Vortex generator is it worth it?
#16
#19
#22
By that logic, the vents in the Colt's side-skirts must have a function, too. By that logic, the horrendous rear diffuser on a Colt Evo X must be magically better than the OE diffuser.
I'm not saying that their cars aren't fast. But I'm not about to jump to conclusion that everything Colt does is functional because their cars are fast. Especially when Mitsu has published the wind-tunnel data to show that the Evo X does not need and will suffer from the addition of VGs.
I'm not saying that their cars aren't fast. But I'm not about to jump to conclusion that everything Colt does is functional because their cars are fast. Especially when Mitsu has published the wind-tunnel data to show that the Evo X does not need and will suffer from the addition of VGs.
Anywho, I'm sure Mitsu Japan knows best.. but I'd also hope that Mitsu UK / Colt Car Co and WRC Developments that designed the FQ400 weren't just adding aero do-dads for the hell of it. 2 of the guys from WRC Dev worked for both Prodrive and the Subaru WRC program.
Wind tunnel data on the FQ400 would be nice, but all I found was this info from the Mitsu UK / WRC Dev press pack (PDF LINK)..
The rear of the FQ-400 features a distinctively shaped centrally mounted exhaust finisher and carbon fibre rear diffuser that’s designed to create better airflow around the rear of the car. The rear wing features a gurney strip addition, while a roof-mounted toothed ‘Vortex Generator’ assists in airflow management at the rear of the Evolution X FQ-400.
And some food for thought.. in Mitsu's published wind-tunnel data that you mentioned, half the dang article is about their underfloor air-guides.. which are $900, not a USDM option at all, and only available if you import them from Japan.
#23
#24
#25
^^ Yeah, the APR is probably the nicest one being made, but it's around $300.
It's weird.. I'm not all that crazy about the look of a VG on the X, and I'm starting to believe Iowa that we probably don't need them.. but for same strange reason, I still kinda want one. Lol.
Kinda wonder if it has enough effect on drag to effect MPG either negatively or positively?
It's weird.. I'm not all that crazy about the look of a VG on the X, and I'm starting to believe Iowa that we probably don't need them.. but for same strange reason, I still kinda want one. Lol.
Kinda wonder if it has enough effect on drag to effect MPG either negatively or positively?
#26
The other issue is whether VGs will help or hurt the functioning of the rear wing. If you have some aftermarket wing at least 10-12" over the trunk surface, then have at it. But with either of the OE wings on an Evo X, VGs up on the roof will almost definitely cause the wing to cease doing what it's supposed to, and just add drag, instead. That's the difference between the X and previous Evos. The previous roofline, with the steeper rear window, made it hard for the OE wing to function. In those cases, VGs helped the wing to work. An Evo X's wing needs no help because of the slope to the rear edge of the roof and the softer angle of the rear window.
#28
But what if you add stickers to the VG??
( Photo by BKevoX - https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...oto-shoot.html )
Also, I guess you can actually buy OEM FQ vortex generators..
http://www.fqperformance.com/shop/pr...oducts_id=1791
( Photo by BKevoX - https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...oto-shoot.html )
Also, I guess you can actually buy OEM FQ vortex generators..
http://www.fqperformance.com/shop/pr...oducts_id=1791
#29
The OEM VG works, but you all seem to have the wrong end of the stick. Vortex Generators are drag reduction devices, they are not for downforce!
The OEM device has offset fins, to help with the production of said Vortex' ...... other the ARP VG has straight veins, so I suspect that it is not so effective.
The OEM device has offset fins, to help with the production of said Vortex' ...... other the ARP VG has straight veins, so I suspect that it is not so effective.
#30
In the case of an older Evo, the VGs on the roof were there to keep the airflow clean over the trunk. This reduced lift from the trunk and made the wing work better. In the case of an Evo X, no VGs are needed because the flow of air across the trunk is not breaking up and needs no help.
With regard to drag, please note that VGs, themselves, always add drag. There is never a free lunch. In some cases, yes, the downstream gains outweigh the immediate effect of the VGs, so total drag might go down. But often you are trading drag for some other benefit, which is usually a gain in the effectiveness of some deflector. The upshot, with regard to drag is this: If your car doesn't need VGs for some other purpose, then you don't want them. Before you put VGs on the roof of an X, ask yourself what you hope to gain from then.