Hey guys,

Recieved my new Car and driver mag tonight. I am so glad I placed my order two weeks ago


enjoy

 

wowwwwww

Best test so far

 

Absolutely, this IS the best test so far...haters will claim that the starts aligned just right....I"m gonna saythey finally got someone that knew how to launch an Evo


Now add the 85hp that AGP "discovered" and I"m set during the warranty period

JAmes

 

I thought the Evo X was slower in the 1/4 then the STI.... Wasn't the X 13.8 in the 1/4???

 

I fail to believe that a car that makes the same stock whp as the IX can make the same quarter-mile times but be over 300lbs heavier.

I'll trust the actual video of the IX stomping the X on the track in Top Gear until I see some US numbers from average people.

-M

 

Something is wrong, the first test the Evo X hit 100mph in 13,8seconds;Now the same Evo X hits in 12,5 seconds!
How can a heavier car with similar whp put the same performance numbers? ? ?

 

mitsu had it behind their sleeves X-FTW

 

300lb of rigidness is it in the X haters

 

Doesn't the X make more power and torque than the IX but it's offset by the increased weight?

 

None of this matters to much just up the boost and do some tuning as soon as it is possible Ive always looked at a vehicles potential not just the baseline.

 

I guess I'm not impressed with the times compared to previous evo's. Am I just crazy?

What did the IX have as a stock time with car and driver?

 

It is about time a real driver produce the correct numbers.

 

Could it be that the motor is even more underated than the IX and Mitsu finally worked out the bugs??

 

I hope so those numbers look much better.

 

Only like 5hp and 11 ft pound of torque. That is far from offset