Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.

Evo x pricing from Edmunds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 12, 2007, 11:56 AM
  #1  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
Design1stCode2n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Evo x pricing from Edmunds

SCOTTSDALE, Arizona — Mitsubishi today announced pricing for the highly anticipated 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X. The estimated price for the base-level, five-speed manual-transmission-equipped Evo GSR is $34,000. The MR model outfitted with Mitsubishi's new six-speed dual-clutch transmission identified as the Twin Clutch-Sequential Sportshift Transmission (TC-SST), starts at $39,000.

Mitsubishi officials say this is a conservative estimate, and hope that final pricing will come in approximately $1,000 less for each model including delivery fees. The previous Lancer Evo IX sedan started at $28,679 for the base car, and $35,189 for the MR trim.

Mitsubishi says the Lancer Evo GSR will go on sale in February, but isn't as specific regarding the Evo MR's timeline, only saying the car would be available in the spring of 2008. The vagueness seems to be connected to delays in the advanced MR's tuning.

Also announced today were official EPA ratings for the Evo X. The GSR earned 16/22 mpg for city/highway, while the paddle-shifting MR did slightly better with 17/22 mpg.

The 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X made its worldwide debut in October at the 2007 Tokyo Auto Show.
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=123941
Old Dec 12, 2007, 12:02 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member
 
nongan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ca
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
B h u h a h u a...
Old Dec 12, 2007, 12:06 PM
  #3  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
jackygor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: VANCOUVER BC
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
delays and more delays.

Business as usually at Mitsubishi I see.
Old Dec 12, 2007, 12:09 PM
  #4  
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (28)
 
atombomb33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 2,471
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
OUCH!!! Especially the MR. A fully-optioned MR will be over $40K. Damn...

BTW, that's the exact pricing my dealer told me nearly a month ago. Looks like my dealer finally got something right...

The delays are also troubling...especially for the MR...looks like the initial reports of problems with SST are pushing back the arrival date...
Old Dec 12, 2007, 12:10 PM
  #5  
Evolved Member
 
blitzkrieg79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Dirty Jersey
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=312878
Old Dec 12, 2007, 12:44 PM
  #6  
Evolving Member
 
kilgoja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
costs too much!...a new gsr with sss package and such would cost more than my ix mr......puke...and it still wouldn't have the bilstein shocks
Old Dec 12, 2007, 01:17 PM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
eddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kilgoja
costs too much!...a new gsr with sss package and such would cost more than my ix mr......puke...and it still wouldn't have the bilstein shocks
Yeah but it's still cheaper then a new STi at $36,000.
Old Dec 12, 2007, 02:05 PM
  #8  
Newbie
 
msatchmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Detroit
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow... anyone else shocked at the MPG? That's worse than a heavy *** Dodge Charger with a giant V8.
Old Dec 12, 2007, 02:10 PM
  #9  
Newbie
 
Eric Keely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: VA
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Man, and I thought my Evo VIII has bad MPG, X is even worse!
Old Dec 12, 2007, 02:12 PM
  #10  
Evolving Member
 
jperryrocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: nc
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EPA re-did all the stats for 2008. Most every car manufactuer lost 2 MPG compared to 2007 models. http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/findacar.htm

The old 6 speed car was rated 18/24 back in 2006. Had this same car been rated today, it would have 16/22 on the window sticker.

Do some research before you start to complain.

Last edited by jperryrocks; Dec 12, 2007 at 02:19 PM.
Old Dec 12, 2007, 02:20 PM
  #11  
Newbie
 
OniKoroshi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn't think the mpg would be so low. Is this similar to the IX?
Old Dec 12, 2007, 02:28 PM
  #12  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
pltek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 2 places
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BAMMO

Originally Posted by jperryrocks
EPA re-did all the stats for 2008. Most every car manufactuer lost 2 MPG compared to 2007 models. http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/findacar.htm

The old 6 speed car was rated 18/24 back in 2006. Had this same car been rated today, it would have 16/22 on the window sticker.

Do some research before you start to complain.
Old Dec 12, 2007, 02:29 PM
  #13  
Evolving Member
 
EzeE1o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: the bay, Cali
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmm..now that the $ and mpg #'s are out, i think i will go Ralliart
Old Dec 12, 2007, 02:44 PM
  #14  
Evolving Member
 
jperryrocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: nc
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Rally might get 2 mpg better, but don't expect a huge difference in fuel economy. Still a Turbo AWD car with 220-240 hp.
Old Dec 12, 2007, 02:46 PM
  #15  
Evolving Member
 
EzeE1o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: the bay, Cali
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmmm..maybe....as long as it is around 25K$ (wrx territory)


Quick Reply: Evo x pricing from Edmunds



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:39 AM.