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
scheides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Thanks tephra! Makes sense too based on what I've seen in the real world. Bump up timing a bunch on the high octane table and not on the lower one and suddenly knock goes through the roof! Doesn't really make sense....gotta keep the spread even-steven or adjust it accordingly.
Old Aug 17, 2010, 03:28 PM
  #5  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
 
Clipse3GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 2,185
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I never figured out why the low end knock at start up between like 1000-2500 rpm from first gear. I assume TOB noise picked up. Dunno...
Old Aug 17, 2010, 05:41 PM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Golden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, so you are saying that if I made the High Octane and Low Octane maps the same, I would never get part throttle knock (or should I say less than Load Threshold Knock)?

Could this be why Dino's car was seeing crazy part throttle knock a while back? I'm not sure if he tuned it or not.

Anyways, good find.

BTW, I do adjust my Low Octane Maps to be a static count less than my High Octane Maps. I should never really use the Low Octane Maps.
Old Aug 17, 2010, 07:33 PM
  #7  
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
andrewtf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Seaside Hgts/Jackson, NJ
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so if you set your load threshold to 0 it won't use that formula to calculate knocksum?

also will you be adding an "Alt Low Octane Timing" Map to your mod for those that want to use it on their alternate maps?
Old Aug 17, 2010, 08:56 PM
  #8  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
That should be correct.

No alt low octane map

keep in mind this is ONLY for LESS THAN 100 load - anything above that and your knock system is normal
Old Aug 22, 2010, 09:04 AM
  #9  
Evolving Member
 
xhomm02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Czech rep.
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So if I set Low oct. map identical to High oct map in 0-90 load, I will never get ignition timing pull in that area?

This would be helpful, cause I see almost always 1-6* pull (measured on AccessPort) in that area in low RPM during moving from lights at 1st gear -from idle. I have my High oct map about 4* higher in that area without knock at cruise, just at the moving from idle.

Is there any danger in making the maps identical in the low load?
Old Aug 22, 2010, 10:37 AM
  #10  
Evolving Member
 
grayw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Dave, does this formula also apply to earler models or just the X?
Old Aug 22, 2010, 05:42 PM
  #11  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
xhomm02 - I believe that would be correct, you wouldn't get any measureably knocksum anyways - give it a go.

personally I would NOT do that thou, you probably dont notice the 1-6* pull in low load, it will only happen randomly, and generally never after the car has been running 10 mins...

GrayW - I don't think so
Old Aug 22, 2010, 06:44 PM
  #12  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Golden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BTW: my car has been running for many months with the exact same timing in both high and low timing maps in the 0-90 load range. I get 1-5 knocks all the time. (Clutch noise taking off)
Old Aug 23, 2010, 06:42 AM
  #13  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
 
Clipse3GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 2,185
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Golden
BTW: my car has been running for many months with the exact same timing in both high and low timing maps in the 0-90 load range. I get 1-5 knocks all the time. (Clutch noise taking off)
Yup, like I have been saying for a year. TOB noise or clutch noise. It does not matter what motor mounts you have. Seen in stock EVO X's.
Old Aug 23, 2010, 07:09 AM
  #14  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Golden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My point was that since:

MAX Knock_Sum = 3 * (High_Oct_Ignition_Map - Low_Oct_Ignition_Map)

And my tables are equal:

MAX Knock_Sum = 3 * 0

You would think I would get 0 MAX Knock_Sum.
Old Aug 23, 2010, 08:27 AM
  #15  
Evolving Member
 
xhomm02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Czech rep.
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Golden
My point was that since:

MAX Knock_Sum = 3 * (High_Oct_Ignition_Map - Low_Oct_Ignition_Map)

And my tables are equal:

MAX Knock_Sum = 3 * 0

You would think I would get 0 MAX Knock_Sum.
Yes, if you see up to 5 knockcount, it looks like the formula must be more complex.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tephra
ECU Flash
927
Sep 13, 2021 01:07 AM
tephra
ECU Flash
982
Aug 19, 2016 10:07 AM
tephra
ECU Flash
32
Sep 15, 2012 09:38 AM
Jim in Tucson
E85 / Ethanol
49
Sep 2, 2010 01:41 PM
jcsbanks
ECU Flash
64
Sep 19, 2009 01:34 PM



Quick Reply: Another semi-useless fact about low load knocksum



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:19 PM.