Boomba Racing Fuel Rail VS OEM Fuel Rail
#1
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Boomba Racing Fuel Rail VS OEM Fuel Rail
Objective
The objective of this experiment is to determine flow rate capacities of an OEM CZ4A fuel rail and a Boomba Racing CZ4A fuel rail.
Theory
As a volume of fluid passes through a given surface over a certain period of time, a volumetric flow rate can be calculated. In order to simplify equations, the surface will be assumed to be a flat, plain cross section. It is also safe to assume that the fuel rail holds a fixed volume. Consider the flow to be steady, and no fluid accumulates. Therefore, conservation of mass holds true since the amount of fluid flowing into the fuel rail is equal to the amount of fuel flowing out of the fuel rail. Density of the fluid will not change within the fuel rail.
Equipment List
OEM CZ4A Fuel Rail
Boomba Racing CZ4A Fuel Rail
Brown & Sharpe Electronic Caliper Part No. 00590090/Serial No. 2P 2854 06
Procedure
Part A
Upon visual inspection of the two fuel rails side by side, there is a size difference of the inlets as seen in Fig. 1 below.
Fig. 1 Side by side comparison of OEM and Boomba Racing rails
Measure the inlets on both the OEM CZ4A fuel rail and the Boomba Racing fuel rail. For illustrative purposes, Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 depict measurements based from the Brown & Sharp Electronic Caliper.
Fig. 2 OEM Fuel Rail
Fig. 3 Boomba Racing Fuel Rail with Fitting
Reconfirm measurements with use of gauge pins.
Part B
Remove the fitting supplied on the Boomba Racing fuel rail that allows mating of OEM fuel lines to rail and measure the inlet. Again, Fig. 4 is attached for illustrative purposes.
Fig. 4 Boomba Racing Fuel Rail without Fitting
Data
Part A
OEM Fuel Rail diameter:
Inlet: 0.193 [in]
Boomba Racing Fuel Rail diameter with Fitting:
Inlet: 0.228 [in]
Part B
Boomba Racing Fuel Rail without Fitting diameter:
Inlet: 0.690 [in]
Analysis of Data
Flow rate for this experiment can be defined as:
In order to compare these two fuel rails side by side, velocity is chosen to be a constant to express flow rate characteristics.
Cross-sectional area of a circle can be defined as:
Part A
OEM Fuel Rail average cross-sectional area:
Average: 0.029 [in^2]
Boomba Racing average cross-sectional area with fitting:
Average: 0.041 [in^2]
Part B
Boomba Racing average cross-sectional area without fitting:
Average: 0.374 [in^2]
Discussion of Results
With velocity being the same, then as cross-sectional area increases, so would the flow rate. Looking at each fuel rail individually, the maximum flow rate able to be achieved would be at the minimum area. It so happens that it would be the inlet of the fuel rail that causes the most restriction.
Part A
OEM Fuel Rail area:
Minimum: 0.029 [in^2]
Boomba Racing Fuel Rail area with fitting:
Minimum: 0.041 [in^2]
The Boomba Racing Fuel Rail with fitting has a cross-sectional area that is 1.4 times larger than that of the OEM Fuel Rail.
Part B
Boomba Racing Fuel Rail area without fitting:
Minimum: 0.374 [in^2]
The Boomba Racing Fuel Rail without fitting has a cross-sectional area that is 12.8 times larger than that of the OEM Fuel Rail.
Conclusion
Keep in mind that these results are for the two fuel rails tested. Since these products are both mass produced, tolerances have to be tight. However, there may be a slight variation from piece to piece. This experiment tried to isolate as many variables as possible and employed different measuring techniques in order to minimize errors. Assumptions made were viable in this experiment, since tolerances were to the 0.001". Any neglected variables would fall into these tolerances.
The Boomba Racing Fuel Rail has the potential to outflow the OEM Fuel Rail by 1.4 times with the fitting and by 12.8 times without the fitting, since the flow rate and area exhibit a linear relationship.
This may seem like quite trivial work, but we here at Boomba Racing put this much time and thought into evaluating each of our products before any production begins. Rest assured that everything is designed, manufactured, assembled, and tested in house.
The objective of this experiment is to determine flow rate capacities of an OEM CZ4A fuel rail and a Boomba Racing CZ4A fuel rail.
Theory
As a volume of fluid passes through a given surface over a certain period of time, a volumetric flow rate can be calculated. In order to simplify equations, the surface will be assumed to be a flat, plain cross section. It is also safe to assume that the fuel rail holds a fixed volume. Consider the flow to be steady, and no fluid accumulates. Therefore, conservation of mass holds true since the amount of fluid flowing into the fuel rail is equal to the amount of fuel flowing out of the fuel rail. Density of the fluid will not change within the fuel rail.
Equipment List
OEM CZ4A Fuel Rail
Boomba Racing CZ4A Fuel Rail
Brown & Sharpe Electronic Caliper Part No. 00590090/Serial No. 2P 2854 06
Procedure
Part A
Upon visual inspection of the two fuel rails side by side, there is a size difference of the inlets as seen in Fig. 1 below.
Fig. 1 Side by side comparison of OEM and Boomba Racing rails
Measure the inlets on both the OEM CZ4A fuel rail and the Boomba Racing fuel rail. For illustrative purposes, Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 depict measurements based from the Brown & Sharp Electronic Caliper.
Fig. 2 OEM Fuel Rail
Fig. 3 Boomba Racing Fuel Rail with Fitting
Reconfirm measurements with use of gauge pins.
Part B
Remove the fitting supplied on the Boomba Racing fuel rail that allows mating of OEM fuel lines to rail and measure the inlet. Again, Fig. 4 is attached for illustrative purposes.
Fig. 4 Boomba Racing Fuel Rail without Fitting
Data
Part A
OEM Fuel Rail diameter:
Inlet: 0.193 [in]
Boomba Racing Fuel Rail diameter with Fitting:
Inlet: 0.228 [in]
Part B
Boomba Racing Fuel Rail without Fitting diameter:
Inlet: 0.690 [in]
Analysis of Data
Flow rate for this experiment can be defined as:
Q=A*v
EQ. 1
Where: Q=volumetric flow rate
A=cross-sectional area
v=velocity
Where: Q=volumetric flow rate
A=cross-sectional area
v=velocity
In order to compare these two fuel rails side by side, velocity is chosen to be a constant to express flow rate characteristics.
Cross-sectional area of a circle can be defined as:
A=πr^2
EQ. 2
Where: r=radius
Where: r=radius
Part A
OEM Fuel Rail average cross-sectional area:
Average: 0.029 [in^2]
Boomba Racing average cross-sectional area with fitting:
Average: 0.041 [in^2]
Part B
Boomba Racing average cross-sectional area without fitting:
Average: 0.374 [in^2]
Discussion of Results
With velocity being the same, then as cross-sectional area increases, so would the flow rate. Looking at each fuel rail individually, the maximum flow rate able to be achieved would be at the minimum area. It so happens that it would be the inlet of the fuel rail that causes the most restriction.
Part A
OEM Fuel Rail area:
Minimum: 0.029 [in^2]
Boomba Racing Fuel Rail area with fitting:
Minimum: 0.041 [in^2]
The Boomba Racing Fuel Rail with fitting has a cross-sectional area that is 1.4 times larger than that of the OEM Fuel Rail.
Part B
Boomba Racing Fuel Rail area without fitting:
Minimum: 0.374 [in^2]
The Boomba Racing Fuel Rail without fitting has a cross-sectional area that is 12.8 times larger than that of the OEM Fuel Rail.
Conclusion
Keep in mind that these results are for the two fuel rails tested. Since these products are both mass produced, tolerances have to be tight. However, there may be a slight variation from piece to piece. This experiment tried to isolate as many variables as possible and employed different measuring techniques in order to minimize errors. Assumptions made were viable in this experiment, since tolerances were to the 0.001". Any neglected variables would fall into these tolerances.
The Boomba Racing Fuel Rail has the potential to outflow the OEM Fuel Rail by 1.4 times with the fitting and by 12.8 times without the fitting, since the flow rate and area exhibit a linear relationship.
This may seem like quite trivial work, but we here at Boomba Racing put this much time and thought into evaluating each of our products before any production begins. Rest assured that everything is designed, manufactured, assembled, and tested in house.
Trending Topics
#10
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Keep in mind that we include a plug for the FPR in our kit if you ever need it.
Other fittings may be too large to fit into this location. Notice the clearance. This is our O-8 to AN-6 fitting.
We also have FPR Adapters, both straight and 90 degree elbows (pictured)
Turns it into a female AN-6.
Need a male end? Not a problem with our O-6 Male to AN-6 Male fitting.
Don't want AN- ends? We have a solution for that as well, we offer clamp style and push lock style barb fitting ends!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Boomba Racing
Evo 'For Sale' Engine Internals and Drivetrain
50
Jul 16, 2015 12:08 PM
Boomba Racing
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
9
Feb 2, 2012 02:19 PM
Boomba Racing
Vendor Announcements
7
Sep 30, 2009 07:45 AM