Maxing out the Evo 10 MAF?
#1
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 130
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Maxing out the Evo 10 MAF?
I'm doing a bit of fine tuning on a friend's moderately modified Evo 10. Its making 430 whp DJ, and the MAF is hitting 4.92 V peak. He told me that there are some people who have replaced or who are planning to replace the MAF with a larger unit. I searched around in this forum and the engine forum, and all I found was this thread:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...housing-x.html
Anything else on the topic?
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...housing-x.html
Anything else on the topic?
#4
I'm doing a bit of fine tuning on a friend's moderately modified Evo 10. Its making 430 whp DJ, and the MAF is hitting 4.92 V peak. He told me that there are some people who have replaced or who are planning to replace the MAF with a larger unit. I searched around in this forum and the engine forum, and all I found was this thread:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...housing-x.html
Anything else on the topic?
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...housing-x.html
Anything else on the topic?
#6
Lomker and I are both running the same 3.5" intake right now. A local place fabbed it up for us and they are planning to vendor it through MAP.
Call/Email MAP if you want and ask them about the Primo 3.5" intake, they will know
Call/Email MAP if you want and ask them about the Primo 3.5" intake, they will know
#7
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 130
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Good info. Thank you. A few more questions if you've got a sec. 1) I did a little searching online, and it looks like its just a housing swap where the housing is essentially just a larger diameter tube. Is that correct? 2) Did you make any changes to the MAF scaling table?
Trending Topics
#8
The AEM intake also uses it's own MAF housing which is bigger then stock, it's around 3"
I've found you will end up having to scale the MAF tables approx 12-13% higher.
It sounds like you still have a bit of room left if you are "only" hitting 4.92v
- Bryan
I've found you will end up having to scale the MAF tables approx 12-13% higher.
It sounds like you still have a bit of room left if you are "only" hitting 4.92v
- Bryan
#9
Good info. Thank you. A few more questions if you've got a sec. 1) I did a little searching online, and it looks like its just a housing swap where the housing is essentially just a larger diameter tube. Is that correct? 2) Did you make any changes to the MAF scaling table?
Yes, my tuner did rescale the MAF tables for the intake. I would share it with you if I did it, but its my tuners work
#13
#14
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 130
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
The powerband is amazing. Up to 6500 rpm, its almost identical to my Evo 9 stock turbo E85 setup, but after that, my power starts to drop while his just keeps climbing. I think peak power is somewhere out around 8500 rpm, and if we were to let it rev that far (haven't convinced him to let it rev that far yet), it should make 450 whp DJ.