Mitsubishi Evo X vs. FORD FOCUS RS & BMW 135i M Sport vs... Mustang? LOL!
#61
Evolved Member
+1. Brand loyalty gets one nowhere. I'd definitely atleast consider it if it were available. But in all honesty, I would not cross-shop it with an Evo. Probably a mazdaspeed 3. The Evo and Focus are both rally cars but achieve the results in a very very different way. In my opinion, the only Common thing about them is that they are both rally cars and they both have a turbocharger. That's it.
#62
Evolved Member
I do not know your reasoning for this, but I think your predisposition towards a mitsu is flawed. The RS was initially planned to have an AWD too. Probably not as good as the Evo, but its a possibility in the future considering they already planned and designed it with an AWD in mind.
#63
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
+1. Brand loyalty gets one nowhere. I'd definitely atleast consider it if it were available. But in all honesty, I would not cross-shop it with an Evo. Probably a mazdaspeed 3. The Evo and Focus are both rally cars but achieve the results in a very very different way. In my opinion, the only Common thing about them is that they are both rally cars and they both have a turbocharger. That's it.
Noticed you're in KOP, can't say I've seen a GG X yet.
#64
iTrader: (24)
They are two cars meant to do two different things. My point was that the Mustangs suspension does fine for what most people use it for and that is either just driving it around or drag racing. When modded, the suspension has been proven to be able to compete with IRS equipped cars on the circuit. Its not like the Mustang has all these suspension mods and all the other cars its running against are on stock susupension. Besides, it having a solid axle keeps the cost of the car down. Why change something that the buyer wants, doesn't care about, and make it more expensive?
While I agree completely that they do two different things and that no true Mustang lover would want a hotted up Focus, the Focus could do well in the USA, particularly if they'd use existing parts bin to make an AWD version.
An AWD turbo-5 Focus would be a niche car, but it would be a Mustang destroyer. Easily moddable due to factory forced induction, already built on a chassis that is one of the best handling FWD based platforms in the world, and a lot lighter weight.
There is everything to like about it. And from a purist standpoint of what a great car is about, its better than the Mustang all around. Nostalgia takes the back seat to real performance.
Not that direct injection is the end all / be all , etc.. but both Ford and GM offer DI engines (unlike Mitsu or Suby) in contrast to popular beliefs that American manufacturers have primitive technology across the board (heck even the "base" engine in the 23K Camaro will be reasonably impressive).
#67
Evolved Member
Nope.
#68
Evolved Member
Why would you bet that the Focus has better fit and finish then the Evo?
#69
El Jefe
iTrader: (1)
I wouldn't expect Mitsubishi to fix an engine with a GT37R bolted on, but Mitsubishi's attitude is "**** you, you fix it".
#70
Evolved Member
Mitsubishi voided (and still voids) warranties on essentially stock cars with little or no cause. You don't remember the hundreds of Evo 8 owners who got shafted on their entire car warranty because they went to an auto-x event or put on a turbo timer? It hasn't gotten any better from what I've gathered.
I wouldn't expect Mitsubishi to fix an engine with a GT37R bolted on, but Mitsubishi's attitude is "**** you, you fix it".
I wouldn't expect Mitsubishi to fix an engine with a GT37R bolted on, but Mitsubishi's attitude is "**** you, you fix it".
#71
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
Mitsubishi voided (and still voids) warranties on essentially stock cars with little or no cause. You don't remember the hundreds of Evo 8 owners who got shafted on their entire car warranty because they went to an auto-x event or put on a turbo timer? It hasn't gotten any better from what I've gathered.
I wouldn't expect Mitsubishi to fix an engine with a GT37R bolted on, but Mitsubishi's attitude is "**** you, you fix it".
I wouldn't expect Mitsubishi to fix an engine with a GT37R bolted on, but Mitsubishi's attitude is "**** you, you fix it".
#72
Evolved Member
#73
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
Your one of those that think American automakers still make primative engines and crappy cars and that all imports are completely flawless. You couldn't be more wrong. You heard about the Tacoma frame rust issues? Look it up cause there are about 850,000 of them being recalled and the frames basically rusting out from under them causing them to break in half.
Someone has some sense and just doesn't follow along with the American car bashing.
Because the euro Focus is a completely different car from the Focus we have here in the states. The only good thing about my Evo is the sterring wheel, seats, and shifter. Everything else is....well...plain.
The Mustang still sells great for a reason, cause its a good car that performs great, sounds great, looks is personal choice, and is affordable. I agree that if the RS was AWD it would kill the GT, but you also have the GT500 and the GT500 KR and thats not counting the ones coming out with the ECOboost and larger V8 in a few years. Not everyone autocrosses or goes to road courses. I never said it wasn't a better car, just giving the Mustang a little more credit than you and a few other people. I've owned two and they both did exactly what I wanted them to do and that was to go fast in a straight line for cheap. I can't complain one bit other than not having enough room for my two boys in the back. I'd still have my 500whp 04' if they fit back there.
why , out of extreme fanboism (or nationalism) ? Seriously I love my X , but I try to stay objective and open minded.
Quality between US and other global car manufacturers has converged in recent years and if anything I'd bet the quality on a focus and fit and finish is likely to be better than the EVO (not that is why I or anyone else buys an EVO).
I believe in giving credit where credit is due, rather than investing my sense of self worth in my car brand. I've also had US automakers fix things outside warranty (sometimes a year after it expired) on goodwill - imagine Mitsu doing something like that. Finally, generally speaking I dont believe GM or Ford get much credit for engine advances they have made. Not that direct injection is the end all / be all , etc.. but both Ford and GM offer DI engines (unlike Mitsu or Suby) in contrast to popular beliefs that American manufacturers have primitive technology across the board (heck even the "base" engine in the 23K Camaro will be reasonably impressive).
Quality between US and other global car manufacturers has converged in recent years and if anything I'd bet the quality on a focus and fit and finish is likely to be better than the EVO (not that is why I or anyone else buys an EVO).
I believe in giving credit where credit is due, rather than investing my sense of self worth in my car brand. I've also had US automakers fix things outside warranty (sometimes a year after it expired) on goodwill - imagine Mitsu doing something like that. Finally, generally speaking I dont believe GM or Ford get much credit for engine advances they have made. Not that direct injection is the end all / be all , etc.. but both Ford and GM offer DI engines (unlike Mitsu or Suby) in contrast to popular beliefs that American manufacturers have primitive technology across the board (heck even the "base" engine in the 23K Camaro will be reasonably impressive).
Turd polish is good stuff. You can make anything fast, but there are infinitely better choices out there for a track star than a Mustang.
While I agree completely that they do two different things and that no true Mustang lover would want a hotted up Focus, the Focus could do well in the USA, particularly if they'd use existing parts bin to make an AWD version.
An AWD turbo-5 Focus would be a niche car, but it would be a Mustang destroyer. Easily moddable due to factory forced induction, already built on a chassis that is one of the best handling FWD based platforms in the world, and a lot lighter weight.
There is everything to like about it. And from a purist standpoint of what a great car is about, its better than the Mustang all around. Nostalgia takes the back seat to real performance.
While I agree completely that they do two different things and that no true Mustang lover would want a hotted up Focus, the Focus could do well in the USA, particularly if they'd use existing parts bin to make an AWD version.
An AWD turbo-5 Focus would be a niche car, but it would be a Mustang destroyer. Easily moddable due to factory forced induction, already built on a chassis that is one of the best handling FWD based platforms in the world, and a lot lighter weight.
There is everything to like about it. And from a purist standpoint of what a great car is about, its better than the Mustang all around. Nostalgia takes the back seat to real performance.
#74
Evolved Member
Because the euro Focus is a completely different car from the Focus we have here in the states. The only good thing about my Evo is the sterring wheel, seats, and shifter. Everything else is....well...plain.
No.
Last edited by GPTourer; Mar 11, 2009 at 08:14 AM.
#75
El Jefe
iTrader: (1)
I've had some really good service experiences and some really bad ones, regardless of brand. But in my experience, Ford dealers/RSMs are better about honoring warranty claims than Mitsubishi, which is at or near the bottom when it comes to service...