mil spec or ams cat?
#4
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've read posts from people with a 100 count HFC stating it fails sniffer tests at state inspections. In addition they don't fully eliminate the smell you get from running a test pipe.
These reasons are why I went with the AMS 300 count HFC, plus their reputation for making high quality parts. I get no smell from my AMS HFC, it comes with two metal gaskets, fitment was perfect, and it has an extra bung for an A/F sensor.
These reasons are why I went with the AMS 300 count HFC, plus their reputation for making high quality parts. I get no smell from my AMS HFC, it comes with two metal gaskets, fitment was perfect, and it has an extra bung for an A/F sensor.
#5
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
Not sure about the milspec, but I have the AMS HFC and love it. Use to run the SX resonated test pipe and I would have to agree with you that the smell can be a little to much at times. Only draw back with the AMS is that I had to chop off one of the 3 bolts that holds a shield for the driveshaft cover. No biggie easy to do and the cover sits perfect with no rattles.
Trending Topics
#9
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
looking at the pic it is the heat shild behind your hanger and cat. It has some speckled surface rust on yours. There are 3 bolts. 2 on the bottom and one pointing right torward the cat. That one (maybe because of my exhaust setup, Cobb SS) I had to chop off or during bumps it would hit the cat. real nasty rattle!!