Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.

normal gsr vs. aero package ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 6, 2008, 05:49 PM
  #16  
Newbie
 
Archangel621's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KingLou
Is it just my imagination, or does the white one without the "aero" package have a taller wing? If so, is a shorter wing part of the "aero" package, or is the wing chosen separately?

KiL
The wing is part of the SSS package for the GSR...aero package is different.

I think the wing is standard on the MR.
Old Feb 6, 2008, 05:55 PM
  #17  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
EmanantEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KingLou
Is it just my imagination, or does the white one without the "aero" package have a taller wing? If so, is a shorter wing part of the "aero" package, or is the wing chosen separately?

KiL
The SSS pkg is what the tall wing comes in. The aero pkg only affects the front/rear bumpers and side moldings.
Old Feb 6, 2008, 09:41 PM
  #18  
Newbie
 
KingLou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the clarification guys. I am actually partial to the taller wing., and I'm far from sold on the aero lip and side skirts. They look a little too tacked on and conspicuous.

So, it's good to know I can easily forgo the extra 2k expense for the aero kit. I gotta have the tall wing though, cause that's kind of an Evo trademark as far as I'm concerned.

I think I have an Evo X MR (in white) sometime in my future.....w/o the aero kit. I'll put that 2k into MORE POWER.

KiL
Old Feb 6, 2008, 09:44 PM
  #19  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
badboybr09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Danbury,CT
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the side skirts look a bit ricey, but works for me. Also, they should have added the taller wing to the Aero package... just my opinion tho...
Old Feb 7, 2008, 04:53 AM
  #20  
Evolved Member
 
ToddMcF2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Boston
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Aero is ricey, cheap looking and adds height to an already too tall car. Once you lower the car all that plastic will be scraping everything in sight. Don't forget the weight!
Old Feb 7, 2008, 06:02 AM
  #21  
Evolved Member
 
Karan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ + 1

I think the car is quite aerodynamic looking to begin with, and the aero package just makes it look tacky. A stock GSR with the SSS package, simply lower it a bit, and it'll look infinitely better than that aero kit.
Old Feb 7, 2008, 04:04 PM
  #22  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (12)
 
DirectorSe7en's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^Yup, can't wait for lowering springs.
Old Feb 7, 2008, 04:15 PM
  #23  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (270)
 
Speed Element's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The Aero package will only look good if the car is lowered w/ some wider wheels/tires.

Old Feb 7, 2008, 06:42 PM
  #24  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Turboholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DirectorSe7en
EVO X Owner-2-B, what are you going to do about your name when you get an X?
EVO XI Owner-2-B?

Old Feb 7, 2008, 07:32 PM
  #25  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (12)
 
DirectorSe7en's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lmao!
Old Feb 7, 2008, 08:16 PM
  #26  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
DRAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by unowned
Save the 2000 for a Tune by EcuFlash and Portable Garmin GPS.
I have a Garmin, Sony, and Magellan portable and they all are HORRIBLE compared to the Nav in this car.

You are also looking at $2000 for Aero, $2000 for Nav, and $2000 for SSS.
Old Feb 7, 2008, 08:38 PM
  #27  
Newbie
 
Azzurri Evo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: C-bus,Ohio
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think I'm gonna go with the SSS package only. I'll add a Navi later.
Old Feb 7, 2008, 11:36 PM
  #28  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (12)
 
DirectorSe7en's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That silver Evo looks so sick!
Old Feb 8, 2008, 01:50 AM
  #29  
Newbie
 
Tobuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by badboybr09
the side skirts look a bit ricey, but works for me.
Yeah, I think they are okay but not great, only because it looks too 'tacked on'... It would look awesome if they made it look more molded in, or made it one piece.
Old Feb 8, 2008, 02:47 AM
  #30  
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
FutureITR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: 626 So Cal
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks dope.


Quick Reply: normal gsr vs. aero package ?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:18 PM.