Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Aerodynamics for LANCER EVOLUTION X

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 05:05 PM
  #1  
NZEvox's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
Aerodynamics for LANCER EVOLUTION X

Found this PDF. Has a few interesting bits
http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/cor...008/20e_08.pdf

Last edited by NZEvox; Feb 10, 2010 at 07:51 PM.
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 05:07 PM
  #2  
Alexander's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
From: New York
Very cool.
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 05:40 PM
  #3  
Kisada's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
good info there. i need me some under car airflow guides now!

also making me rethink going wingless lol
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 05:57 PM
  #4  
evojanoy's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: MIAMI
Nice this is a great find.... Thanks
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 08:21 PM
  #5  
Evo Andy's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: 518
I'm glad I got the Aero Kit now.
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 10:58 PM
  #6  
4drboost's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
From: ATX
Originally Posted by Evo Andy
I'm glad I got the Aero Kit now.

Worth the extra $2k
Old Nov 24, 2008 | 09:35 AM
  #7  
smgevo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 303
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
It doesn't appear to show the aero kit in this literature. Only the tall wing. This article also does not show the tranny cooler ducting which is horrible.

Interested in knowing the drag and downforce differences between the short and tall wing and if the studied this.
Old Nov 24, 2008 | 11:04 AM
  #8  
spdracerut's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,323
Likes: 34
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Originally Posted by smgevo
It doesn't appear to show the aero kit in this literature. Only the tall wing. This article also does not show the tranny cooler ducting which is horrible.
Curious as to why you consider the ducting to the transmission 'horrible'? Looks effective enough to me. Even the fins on the transmission case look curved to maximize the use of the flow.
Old Nov 24, 2008 | 01:09 PM
  #9  
FLK's Avatar
FLK
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
From: CNY
Originally Posted by smgevo
It doesn't appear to show the aero kit in this literature. Only the tall wing. This article also does not show the tranny cooler ducting which is horrible.

Interested in knowing the drag and downforce differences between the short and tall wing and if the studied this.
Don't have data on the wing, but as far as the aero kit:
Stock Evo X Cd: 0.35
Aero Kit reduces Cd by 2.4% (insignificant).

The front air dam and skirts add +13.2 lbs of force in the front with -4.4 lbs of force (lift) in the rear @ 62mph and +41 lbs of force in the front with -13.2 lbs of force (lift) in the rear @ 111mph. Source is MMJP brochure.

The aero kit is not worth your hard earned $2000 by any means on public roads and i'm sure if you track often you'd rather install a splitter with canards and a proper wing.
Old Nov 24, 2008 | 04:26 PM
  #10  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,528
Likes: 48
From: Park Ridge N.J.
Originally Posted by FLK
Don't have data on the wing, but as far as the aero kit:
Stock Evo X Cd: 0.35
Aero Kit reduces Cd by 2.4% (insignificant).

The front air dam and skirts add +13.2 lbs of force in the front with -4.4 lbs of force (lift) in the rear @ 62mph and +41 lbs of force in the front with -13.2 lbs of force (lift) in the rear @ 111mph. Source is MMJP brochure.

The aero kit is not worth your hard earned $2000 by any means on public roads and i'm sure if you track often you'd rather install a splitter with canards and a proper wing.
nope not me . i will add on

Last edited by Robevo RS; Nov 24, 2008 at 04:39 PM.
Old Nov 24, 2008 | 11:43 PM
  #11  
smgevo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 303
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by spdracerut
Curious as to why you consider the ducting to the transmission 'horrible'? Looks effective enough to me. Even the fins on the transmission case look curved to maximize the use of the flow.
I was referring to the transmission oil cooler behind the fog light on the driver's side of the front bumper. The referenced diagram only shows the oil cooler. Tranny cooler has significantly less air flow directed to it as it does to the oil cooler, both which can gain significant improvement with the removal of the fog lights.
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 02:05 AM
  #12  
EvolvedVIII's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
From: Riverside, Ca
We don't have the under-body air-guides mentioned in the article.
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 10:58 AM
  #13  
Kisada's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
they are optional equipment from mitsu
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 11:48 AM
  #14  
RussellM's Avatar
Plat Vendor
iTrader: (256)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,412
Likes: 4
From: Olympia, WA
Originally Posted by EvolvedVIII
We don't have the under-body air-guides mentioned in the article.
Originally Posted by Kisada
good info there. i need me some under car airflow guides now!
These are currently JDM Parts. Mitsubishi North America actually printed these in their accessory book, but they are not available. I will have them in stock if they ever get them in the US.
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 12:03 PM
  #15  
Parikh1234's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
From: Little Ferry, NJ
nice, maybe I can use this next time I get pulled over for no front plate! Ill tell them that there is no where to put the plate that doesnt compromise my safety in handling due to downforce.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:29 AM.