Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.

which downpipe?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 15, 2013, 06:30 PM
  #16  
Evolving Member
 
Wicked_White10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd go with MAP but then again..I'm biased..They're about 30 minutes from my house lol.
Old May 15, 2013, 06:46 PM
  #17  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
tellme718's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: new york city
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Downpipe isn't necessary with stock turbo.
Old May 16, 2013, 06:03 AM
  #18  
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
FearDavid0586's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tellme718
Downpipe isn't necessary with stock turbo.

I disagree, I believe dynos have proven that the factory DP is extremely restrictive and the aftermarket DPs increase HP and TQ pretty significantly. Thats 1 of the 4 reasons a TBE and tune open the Evos so much.

Just my 2 cents tho.
Old May 16, 2013, 11:44 AM
  #19  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Iowa999's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Iowa City
Posts: 4,961
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
If this is going to become a serious discussion, please start citing sources. Thanks.
Old May 16, 2013, 03:07 PM
  #20  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
tellme718's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: new york city
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I read this...

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...zero-gain.html

Seems like they created a new DP that gives actual gains because of the O2 bung. But from my research the gains are minimal when not combined with an entire exhaust. Seems like it creates a faster spool but as far as actual gains...it doesn't justify the price. For a price tag of $470+S&H, on a stock turbo, you won't get the full benefits. That money can be used for a good tune.

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ock-turbo.html

Here Kracka shows 9whp peak with a downpipe from MAP with other mods. $370+S&H.
Again this is also eliminating the O2 sensor. I don't like this for obvious reasons like the emissions complications every year for inspection, altering the factory ECU even more by shutting down O2 sensors thus killing the warranty even more and just being that much louder.

I'll upgrade if and when I upgrade the turbo. I'm not a dyno queen.

Last edited by tellme718; May 16, 2013 at 04:18 PM.
Old May 16, 2013, 08:39 PM
  #21  
Newbie
 
spatel133's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ETS open Dump was always found of that. Im running AMS currently since i was able to pick it up for a steal
Old May 17, 2013, 04:58 AM
  #22  
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
FearDavid0586's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess for me the biggest benefit I seen was a buddy of mine was running an catback, test pipe and stage 1 on his cobb AP, he installed an AMS DP and switched to the stage 2 map and the gains were pretty noticeable.

But we didnt have a dyno so we couldnt really get a definitive answer on paper, but it felt quicker for sure.
Old May 17, 2013, 06:36 AM
  #23  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Iowa999's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Iowa City
Posts: 4,961
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Nice post by TellMe WRT providing evidence or citations.

In contrast, this post ...

Originally Posted by FearDavid0586
I guess for me the biggest benefit I seen was a buddy of mine was running an catback, test pipe and stage 1 on his cobb AP, he installed an AMS DP and switched to the stage 2 map and the gains were pretty noticeable.
... is a great example of changing two things at once (which is called "confounding" in the scientific-methods world), which is not useful. For all we know, FearDavid's buddy would have been better off with an OE downpipe and a Stage 2 map.
Old May 17, 2013, 07:47 AM
  #24  
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
FearDavid0586's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Iowa999
Nice post by TellMe WRT providing evidence or citations.

In contrast, this post ...



... is a great example of changing two things at once (which is called "confounding" in the scientific-methods world), which is not useful. For all we know, FearDavid's buddy would have been better off with an OE downpipe and a Stage 2 map.

Doesnt Cobb not suggest running the stage 2 map unless you have the entire TBE?
Old May 17, 2013, 08:39 AM
  #25  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Roen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NYC / TO
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If so, better to just run the DP without the stage 2 tune first and see the results before putting a stage 2 map on.
Old May 17, 2013, 08:49 AM
  #26  
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
FearDavid0586's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FearDavid0586
Doesnt Cobb not suggest running the stage 2 map unless you have the entire TBE?

Sorry forgot to cite my source since this is such a serious discussion apparently. And I'll try and keep from citing any "confounding" mods so I dont get verbally reprimanded
Old May 17, 2013, 08:51 AM
  #27  
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
FearDavid0586's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
per cobb
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
Stage2+AMS 91 v107.pdf (274.4 KB, 0 views)
Old May 17, 2013, 10:21 AM
  #28  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Iowa999's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Iowa City
Posts: 4,961
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by FearDavid0586
Sorry forgot to cite my source since this is such a serious discussion apparently. And I'll try and keep from citing any "confounding" mods so I dont get verbally reprimanded
Note to self: "self, don't forget to include KY (for some reason) when trying to explain how to collect good data."
Old May 18, 2013, 06:05 AM
  #29  
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Liftnw8ts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portsmouth, Ohio
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mmmack I would stay with your AMS TBS those parts are all engineered to work together, they will make the most power and fit properly. Pluss remember you are still on stock turbo so the benefit are no where near the cost, labor, time and headaches of switching out to a different downpipe. Yeah you will see alittle more power with an open dump, but it will come at the expense of a lot more noise, heat under your car too. Now if and when you go to a bigger turbo then decide at that time if its something you want to do. You will not go wrong with ETS parts they are excellent and probably some of the best quality parts for the money. AMS stuff is top notch too.
Old May 18, 2013, 09:53 AM
  #30  
Evolving Member
 
Gyroscope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
open dump

Last edited by Gyroscope; May 18, 2013 at 10:13 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
06RAJK
04-06 Ralliart General
6
Oct 29, 2016 09:58 AM
MR_mike
For Sale - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
15
Feb 23, 2014 08:21 AM
ahendrickson
Evo X How Tos / Installations
9
Apr 16, 2013 05:58 AM
Audi2Evo
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
1
Jul 17, 2010 07:38 PM
SP00LIN
Automotosports - Illinois
7
Oct 6, 2006 07:39 AM



Quick Reply: which downpipe?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:11 AM.