NoTec

iTrader: (4)

AEM FIC. Mentioned in their other thread.

Jim_Patterson

iTrader: (13)

Nice work guys.

Tunerhead

iTrader: (2)

Pretty nice numbers with 93! Will check out the dyno chart with you throw it up here.

futurevowner

iTrader: (1)

should 400whp be possible when you have more aggressive cams and can fully tune?

richyc

still w8 2 see device used to tune? flash?

Billy@EnglishRacing

iTrader: (18)

Looks good Martin!

3000ways

Those are very pretty impressive numbers. It is hard to compare dynos numbers from so many different dynos, so in my opinion the best way is to compare the numbers from the same dynos. For instance on the AMS dynojet (which in my opinion reads a little lower than other dynojets and some DDs ) there have been EVO IXs that have put down 330whp to 340whp on that dyno and went out ran deep in the 11s with 114mph to 116mph traps. An EVO IX with TBE, intake, MBC@23-24PSI, Intercooler and pipping, 02 housing, Cams, and tune should expect to put down 340whp to 350whp on AMS dynojet, if your lucky you may put down more. But 356whp w/ those mods is pretty impressive especially considering that the EVO X makes less power stock for stock in comparison to a EVO IX, but it gains more power with simple bolt ons. Before the EVO X haters start to b*tch, the EVO IX stock turbo in my opinion has just started and still has loads of potential and power left to be had, while I am still unsure of how much is left in the EVO X stock turbo. I have feeling that with Meth or Race fuel and Cams (and a killer tune) it should top out at right around 400whp (Just my opinion).

Joe's Evo X

iTrader: (4)

[QUOTE=ONRAILS;5411901]People seem to be having a lot of trouble to get it off the line at the 5k limiter on stock clutch.

It may be fine with 350whp.


Well the 2 step is 55k and first time at the track i at a 1.9 60ft so i didnt think it was to bad. I hit a 13.50 at 103mph not to bad.

Robevo RS

iTrader: (16)

"EVO IXs that have put down 330whp to 340whp on that dyno and went out ran deep in the 11s with 114mph to 116mph traps. An EVO IX with TBE, intake, MBC@23-24PSI, Intercooler and pipping, 02 housing, Cams, and tune should expect to put down 340whp to 350whp on AMS dynojet, if your lucky you may put down more."

No arguing , but i have to make a note here ,because that comment.
No cams ,no piping, no intercooler, but fuel pump and tune
the IX will put down 350 whp. on dyno jet with a good tune, if you put cams even more if you put IC set even more.

My buddy did TBE, O2 housing,fuel pump, MBC,intake + tune = 352 whp on Dyno Jet



i did 356 whp but i have extra IC set up , and different tune for longer abuse, for road racing.

we both at 24 psi on pump 93.

NoTec

iTrader: (4)

Not only did you post a sheet from a different dynojet, you posted one without a baseline.

FLOW1

Very nice numbers, wish I had an EvoX.

mnetwork

When will the downpipe be available for sale??

Talonboost

Martin, would like to see you guys go back to using rpm on the horizontal scale instead of mph.

EricJ@AMS

iTrader: (1)

That dyno sheet is from a 424x Dynojet so the number should be right on par with ours. Dynojets are intertia dynos with nothing more than weather conditions to change the output number. As long as it is a dual 24" roller design, we have found they are VERY close to each other.

It is printed in uncorrected with favorable weather conditions so I would expect an SAE printout of that run to be 2-3% lower however.

Robevo RS

iTrader: (16)

its a dyno jet. thats all i know. My friend post his sheet, so that is why i have it./copied of from the forum /
But, me and him installed the parts on his car.
I'm not dyno fan , just when you post the highest X, i think it is fair to get something better from the IX, if you do comparisions.

if you need more info ,so we dont go off topic PM. me.