STI Versus Evolution X... SOON !
Dec 4, 2007, 09:55 PM
#94
Evolving Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Los angeles
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The other guy obviously didn't read the articles, all he read was the 0-60 OMG! 1/4 mile OMG! fast and furious !!!
He said oh lowering the engine and having torque come in sooner isnt a performance upgrade.
lol
shortening the overhangs isn't an upgrade, revising the dccd isn't a upgrade oh wells to each their own. i still see a better car
He said oh lowering the engine and having torque come in sooner isnt a performance upgrade.
lol shortening the overhangs isn't an upgrade, revising the dccd isn't a upgrade oh wells to each their own. i still see a better car
Dec 4, 2007, 10:20 PM
#95
Evolved Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sometimes these kids don't actually read what you type. They construct their own interpretation of what you said and then attack it. 
For example:
Me: The new STI isn't any faster 0-60 or 1/4
Clueless newbs: Why did you say the new STI is worse than the old one OMG!!$!@ It has blah blah blah....
Me: I didn't say the new STI is worse than the old one - I commented on the objective performance data.
Clueless newbs: You watch too many movies. 0-60 and 1/4 aren't everything.
See folks, that's a straw man.
It's sad. I blame the public school system.
For example:
Me: The new STI isn't any faster 0-60 or 1/4
Clueless newbs: Why did you say the new STI is worse than the old one OMG!!$!@ It has blah blah blah....
Me: I didn't say the new STI is worse than the old one - I commented on the objective performance data.
Clueless newbs: You watch too many movies. 0-60 and 1/4 aren't everything.
See folks, that's a straw man.
It's sad. I blame the public school system.
Dec 4, 2007, 10:24 PM
#96
Evolving Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Los angeles
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I guess he is talkin about himself, because obviously this is what he stated when i posted what upgrades subaru did.
Damn u.s. schools
Don't contradict your statements now.
performance upgrades doesn't mean 0-60 and 1/4 mile only
Damn u.s. schools
Don't contradict your statements now.
performance upgrades doesn't mean 0-60 and 1/4 mile only
Dec 4, 2007, 10:38 PM
#97
Evolved Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now, lets take a look at what you are referencing in the above post.
Originally Posted by bigflat4
The engine sits lower, its more nimble, more stable, doesnt feel cheap, doesn't rattle and road noise is gone, delivery of tq is sooner etc.... bunch of new things i would rather have over the old.
Regardless, I don't care about what is or is not a performance enhancement - that was never my point. I pointed out the objective performance data - nothing more. No conclusions about which car is better were being made. If you wish, you can keep attacking that straw man.
Braking 60-0:
'08 STI = 106 ft
'06 STI = 108 ft
MT figure eight:
'06 STI = 25.5 sec @ 0.72 g avg
'08 STI = 25.7 sec @ 0.69 g (avg)
Skidpad:
'06 STI = 0.91
'08 STI = 0.91
0-100:
'06 STI = 12.1 seconds
'08 STI = 13.3 seconds
1/4 mile:
'06 STI = 13.0@103.5
'08 STI = 13.4@100.5
Last edited by E. Haskell; Dec 4, 2007 at 10:42 PM.
Dec 5, 2007, 06:05 AM
#101
Evolving Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's with navigation, which was not an option in years past. Carr Subaru in Portland, Oregon quoted me $32.7K out the door for a base STI without the upgraded wheels and navigation option. That's only $700 more than what I paid for my '06 two years ago.
Dec 5, 2007, 06:11 AM
#103
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 2 places
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NICE
Sometimes these kids don't actually read what you type. They construct their own interpretation of what you said and then attack it.
For example:
Me: The new STI isn't any faster 0-60 or 1/4
Clueless newbs: Why did you say the new STI is worse than the old one OMG!!$!@ It has blah blah blah....
Me: I didn't say the new STI is worse than the old one - I commented on the objective performance data.
Clueless newbs: You watch too many movies. 0-60 and 1/4 aren't everything.
See folks, that's a straw man.
It's sad. I blame the public school system.
For example:
Me: The new STI isn't any faster 0-60 or 1/4
Clueless newbs: Why did you say the new STI is worse than the old one OMG!!$!@ It has blah blah blah....
Me: I didn't say the new STI is worse than the old one - I commented on the objective performance data.
Clueless newbs: You watch too many movies. 0-60 and 1/4 aren't everything.
See folks, that's a straw man.
It's sad. I blame the public school system.
Dec 7, 2007, 08:35 AM
#105
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort Gordon , GA
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Heres the verdict.
http://www.nihoncar.com/review-478-X.html
What a let down. I wanted to see more numbers on these two. oh well.
http://www.nihoncar.com/review-478-X.html
What a let down. I wanted to see more numbers on these two. oh well.