2.2 erl motor 9:5:1 turbo a/r ?
Jan 20, 2012, 01:47 PM
#32
Yeah that does suck. I guess that is another reason I wont get rid of my 8 hahaha. But still for a road race application a larger turbo with a smaller a/r I still think isn't the better option. Although something like a 3076r which I have on my talon with a .63 a/r still would be to laggy I would think. I mean sure the turbo hits hard but point of the road race is being able to get on the throttle in the apex of the turn and keeping the momentium going. With a larger turbo I am sure it can be done, but not my first choice even with an x. I would want something that would spool up fast and keep the momentium going rather then have that little bit of hesitation.
Jan 20, 2012, 01:52 PM
#33
Hahaha no it is cool and please don't think I am tring to badger anyone here. after seeing the last post with the dyno graph honestly I knew the x turbo was a little different, but I didn't really know they had that much drop off from the 8 and 9. I guess I was thinking if all were equil ya know.
Jan 20, 2012, 01:58 PM
#34
Hahaha no it is cool and please don't think I am tring to badger anyone here. after seeing the last post with the dyno graph honestly I knew the x turbo was a little different, but I didn't really know they had that much drop off from the 8 and 9. I guess I was thinking if all were equil ya know.
That is me vs. a very similarly built evo8 fpblack. He had s3 cams. But still held more boost/flatter boost out to redline. He was on an MBC too so if he switched to ECU controlled boost like the GM 3 port or something I bet he could hold even more.
Jan 20, 2012, 02:14 PM
#35
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: home
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so with the help from all of you guyz i spoke back with my shop and the 6266 should be here within the next 2 to 3 weeks . when i get the motor back and turbo i will be posting pics thanx again
Jan 26, 2012, 12:45 PM
#37
Hands down a 6266. We have been doing a lot of testing with this turbo. If it's a street car.... this turbo is a beast.
On a 2.0L we put down 730whp at 35psi. We made 27psi by 4500rpms using a .82 a/r v-band turbine housing. Torque is great. It's a perfect street turbo in my eyes.
Michael
On a 2.0L we put down 730whp at 35psi. We made 27psi by 4500rpms using a .82 a/r v-band turbine housing. Torque is great. It's a perfect street turbo in my eyes.
Michael
Just to give you guys an idea, I tuned a stock block X on 93 at 508whp w/ FP Black very very conservative. I think a full build on tilt I would like to hit 650whp safely. There are a lot of things you can do to make power that a lot of people over look. One, is compression, which more times than not, seems to be over looked by a lot of people... The whole not being able to running high compression on a turbo car days are over! No reason in the world to do a 9.5:1 unless you are on 91 oct. 10:1 or 10.5:1 is what should be used. Every full point of compression is about 4% more power. So on my car, compared to a stock compression build, my increased compression is giving me an extra 52whp ish. Compression can make a lot more power and doesn't stress the turbo as much. Just some food for thought. My motor is around 10.8:1. It runs on 93 and with practicaly no * and only 19psi it still makes mid 500s. Who is to say you can't run a race car on pump? Tuning makes the world of difference as I'm sure most of you know.
Mikey
Jan 26, 2012, 01:07 PM
#40
No sir, your bore is larger which helps with knock suppression and your head flows better. I would do some bowl work in the head while the head is off though. Bowl work is a huge gain in power and knock suppression that a lot of people don't exploit to their advantage.
Mikey
Mikey
Jan 26, 2012, 01:15 PM
#41
True we can't hold as much boost, but dual mivec, better flowing head equals this for spool up
That is me vs. a very similarly built evo8 fpblack. He had s3 cams. But still held more boost/flatter boost out to redline. He was on an MBC too so if he switched to ECU controlled boost like the GM 3 port or something I bet he could hold even more.
That is me vs. a very similarly built evo8 fpblack. He had s3 cams. But still held more boost/flatter boost out to redline. He was on an MBC too so if he switched to ECU controlled boost like the GM 3 port or something I bet he could hold even more.
Jan 26, 2012, 04:01 PM
#42
No sir, your bore is larger which helps with knock suppression and your head flows better. I would do some bowl work in the head while the head is off though. Bowl work is a huge gain in power and knock suppression that a lot of people don't exploit to their advantage.
Mikey
Mikey
Mar 8, 2012, 11:11 AM
#45
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: home
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the car is almost done i was waitting for a twin disc and ended up with a quartermaster prototype 
http://i1034.photobucket.com/albums/...x/IMG_4556.jpg http://i1034.photobucket.com/albums/...1062450143.jpg
http://i1034.photobucket.com/albums/...x/IMG_4556.jpg http://i1034.photobucket.com/albums/...1062450143.jpg