Notices
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums Discuss the major engine management systems.

Boost surges in powerband with AP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 21, 2011 | 09:38 AM
  #1  
HELPr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Tarmac WI
Boost surges in powerband with AP

Hey guys, not sure if surge is the right word but i searched it and came up with no results so perhaps there is a better term to describe this but here goes.

Im running the Cobb AP with ets intake, and initially things were pretty smooth, but now regardless of my map choice (as none specifically meet the ETS intake) when I hit the power band my boost surges back and fourth between 26-20 it seemed like it was overboosting and cutting the boost then quickly trying to overboost again and correct rapidly.. but with a stage one map I overboost sometimes 26 - 27 or so if i use a LWG map to correct this i peak at about 20-22 on a stage 2 LWG map i usually peak at about 26 in first two gears but then 24-23 in the upper gears.. I was wondering if perhapse my wastegate was the issue? sounds like a lot of flutter.

Mods AP - ETS intake - Buschur UICP - (still runnning the factroy boost control pill in line)

I can log if someone would like though i dont know what format to put it in so others can view it when attached.

Thanks
-J
Old May 21, 2011 | 10:00 AM
  #2  
stetson1818's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: sumter sc
i've got a fairly similair issue, i've got only the ets intake and when i first started flashing the maps i got overboost like your numbers. i ran the sf 93 oct stage 1 for awhile and noticed alot of knock and overboost. tried the LWG map and was boosting about that 20-22 you're seeing. i switched over to the SF 91 oct stage 2 map and things seem to be alot better now. my knock was reduced to almost nothing (few .3 .7 and 1's in sub 140 load) and i dont seem to be overboosting much if at all now. i may hit a spike of 25.3ish every now and then seems to be more so towards after i've only been driving for a little bit but after that i dont hit to much over 24.4 when entering WOT.

so if i was you i would try out either the stage 1 or stage 2 91 oct SF map and see if it helps you like it helped me
Old May 21, 2011 | 01:50 PM
  #3  
HELPr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Tarmac WI
Thanks for the info stetson, ill definately give that a try today.. though it is 92 degrees here haha.. I just tried the AMS 93 LWG stg 2 but havent gone wot with it yet to see how its acting but ill probably try the 91 octane solution with the stg 1 sf..
your running 93 still i assume?
Old May 21, 2011 | 08:24 PM
  #4  
stetson1818's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: sumter sc
dont run the ams map, its maf housing is not the same size as ours, stick with the cobb sf maps.

and yes im still running 93 oct gas with the 91 oct map. that 93 oct map just makes me knock alot for some reason.
Old May 21, 2011 | 09:08 PM
  #5  
fostytou's Avatar
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,143
Likes: 7
From: Aurora, IL
The up and down is probably just a correction factor that is too large combined with too much BWGDC for your car. You can also try adjusting the error correction in access tuner if that option is available.
Old May 22, 2011 | 09:27 AM
  #6  
HELPr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Tarmac WI
Originally Posted by stetson1818
dont run the ams map, its maf housing is not the same size as ours, stick with the cobb sf maps.

and yes im still running 93 oct gas with the 91 oct map. that 93 oct map just makes me knock alot for some reason.
Yeah I stayed away from the AMS maps initally because of this fact, but i never got around to swapping my maps yesterday and the AMS map is actually runnnig good, little to no knock, minimal trim corrections, and steady boost at 24-24.7 no surging with smooth power delivery up to redline..

I still want to try the 91 SF map and see how that goes but its tough becuase the X hasnt operated this smooth in some time..

FOST, thanks for the insight.. which factors were your refering to in terms of correction adjustment? and what is the B is B wastegate duty cycle? noob question im sure but I just got up.

Thanks guys
Old May 22, 2011 | 02:14 PM
  #7  
iceman1680's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Check your UICP connections. There may be a leak somewhere. I was having similar fluctuation with boost and retightened the connections on my APT UICP which fixed the problem.
Old May 23, 2011 | 06:24 AM
  #8  
stetson1818's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: sumter sc
Originally Posted by HELPr
Yeah I stayed away from the AMS maps initally because of this fact, but i never got around to swapping my maps yesterday and the AMS map is actually runnnig good, little to no knock, minimal trim corrections, and steady boost at 24-24.7 no surging with smooth power delivery up to redline..

what map are you running? i may try and log my car with that map and see how well it likes it
Old May 23, 2011 | 09:28 AM
  #9  
fostytou's Avatar
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,143
Likes: 7
From: Aurora, IL
Originally Posted by HELPr
FOST, thanks for the insight.. which factors were your refering to in terms of correction adjustment? and what is the B is B wastegate duty cycle? noob question im sure but I just got up.

Thanks guys
BEC = Boost Error correction
BWGDC = Base wastegate duty cycle

I'm not sure what their equivalent names are in access tuner.
Old May 23, 2011 | 12:41 PM
  #10  
Golden's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
In ATR:

BEC = Turbo Dynamics
BWGDC = Fine Wastegate Duty Cycle
Old May 24, 2011 | 05:12 AM
  #11  
Mad_SB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Originally Posted by fostytou
The up and down is probably just a correction factor that is too large combined with too much BWGDC for your car. You can also try adjusting the error correction in access tuner if that option is available.
^ this... plus the intake probably offset the maf based load and since you don't have a map designed for the intake your load calc (one of the three main inputs for load based boost control, the other two being rpm and tps) you are more than likely hitting an error correction loop.

You need to retune the boost control setup and or the maf scale tables.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
evo10fanatic33
Cobb AccessPORT
1
Nov 19, 2014 11:06 AM
The_Police
Cobb AccessPORT
1
May 26, 2014 08:12 AM
HELPr
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
3
Apr 19, 2012 09:19 PM
blonde
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
10
Dec 28, 2010 06:31 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:39 PM.