Notices
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine builds to the best clutch and flywheel.

Ets t3 twin scroll turbo kit or ap t3 twin scroll turbo kit?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 22, 2010, 01:03 PM
  #31  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (91)
 
ETS Michael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 8,685
Received 54 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by VGergo
FP said they can make the HTA for ATP Garrett Dual Ball Bearing Twin-scroll GT3076R, with an ETS manifold and 3" o2 house/downpipe it coud be a great offer too. What do you think ?

But yes ETS TS HTA3076 is kit.. just bolt on with every accesories.
Stock turbine housing? It's too small for any real power.
Old Nov 22, 2010, 01:04 PM
  #32  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
murlo26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ETS Michael
Stock turbine housing? It's too small for any real power.
The X stock turbine is too small? If that is your stance I would disagree
Old Nov 22, 2010, 01:20 PM
  #33  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (91)
 
ETS Michael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 8,685
Received 54 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by murlo26
The X stock turbine is too small? If that is your stance I would disagree
I have an FPBlack here and I can see why it gets choked up A larger turbine housing is definitely beneficial with an upgraded turbo.
Old Nov 22, 2010, 01:24 PM
  #34  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
murlo26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ETS Michael
I have an FPBlack here and I can see why it gets choked up A larger turbine housing is definitely beneficial with an upgraded turbo.
No arguments there, but you lose spool too...different strokes for different folks

I guess I just thought a 600whp capable turbo isn't anything to shake a stick at.
Old Nov 22, 2010, 01:28 PM
  #35  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (91)
 
ETS Michael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 8,685
Received 54 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by murlo26
No arguments there, but you lose spool too...different strokes for different folks

I guess I just thought a 600whp capable turbo isn't anything to shake a stick at.
It may be capable of making peak power at 600whp but maintaining it to red line is a different story

Just an example.

Stock Block, Stock Head, Stock Cams (non opened motor)

Standard 35R 22psi = 457whp (Dynojet)
Standard 35R 32psi = 614whp (Dynojet)

On a black, it's going to take damn near 40psi to make 600whp plus a built motor.

Michael
Old Nov 22, 2010, 01:35 PM
  #36  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
murlo26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You should be building the motor regardless at 500+ anyway.

I am not at all trying to say a 35r is a bad idea...lord knows I will probably end up with one on my car shooting for 700whp...then 800whp in 2 years...then my dumb *** will probably be in the gutted X with cage slicks and 1000whp in 5 years...lol

I am just saying the black is still a great turbo option for a turbo that can spool up at 4k and make some great numbers...I make my 570whp at like 7500ish. Holding over 500whp for 3krpms and with the spool I have I am looking at almost 5k of powerband...But as you can see from the torque curve, it is choking out up top, I am hoping a nice tubular mani will keep that torque going more and I can hold peak power out further.


No denying that my setup with a nice basic 35r would make power stupid easy. I bet at 32 psi my built head/cams I make closer to 700whp where yours made 615...so yea might be a smart move....
Old Nov 22, 2010, 01:49 PM
  #37  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (91)
 
ETS Michael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 8,685
Received 54 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by murlo26
You should be building the motor regardless at 500+ anyway.

I am not at all trying to say a 35r is a bad idea...lord knows I will probably end up with one on my car shooting for 700whp...then 800whp in 2 years...then my dumb *** will probably be in the gutted X with cage slicks and 1000whp in 5 years...lol

I am just saying the black is still a great turbo option for a turbo that can spool up at 4k and make some great numbers...I make my 570whp at like 7500ish. Holding over 500whp for 3krpms and with the spool I have I am looking at almost 5k of powerband...But as you can see from the torque curve, it is choking out up top, I am hoping a nice tubular mani will keep that torque going more and I can hold peak power out further.


No denying that my setup with a nice basic 35r would make power stupid easy. I bet at 32 psi my built head/cams I make closer to 700whp where yours made 615...so yea might be a smart move....
Ya, our numbers were on a standard 35R. I doubt a standard 35R is going to make 700whp We did run an HTA3586 at 33psi and made it in the 700's, but I was comparing a turbo that spools like the black.

We were able to get a 35R w/ .63 A/R to spool around 4000-4200rpm and pull all the way to 9k RPM. This made for a great street setup. Also the torque was pretty amazing.

I guess the debate is up in the air. For me... I would rather buy once then buy twice. If you start with the 35R it's easily upgradeable to an HTA3582/86

Also at 18 psi with a 35R we were over 400whp, it's not a bad way to start out with lower then stock boost levels.

Michael
Old Nov 22, 2010, 01:55 PM
  #38  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
murlo26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well your kit has a nice tubular mani though, which helps top end a lot over a stocker When I get one of those, I will decide if its stupid to do a black or just go right for the 35r...I agree a 35r is a much easier way to do it...its just easier to buy parts piece by piece.

I had no intentions of going this far with my car...blowing up a motor changes things.
Old Nov 22, 2010, 04:16 PM
  #39  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
chkmgnt59's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't want to jump too far in to this debate, because obviously a 35r will make more up top than a black. But... at 18psi, on the black I made 390 on a mustang, so over 400 at below stock boost there as well :-)

And for the guys who already spent thousands on bolt-ons, the black provides a good path. If I were totally stock, the only option would be ets 35r kit. But I was already invested, and I don't think I need more than 600whp, which the black can get me to :-)
Old Nov 22, 2010, 07:14 PM
  #40  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
murlo26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by chkmgnt59
I don't want to jump too far in to this debate, because obviously a 35r will make more up top than a black. But... at 18psi, on the black I made 390 on a mustang, so over 400 at below stock boost there as well :-)

And for the guys who already spent thousands on bolt-ons, the black provides a good path. If I were totally stock, the only option would be ets 35r kit. But I was already invested, and I don't think I need more than 600whp, which the black can get me to :-)
Yea i think i was over 400whp at wastegate as well
Old Nov 23, 2010, 01:45 PM
  #41  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
VGergo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hungary
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ETS Michael
Ya, our numbers were on a standard 35R. I doubt a standard 35R is going to make 700whp We did run an HTA3586 at 33psi and made it in the 700's, but I was comparing a turbo that spools like the black.

We were able to get a 35R w/ .63 A/R to spool around 4000-4200rpm and pull all the way to 9k RPM. This made for a great street setup. Also the torque was pretty amazing.

I guess the debate is up in the air. For me... I would rather buy once then buy twice. If you start with the 35R it's easily upgradeable to an HTA3582/86

Also at 18 psi with a 35R we were over 400whp, it's not a bad way to start out with lower then stock boost levels.

Michael
I would really see that 35R what coud spool in around 4000-4200rpm. Is it on 2.0 ? Because than on 2.3 stroker it will be a magic power band
Old Dec 9, 2010, 03:34 AM
  #42  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
VGergo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hungary
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ETS Michael !

Can we choose your twinscroll evo x turbo kit with GTX3076 in HTA ?
Old Dec 9, 2010, 05:29 AM
  #43  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
chkmgnt59's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
gtx3076 HTA? no such turbo exists. you can get a gtx3076 though from them.
Old Dec 9, 2010, 03:38 PM
  #44  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
project_skyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by VGergo
ETS Michael !

Can we choose your twinscroll evo x turbo kit with GTX3076 in HTA ?


Why would you want to replace the wheels of your GTX with HTA ones? Thats what it does so there would be no advantage just a waste of money.
Old Dec 10, 2010, 10:27 AM
  #45  
Evolving Member
 
RB185AFM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pittsburg
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You guys are all wrong. You need a ETS single scroll with a 6262. Oh wait I may be biased. My bad.


Quick Reply: Ets t3 twin scroll turbo kit or ap t3 twin scroll turbo kit?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:28 PM.