FP Black or GTX3076R.... thoughts?
#32
i was talking about the turbine housings not the compressor housings. atp sells the turbo with the compressor cover without the turbine housing, Forced performance sells a DSM flanged turbine housing that will bolt up to the GTX3076r. the turbine housings for the gtx but not the compressor housings.
#33
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i was talking about the turbine housings not the compressor housings. atp sells the turbo with the compressor cover without the turbine housing, Forced performance sells a DSM flanged turbine housing that will bolt up to the GTX3076r. the turbine housings for the gtx but not the compressor housings.
Garrett builds GT series turbos with custom turbine and compressor housings to bolt up to the stock manifold, but these compressor housings arent available for the GTX just yet.
#35
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
Some dynos popping up with the GTX3076:
STI:
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...2110277&page=4
S2000:
http://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php...=788561&st=875
The difference between a GTX and regular GT on an Evo might be more pronounced because both the STI and S2k run less boost to make the same power. And one of the advantages of the new aero of the GTX wheel is higher pressure ratio capability.
Hiboost, I remember your car having the boost drop off with the regular GT as I'm guessing you were running into the choke flow of the wheel, ~55-57 lbs/min. So the GTX wheel will let you hold the boost and flow level up. On the STI comparison by Perrin, they didn't max out the GT wheel as it was still able to hold boost, so I'd guess you'd see a bigger WHP gain. Maybe 35-40whp?
STI:
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...2110277&page=4
S2000:
http://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php...=788561&st=875
The difference between a GTX and regular GT on an Evo might be more pronounced because both the STI and S2k run less boost to make the same power. And one of the advantages of the new aero of the GTX wheel is higher pressure ratio capability.
Hiboost, I remember your car having the boost drop off with the regular GT as I'm guessing you were running into the choke flow of the wheel, ~55-57 lbs/min. So the GTX wheel will let you hold the boost and flow level up. On the STI comparison by Perrin, they didn't max out the GT wheel as it was still able to hold boost, so I'd guess you'd see a bigger WHP gain. Maybe 35-40whp?
#37
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
Some dynos popping up with the GTX3076:
STI:
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...2110277&page=4
S2000:
http://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php...=788561&st=875
The difference between a GTX and regular GT on an Evo might be more pronounced because both the STI and S2k run less boost to make the same power. And one of the advantages of the new aero of the GTX wheel is higher pressure ratio capability.
Hiboost, I remember your car having the boost drop off with the regular GT as I'm guessing you were running into the choke flow of the wheel, ~55-57 lbs/min. So the GTX wheel will let you hold the boost and flow level up. On the STI comparison by Perrin, they didn't max out the GT wheel as it was still able to hold boost, so I'd guess you'd see a bigger WHP gain. Maybe 35-40whp?
STI:
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...2110277&page=4
S2000:
http://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php...=788561&st=875
The difference between a GTX and regular GT on an Evo might be more pronounced because both the STI and S2k run less boost to make the same power. And one of the advantages of the new aero of the GTX wheel is higher pressure ratio capability.
Hiboost, I remember your car having the boost drop off with the regular GT as I'm guessing you were running into the choke flow of the wheel, ~55-57 lbs/min. So the GTX wheel will let you hold the boost and flow level up. On the STI comparison by Perrin, they didn't max out the GT wheel as it was still able to hold boost, so I'd guess you'd see a bigger WHP gain. Maybe 35-40whp?
I'm considering this turbo as an upgrade option but also have to be realistic about the engine holding together with all these HP upgrades. My fuel system is being worked over shortly at STM and we'll decide on what direction to take within the next few weeks. Check out this overlay with the GT35 and GT30 series turbos on the same chart:
I'm thinking that at a pressure ration of close to 3.0 (~29 psi?) the GTX3076R will really shine. It will still do pretty good at around 26 psi which is a more road course friendly boost level. Either way I think it will raise the corrected airflow from 55 Lbs/min up to around 63 Lbs/min... maybe even 65 Lbs/min at 33 psi and almost match the efficiency of a GT35r.
If I try this new turbo it will likely be a GTX3076r with a Tial housing and v-band. I'll keep you guys updated once we figure out more!
Last edited by Hiboost; Jan 11, 2011 at 10:38 PM.
#39
Evolving Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SL, UT
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Boost Pressure = Pressure Ratio * Atmospheric Pressure - Atmospheric Pressure
Conversely, Pressure Ratio = (Boost Pressure + Atmospheric Pressure) / Atmospheric Pressure
So, for a 3.0 Pressure Ratio at sea level (with an Atmospheric Pressure of approximately 14.7 psi), Boost Pressure would be 29.4 psi (3.0 * 14.7 - 14.7 = 29.4).
To calculate Pressure Ratio for a given boost pressure: for 25 psi at 4500 ft (12.5 psi Atmospheric Pressure), Pressure Ratio is 3.0 ( (25 + 12.5) / 12.5 = 3.0 ).
Conversely, Pressure Ratio = (Boost Pressure + Atmospheric Pressure) / Atmospheric Pressure
So, for a 3.0 Pressure Ratio at sea level (with an Atmospheric Pressure of approximately 14.7 psi), Boost Pressure would be 29.4 psi (3.0 * 14.7 - 14.7 = 29.4).
To calculate Pressure Ratio for a given boost pressure: for 25 psi at 4500 ft (12.5 psi Atmospheric Pressure), Pressure Ratio is 3.0 ( (25 + 12.5) / 12.5 = 3.0 ).
#40
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
Boost Pressure = Pressure Ratio * Atmospheric Pressure - Atmospheric Pressure
Conversely, Pressure Ratio = (Boost Pressure + Atmospheric Pressure) / Atmospheric Pressure
So, for a 3.0 Pressure Ratio at sea level (with an Atmospheric Pressure of approximately 14.7 psi), Boost Pressure would be 29.4 psi (3.0 * 14.7 - 14.7 = 29.4).
To calculate Pressure Ratio for a given boost pressure: for 25 psi at 4500 ft (12.5 psi Atmospheric Pressure), Pressure Ratio is 3.0 ( (25 + 12.5) / 12.5 = 3.0 ).
Conversely, Pressure Ratio = (Boost Pressure + Atmospheric Pressure) / Atmospheric Pressure
So, for a 3.0 Pressure Ratio at sea level (with an Atmospheric Pressure of approximately 14.7 psi), Boost Pressure would be 29.4 psi (3.0 * 14.7 - 14.7 = 29.4).
To calculate Pressure Ratio for a given boost pressure: for 25 psi at 4500 ft (12.5 psi Atmospheric Pressure), Pressure Ratio is 3.0 ( (25 + 12.5) / 12.5 = 3.0 ).
#41
Boost Pressure = Pressure Ratio * Atmospheric Pressure - Atmospheric Pressure
Conversely, Pressure Ratio = (Boost Pressure + Atmospheric Pressure) / Atmospheric Pressure
So, for a 3.0 Pressure Ratio at sea level (with an Atmospheric Pressure of approximately 14.7 psi), Boost Pressure would be 29.4 psi (3.0 * 14.7 - 14.7 = 29.4).
To calculate Pressure Ratio for a given boost pressure: for 25 psi at 4500 ft (12.5 psi Atmospheric Pressure), Pressure Ratio is 3.0 ( (25 + 12.5) / 12.5 = 3.0 ).
Conversely, Pressure Ratio = (Boost Pressure + Atmospheric Pressure) / Atmospheric Pressure
So, for a 3.0 Pressure Ratio at sea level (with an Atmospheric Pressure of approximately 14.7 psi), Boost Pressure would be 29.4 psi (3.0 * 14.7 - 14.7 = 29.4).
To calculate Pressure Ratio for a given boost pressure: for 25 psi at 4500 ft (12.5 psi Atmospheric Pressure), Pressure Ratio is 3.0 ( (25 + 12.5) / 12.5 = 3.0 ).
#42
i can't wait for a housing to come out since i don't want to go T3 for the sake of loosing spool + response on the track. Part of me just wants to give in and get the ETS kit but i'm trying to wait. Very curious what this will make a on 4b11T stock block and stock block w/cams ...
#44
Evolving Member
This thread makes no sense to me what turbos's are we trying to compare?
FP black VS bolt on garret or t3/t4/vband gt/gtx3076? I mean if we're comparing the garret bolt on to the black then black wins hands down. If we're comparing the black to lets say and ets or ams kit or custom kit with a t3 gt/gtx3076r then the t3's will be superior along with a $5000 difference in cost. Oh and with that being said if the bolt on garret turbos were now being made with the gtx turbine it may be another story =P
FP black VS bolt on garret or t3/t4/vband gt/gtx3076? I mean if we're comparing the garret bolt on to the black then black wins hands down. If we're comparing the black to lets say and ets or ams kit or custom kit with a t3 gt/gtx3076r then the t3's will be superior along with a $5000 difference in cost. Oh and with that being said if the bolt on garret turbos were now being made with the gtx turbine it may be another story =P
Last edited by LapDance; Jan 16, 2011 at 07:36 AM.
#45
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I started the thread to compare a full turbo kit wth the GTX in relation the a fp black. I have been tempted to do both but I tihnk I'm going to get the ets kit with the gtx after I sell a car. In time for spring :-)