Notices
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules New member? Come on in, introduce yourself, and get acquainted with the evolutionm.net posse :) FAQs will also be answered in here.

Why are the 2005s so much quicker and faster than the 2003s/2004s?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 25, 2005, 12:31 AM
  #151  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (56)
 
Jakeg97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Western NY
Posts: 11,132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
nice street race ^^^^^^
Old Jun 25, 2005, 03:27 AM
  #152  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr.MR
I raced my friends 04' a couple of times last night. Here's the breakdown; he has the VIII with safc, 3" tbe/no cat, K&N round direct mount filter. I have the 05' MR with just a HKS 30th catback. To take out any variables, we went from a 10 roll so no launching was involved. We counted to 3 and floored it. As soon as we hit the gas I pulled about 1 car on him. It stayed the same for the most part after that, maybe I gained another car on him by 80mph. We tried again and the same thing happened until he missed 3rd gear. I wasn't powershifting at all, actually shifting rather slowly.

I am thinking the instant car length I pulled is one of two things. Either the gears in the MR are shorter in 1st, or his full TBE is hurting his low end tq. I thought the gears are the same until 4th in the 5 and 6 speeds, but I'm not 100% sure?
No, the gears are shorter in the early gears. 4th also runs out at 111mph for us, whereas they can go to 120+ in 4th.
Old Jun 25, 2005, 04:04 PM
  #153  
Evolving Member
 
Mr.MR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chi-town burbs
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course not, we were on a sanctioned track. Of course this was not a racetrack and we were not being timed(tongue out to Mitsu). I would never street race, especially against a friend who is a law officer.

So I guess the gears gave me the jump on him in the first 100ft. How come he still couldn't pull on me though? Oops, I just remembered he has the SSL package. We are the same weight, so his car should outweigh mine by about 75lbs. That would give me a car on him right there.
Old Jun 26, 2005, 04:49 AM
  #154  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Greyfox5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by App420
you are talking it a little to far.. can run mid 12's without cams or a flash
yeah u cant hit 12's nor attempt to hit 11's without that setup. i have an 05 and its not that much diff stock.
Old Jun 26, 2005, 08:21 AM
  #155  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Greyfox5
yeah u cant hit 12's nor attempt to hit 11's without that setup. i have an 05 and its not that much diff stock.
Where have you been? You must have missed all the recent timeslips posted, namely mine.

Can't hit 12s without that setup? 05 is not much diff stock? You can hit 12s on a stock 05, first of all, so you can hit 12s without ANY setup. Secondly, 2 of us have hit 12.2@111-112 with just exhaust and afc (one with, one without mbc). 03/04s can't get close to 12s in stock form, because 05s have 20 more whp on average. The only thing keeping me from 11s without cams (or flash) is my 6spd being limited to 111mph in 4th.
Old Jun 26, 2005, 08:59 AM
  #156  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
EvoTio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: L.A.
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Where have you been? You must have missed all the recent timeslips posted, namely mine.

Can't hit 12s without that setup? 05 is not much diff stock? You can hit 12s on a stock 05, first of all, so you can hit 12s without ANY setup. Secondly, 2 of us have hit 12.2@111-112 with just exhaust and afc (one with, one without mbc). 03/04s can't get close to 12s in stock form, because 05s have 20 more whp on average. The only thing keeping me from 11s without cams (or flash) is my 6spd being limited to 111mph in 4th.
Actually, some 03's have run 12's bone stock. I believe Malibu Jack was one of them. I definitely was not one of them, especially in the land of 91 octane.
Old Jun 26, 2005, 09:04 AM
  #157  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by EvoTio
Actually, some 03's have run 12's bone stock. I believe Malibu Jack was one of them. I definitely was not one of them, especially in the land of 91 octane.
Perhaps a few have, but they would be incredible anomalies aided by perfect conditions and perfect driving. The stock 03 can only do 101-102mph in the 1/4, and since the stock clutch is so weak, 1.6 60's are incredibly unlikely, so that's just not enough to get 12s. The few who may have done had something in their favor, whether it be a slightly stronger stock Evo, great track conditions, or they are just incredible drivers. With an 05, just about anyone can hit a 12.9x if they get the launch right, so it's a matter of averages. On average, 05s hit 13.1@104 while 03/04s hit 13.4@101. That indicates a significant and measurable difference in power with maybe some improved shifting involved.
Old Jun 26, 2005, 09:14 AM
  #158  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
EvoTio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: L.A.
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Perhaps a few have, but they would be incredible anomalies aided by perfect conditions and perfect driving. The stock 03 can only do 101-102mph in the 1/4, and since the stock clutch is so weak, 1.6 60's are incredibly unlikely, so that's just not enough to get 12s. The few who may have done had something in their favor, whether it be a slightly stronger stock Evo, great track conditions, or they are just incredible drivers. With an 05, just about anyone can hit a 12.9x if they get the launch right, so it's a matter of averages. On average, 05s hit 13.1@104 while 03/04s hit 13.4@101. That indicates a significant and measurable difference in power with maybe some improved shifting involved.
This is true, just wanted to point out that it has been done. The trap speeds alone on the 05's show that they are about 20 horse power or so stronger than the 03/04's. I am curious what the 05's are putting down on our terrible 91 octane here in California.
Old Jun 26, 2005, 09:23 AM
  #159  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
fromWRXtoEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tucson
Posts: 6,087
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
When I first got my 05 MR, I got two friends with a 04 Evo that want me to compare them. My bone stock 05 MR was equal from a 30-110mph roll than my buddy red 04 with a B&B Turboback(no cat) and cone filter, more over my gas tank was absolutely full and his was in reserve.


I haven't rematch the person again but just think about this, his car full 3" TB plus CAI and less weight(100lbs less in gas alone) and my car with no mods and more weight and still equal.. WOW!!
Old Jun 26, 2005, 03:54 PM
  #160  
Evolving Member
 
Mr.MR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chi-town burbs
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
The only thing keeping me from 11s without cams (or flash) is my 6spd being limited to 111mph in 4th.
I keep seeing you post this problem. I have the RT615's in 245/45 on my MR now. I keep thinking I should get the 255/40's since they are .6 inches shorter and will keep my gearing nice and short. I am more interested in 0-100 than 100+mph, so the 255/40's seem to be the right choice for me. You, on the other hand might benifit from the taller gearing Warrtalon. You could see 11's at well over 111mph. Now if your more interested in auto-xing then the point is moot I guess. Just my .02.
Old Jun 26, 2005, 03:57 PM
  #161  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr.MR
I keep seeing you post this problem. I have the RT615's in 245/45 on my MR now. I keep thinking I should get the 255/40's since they are .6 inches shorter and will keep my gearing nice and short. I am more interested in 0-100 than 100+mph, so the 255/40's seem to be the right choice for me. You, on the other hand might benifit from the taller gearing Warrtalon. You could see 11's at well over 111mph. Now if your more interested in auto-xing then the point is moot I guess. Just my .02.
Yes, this was mentioned as a potential work-around for the 111mph problem, but I have yet to see it in action. I'm waiting for someone to eclipse 111mph with the stock rev limiter in an MR with taler tires. If it works, then I may try it one day, but that would only be to prove I can hit 11s, not to compete. I am only interested in auto-x and road racing for the long term...
Old Jun 26, 2005, 07:42 PM
  #162  
Evolving Member
 
Mr.MR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chi-town burbs
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had a feeling your more autocross then straight line. Well, if I keep the 245's I'll have to let you know what happens. Do you think the height will hurt my launch or 1st,2nd, and 3rd gear speed alot? The tires are rated at 245=806rpm vs. 255=825rpm. I don't want to lose the advantage the 6-speed gives us.
Old Jun 26, 2005, 07:57 PM
  #163  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr.MR
I had a feeling your more autocross then straight line. Well, if I keep the 245's I'll have to let you know what happens. Do you think the height will hurt my launch or 1st,2nd, and 3rd gear speed alot? The tires are rated at 245=806rpm vs. 255=825rpm. I don't want to lose the advantage the 6-speed gives us.
No clue on that at all...
Old Jun 27, 2005, 05:10 AM
  #164  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Knyght's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr.MR
I had a feeling your more autocross then straight line. Well, if I keep the 245's I'll have to let you know what happens. Do you think the height will hurt my launch or 1st,2nd, and 3rd gear speed alot? The tires are rated at 245=806rpm vs. 255=825rpm. I don't want to lose the advantage the 6-speed gives us.
245 and 255 has 'almost' nothing to do with 'height'

The typical stats are as follows for example "245/45/17"

245 is the width in mm of the contact patch, 45 is the height(which is technically the aspect ratio of the width, so it's 45% of 245) and 17 inches for the rim.

So a 245/45/17 tire shows a total height of 220.5mm + 17 inches. Convert/add and you have total height.

A 255/40/17 would have 204mm + 17 inches. Thus would be a smaller overall height.

If you went with a taller overall diameter you would be able get a higher trap speed on the same gearing. The taller diameter would make your gearing longer. So if you had alot of power that wraps up too fast in those lower gears, then a longer rpm range could benefit you, along with better 60 foots. But I dont think a taller overall height would help an otherwise stock car. Then again, if shifting isn't a downfall for your driving skills, a smaller height would let you be able to get into another gear well before the end of the track. It just really depends on how desperate you are. Gearing changes happen on race cars all the time, just depends on what you need at the time.

For instance, as warrtalon stated he is limited at around 111. If he really wanted to he could go with taller tires and possibly make a higher trap speed. Unless he continues to mod his car, then he might benefit from smaller tires. He seems to be right at the edge of his gearing/current power. But, unless you are very serious about drag racing it's prolly not worth worrying about on a nice street car. Buy yourself a junker DSM to play with

Hope this helps with your gearing/drag concerns.
Old Jun 27, 2005, 12:29 PM
  #165  
Evolving Member
 
Mr.MR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chi-town burbs
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Knyght
245 and 255 has 'almost' nothing to do with 'height'

The typical stats are as follows for example "245/45/17"

245 is the width in mm of the contact patch, 45 is the height(which is technically the aspect ratio of the width, so it's 45% of 245) and 17 inches for the rim.

So a 245/45/17 tire shows a total height of 220.5mm + 17 inches. Convert/add and you have total height.

A 255/40/17 would have 204mm + 17 inches. Thus would be a smaller overall height.

If you went with a taller overall diameter you would be able get a higher trap speed on the same gearing. The taller diameter would make your gearing longer. So if you had alot of power that wraps up too fast in those lower gears, then a longer rpm range could benefit you, along with better 60 foots. But I dont think a taller overall height would help an otherwise stock car. Then again, if shifting isn't a downfall for your driving skills, a smaller height would let you be able to get into another gear well before the end of the track. It just really depends on how desperate you are. Gearing changes happen on race cars all the time, just depends on what you need at the time.

For instance, as warrtalon stated he is limited at around 111. If he really wanted to he could go with taller tires and possibly make a higher trap speed. Unless he continues to mod his car, then he might benefit from smaller tires. He seems to be right at the edge of his gearing/current power. But, unless you are very serious about drag racing it's prolly not worth worrying about on a nice street car. Buy yourself a junker DSM to play with

Hope this helps with your gearing/drag concerns.
I don't get it. You are saying the same things as I did. I know exactly what the sidewall height is for the tires. I understand what all the #'s mean. The thing is, I want to know how much effect the taller tire(245/45=25.6" od) vs. the shorter tire(255/40=25" od) will effect the 6-speeds quick gearing. I'm thankful for your help, but we're saying the same thing. I agree that it just depends on the situation and what the car is used for. The thing I'm thinking is that the MR 6-speed should be able to pull away from the 5-speed with the exact same power and same tire height. I don't want to have taller tires that take away the gearing advantage in the low gears, and make the handling less precise due to taller sidewalls. Once again, I appreciate the help, but we are on the same page already.

Last edited by Mr.MR; Jun 27, 2005 at 12:48 PM.


Quick Reply: Why are the 2005s so much quicker and faster than the 2003s/2004s?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:16 AM.