Theres no denying the X looks the Best...
#16
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Boise, ID ->>> Concord, CA
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Its completely a matter of personal taste. I personally think the IX has more character - you won't get it confused with a base lancer. The X is more aggressive, but not as differentiable from its brethren. Its also a very chunky, which doesnt look bad, but doesnt seem as rally-esque as the IX which looks more like a car that was built with ultimate function in mind. I'm more of a function over form kind of guy, which probably explains my preference.
#17
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
I checkout the X and did not like the new look....like I did when I checked out the IX few yrs back. I got this feeling of like love at first sight when I see my IX the 1st time I did not get that feeling when I checkout the X. Maybe when the updated XI version comes out I'll see if my feeling will change.
#18
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dana Point, Ca.
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well the choice of words "Theres no denying" is undeniably going to cause a heated debate between the IX and before and X owners. I'm definetely denying your statement. To me the IX is the more youthful looking car and that is how I feel when I see it compared to the X. Even if I had a choice between a new Ix and X my chioce would with out a doubt go to the Ix just because it looks so much more aggressive and nimble. I think the X favors a different group that has something different in mind then the IX and prior models. I think if I never new about the Evolution and saw the X driving down the road I'd be like oh nice car. But if I saw the IX fly by me I'd be like, what the hell was that! Thats the difference for me.
#21
Account Disabled
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: 714/949/562
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 8/9 just looks more aggresive, the X looks too much like the lancer....OH WAIT....I SEE AN INTERCOOLER!!!
#27
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok let me rephrase it, if you look at the two cars together in the link (page 1)and ask girls and non tuner guys which car they like better, i believe it would overwelmingly for the X .
Last edited by kinloch99; Feb 29, 2008 at 06:41 PM.
#28
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
i buying this type of car for myself, and not for girls... If you do that, you are on the wrong page.
As far as girls , for $35 + you can buy the chick magnet easy. The evo is not a chick magnet by any means.
The evo is a tuner car, period. What do you think why the car have hidden potential from day one /evo 1/
If you are not tuner, you also picked the wrong car, as same as above i was reffering for the girls.
As far as girls , for $35 + you can buy the chick magnet easy. The evo is not a chick magnet by any means.
The evo is a tuner car, period. What do you think why the car have hidden potential from day one /evo 1/
If you are not tuner, you also picked the wrong car, as same as above i was reffering for the girls.
#29
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: DE
Posts: 2,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i buying this type of car for myself, and not for girls... If you do that, you are on the wrong page.
As far as girls , for $35 + you can buy the chick magnet easy. The evo is not a chick magnet by any means.
The evo is a tuner car, period. What do you think why the car have hidden potential from day one /evo 1/
If you are not tuner, you also picked the wrong car, as same as above i was reffering for the girls.
As far as girls , for $35 + you can buy the chick magnet easy. The evo is not a chick magnet by any means.
The evo is a tuner car, period. What do you think why the car have hidden potential from day one /evo 1/
If you are not tuner, you also picked the wrong car, as same as above i was reffering for the girls.