What 9.5 fits without rolling fenders?
#1
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What 9.5 fits without rolling fenders?
I know it seems like a simple question, but I read through every wheel thread in the forums. What it seems like more than +22 (as in approaching 30) has the best chance to fit without rubbing and less will probably rub (it seems you have about 25mm clearance from where the stock wheel fits to the fender before rubbing). I also know tire width and selection makes a big difference, but what would fit without rubbing on a mild 1" drop? Is it simply sticking with the narrower tires?
My goal is wheels around $2000 in 9.5" width that can fit without rubbing or using spacers (the less spokes the better, easier to clean). I would like to use 255/40 (would seem to give me better RPMS when cruising).
The best chance of fitting that I've seen is possibly the Work CR Ultimate 18 x 9.5" +30. The Work XT7s also come in a +30, but is not listed as fitting on Works Japanese website, but the CR Ultimates are listed as fitting in a +30.
Any suggestions?
(By the way, this site is awesome: www.willtheyfit.com)
My goal is wheels around $2000 in 9.5" width that can fit without rubbing or using spacers (the less spokes the better, easier to clean). I would like to use 255/40 (would seem to give me better RPMS when cruising).
The best chance of fitting that I've seen is possibly the Work CR Ultimate 18 x 9.5" +30. The Work XT7s also come in a +30, but is not listed as fitting on Works Japanese website, but the CR Ultimates are listed as fitting in a +30.
Any suggestions?
(By the way, this site is awesome: www.willtheyfit.com)
#3
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you are asking from a tire perspective because 245s are a little stretched and 265s have a higher probability of rubbing? Plus I was thinking the 255/40s would be a slightly taller tire within the wheels specs to eak out a few more rpms in each gear.
From a wheel perspective I chose 9.5" because there are not a lot of 9" wheels with good offsets and because 10" seems too big.
From a wheel perspective I chose 9.5" because there are not a lot of 9" wheels with good offsets and because 10" seems too big.
#6
Evolving Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wine Country and High Desert, CA
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Definitely tire first...not all 255's are 255's...ala Federal, Hankook, etc with the oversized size from true size lol...stack 255's from different companies together, and it may be hilarious...
#7
iTrader: (24)
I have 18*9.5 +22 running 265/35 Michelin Pilot Super Sports, and have never rubbed with -1.2 degrees of camber in the rear. I had some +15 RPF1s on with the exact same tires, and they rubbed instantly.
You should be good with +22 all day.
I agree with Iowa that they'll look stretched. If you don't care about running 265w rubber, get 9" wheels. They'll be lighter and cost you less money.
You should be good with +22 all day.
I agree with Iowa that they'll look stretched. If you don't care about running 265w rubber, get 9" wheels. They'll be lighter and cost you less money.
Trending Topics
#9
Not real confidence inspiring.
Sigh.
#10
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Sometimes I'm lazy and don't write out everything that I'm thinking when posting. (I also sometimes don't do it because I don't want to be any more annoying than I usually am and/or don't want to admit to certain assumptions that I'm making.)
There are times to run 9.5"-wide wheels with tires that an thinner than 265. Many of the competitive Evos in STU run wheels this wide with their (mandated-maximum) 245s, because certain tires actually have better lateral grip on wider wheels (e.g., 'Kook R-S3s), at least when pumped up to near 40 psi. I didn't say this cause the OP said 255s, so I knew that he or she wasn't setting the car up for cone-dodging. I made the assumption -- hee haw, hee haw -- that he was after looks and, maybe, street comfort. The car will be more comfortable and safe on 9"-wide wheels.
And it took me 10 seconds to find a bunch of 18x9s with the right offset, so I suggested that he or she look again.
There are times to run 9.5"-wide wheels with tires that an thinner than 265. Many of the competitive Evos in STU run wheels this wide with their (mandated-maximum) 245s, because certain tires actually have better lateral grip on wider wheels (e.g., 'Kook R-S3s), at least when pumped up to near 40 psi. I didn't say this cause the OP said 255s, so I knew that he or she wasn't setting the car up for cone-dodging. I made the assumption -- hee haw, hee haw -- that he was after looks and, maybe, street comfort. The car will be more comfortable and safe on 9"-wide wheels.
And it took me 10 seconds to find a bunch of 18x9s with the right offset, so I suggested that he or she look again.
#12
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just wish I could find a shop who will do tires/wheels and a mild rolling (265x40x18). NorCal seems to be particularly hard place to find folks willing to do both. You get the standard disclaimer along the lines of, "we can do it, but if we efff it up, we don't fix it".
Not real confidence inspiring.
Sigh.
Not real confidence inspiring.
Sigh.
#14
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sometimes I'm lazy and don't write out everything that I'm thinking when posting. (I also sometimes don't do it because I don't want to be any more annoying than I usually am and/or don't want to admit to certain assumptions that I'm making.)
There are times to run 9.5"-wide wheels with tires that an thinner than 265. Many of the competitive Evos in STU run wheels this wide with their (mandated-maximum) 245s, because certain tires actually have better lateral grip on wider wheels (e.g., 'Kook R-S3s), at least when pumped up to near 40 psi. I didn't say this cause the OP said 255s, so I knew that he or she wasn't setting the car up for cone-dodging. I made the assumption -- hee haw, hee haw -- that he was after looks and, maybe, street comfort. The car will be more comfortable and safe on 9"-wide wheels.
And it took me 10 seconds to find a bunch of 18x9s with the right offset, so I suggested that he or she look again.
There are times to run 9.5"-wide wheels with tires that an thinner than 265. Many of the competitive Evos in STU run wheels this wide with their (mandated-maximum) 245s, because certain tires actually have better lateral grip on wider wheels (e.g., 'Kook R-S3s), at least when pumped up to near 40 psi. I didn't say this cause the OP said 255s, so I knew that he or she wasn't setting the car up for cone-dodging. I made the assumption -- hee haw, hee haw -- that he was after looks and, maybe, street comfort. The car will be more comfortable and safe on 9"-wide wheels.
And it took me 10 seconds to find a bunch of 18x9s with the right offset, so I suggested that he or she look again.