ams o2 dp vs perrin dp with hfc part II
#1
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: pa
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ams o2 dp vs perrin dp with hfc part II
need opinion from you guys.im going to sean ivey for tuning in 3 weeks.so far my mods are hks-reloaded intake, ic pipes, hi power exhaust and ams ic. im not going for a bigger turbo in the near future, staying with the stock turbo. do you think i should go with the ams o2 dp, perrin dp with hfc ? would it really make more power with the stock turbo?or should i stay stock?for the price of each dp ,is it worth $ per hp and tq?need advice ...
#2
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think AMS has awesome products but if you're gonna stick with the factory turbocharger, there's no need for a bigger 02 housing.
I have all Perrin and dollar per horsepower between the two, it's an extra mod or two.
It's your money, but best bang for the buck, go Perrin.
edit: taking off factory o2 housing is a biiitch....
I have all Perrin and dollar per horsepower between the two, it's an extra mod or two.
It's your money, but best bang for the buck, go Perrin.
edit: taking off factory o2 housing is a biiitch....
Last edited by sne2040; Jun 3, 2009 at 01:02 PM.
#7
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: pa
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
will it make a big difference if you tune it now without the ams o2 dp/ perrin dp hfc than when you have it and then tune? estimate hp/tq gains with or without it with tune?
Trending Topics
#8
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
I like the AMS "Big mouth" housing. Damn I like all the AMS stuff, top notch.
As for tuning after adding parts, I would say add as many parts as possible before the tune, makes sense.
There are things you can change after the tune, the intake pipe and filter not being one of them as it has such a dramatic effect.
Sean
As for tuning after adding parts, I would say add as many parts as possible before the tune, makes sense.
There are things you can change after the tune, the intake pipe and filter not being one of them as it has such a dramatic effect.
Sean
#9
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just installed mine a few days ago. The quality is top notch. But the install took forever. However, even if it took twice the amount of time to install, I'd still choose my AMS dp.
#10
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Oak Harbor,WA
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I went with the ETS o2 DP.Quality is outstanding and I believe they have had their car on a dyno with the DP before and after.Just go to the Dyno section under ETS Dyno results.
#12
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Apples vs Oranges. I don't know how these two parts can be compared since they're designed to do two different things. The AMS pipe will yield more gains because it replaces the restrictive stock O2 housing and the perrin does not.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sun_ice4
Evo X Show / Shine
42
Apr 22, 2015 02:50 PM