Realistic difference b/w 3" and 3.5" intercooler core?
Jul 16, 2012, 09:42 PM
#16
Evolving Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: calgary,canada
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I run the UR fmic on mine which is 4.5 inch thick, it barely fits in all directions. Apart from garbage fitment.
On the dyno however you are able to hold the Ic as they do pulls and it never heats up. Even after long track sprints it's warm but never hot to the touch
I ran it on my stock turbo and my fp red setup (which had full spool by 4k) so I don't think spool was affected really. Even stock turbo always spooled same as everyone else's or quicker.
On the dyno however you are able to hold the Ic as they do pulls and it never heats up. Even after long track sprints it's warm but never hot to the touch
I ran it on my stock turbo and my fp red setup (which had full spool by 4k) so I don't think spool was affected really. Even stock turbo always spooled same as everyone else's or quicker.
Mar 12, 2013, 10:47 PM
#17
Mar 20, 2013, 06:27 AM
#18
I remember hearing about a Garret Core ETS-built 3.8 intercooler. The claims being made in that thread were that the 3.8 with a Garret core was better than the 4.0".
Anyone else hear anything about the 3.8? I'm still trying to decide what I want.
Anyone else hear anything about the 3.8? I'm still trying to decide what I want.
Mar 27, 2013, 04:21 PM
#19
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: waipahu, hawaii
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is all pretty interesting. I debated getting the 3.5in myself. But i figured if i wasnt going to be making that much power why go bigger? Save myself the money.....but i guess it couldnt hurt going the 3.5
Mar 27, 2013, 09:41 PM
#20
20x12x3.0 Bar & Plate Core - 700hp Direct Replacement
20x12x3.5 Bar & Plate Core - 750hp Direct Replacement
20x12x4.0 Bar & Plate Core - 820hp Direct Replacement
I run the 4.0 and honestly I don't see a difference in my spool rates vs the stock intercooler.
Mar 28, 2013, 10:55 AM
#21
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: waipahu, hawaii
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This ^ Forgot where that was lol.
Jul 31, 2013, 08:06 AM
#23
Newbie
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Has anyone seen an increase in running engine temps? I am in Texas and we get 100 deg summers so heat soak is a factor but going thicker core will also restrict flow to the radiator. Does anyone know if 3' needs modification to the radiator? I know AMS has on their site that their time attack car's temps were running higher with their 3.5' IC so they recommended a racing radiator. Dont know which to get 3' or 3.5'. Would a 3' be enough for an MHI 18k future upgrade?
Last edited by blaze2682; Jul 31, 2013 at 11:05 AM.
Jul 31, 2013, 09:54 AM
#24
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: TeXas
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^^ Texas too, San Antonio, I just brought an AMS IC to replace the stocker, noticed the car was starting to use it's built in turbo timer or w/e they name it. That wasn't the reason to buy the IC of course, but I'm sure it'll help. Can't speak on performance just yet, bunch of parts to be put on for the tune!
Jul 31, 2013, 10:24 AM
#25
alright so i have a friend running a 3.5 ETS and a friend running the 4 ETS...they both have the same mods and my friend with the 4 inch has more power...so I say go with the 4 inch
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Blakesterone
Evo How To Requests / Questions / Tips
0
Aug 6, 2016 02:45 PM
FS[Northeast]: Buschur "Race Core" Intercooler Core
MisUnderStood
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
1
Apr 28, 2016 07:37 PM
1091x
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
2
Jan 8, 2016 02:18 PM
EriCS
Vendor Service / Parts / Tuning Review
75
Dec 12, 2009 07:24 AM
