Why are the 2005s so much quicker and faster than the 2003s/2004s?
this guy.
Jun 22, 2005, 10:58 AM
#78
Not too sure about the 10.5 hotside but I personally think the 05 is running better in the 1/4 due to better shifting response\feel on the 05. I'm sure 
change the maps slightly.
All I can say is that shifting on the 03 sucks!!!! Even after chaning fluids, Clutch line, etc it still is
Only if this crap was like my honda. 
Powershifting??? Don't try that on an 03
change the maps slightly. All I can say is that shifting on the 03 sucks!!!! Even after chaning fluids, Clutch line, etc it still is
Only if this crap was like my honda. Powershifting??? Don't try that on an 03
Jun 22, 2005, 11:10 AM
#81
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mike1023
ok some people have said they may have changed the cams in the 05. and yes im most likey clueless.
Please search before you open your mouth next time.
Jun 22, 2005, 11:15 AM
#83
Originally Posted by mike1023
i did and thats what someone said. they dont know fure sure becasue no one with 05 open and looked at the cams yet so they are waiting for that. gosh
Jun 22, 2005, 11:33 AM
#86
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by marksae
Wow, the amount of misinformation that floats around here is pretty amazing. I guess a lotta people here are attending Hearsay University.
...and by the looks of it, Mike1023 is teaching the class
Jun 22, 2005, 11:34 AM
#87
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: char, NC
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mike1023
i did and thats what someone said. they dont know fure sure becasue no one with 05 open and looked at the cams yet so they are waiting for that. gosh
Jun 22, 2005, 11:59 AM
#89
Warrtalon: At 3000rpm, our cars make almost no power. Every Evo may be slightly different, but not THAT much different. Look at my stock dyno chart. At 3500rpm, I was making 160awhp and 110awtq. At 3000rpm, it was WAY lower...if you extrapolate the lines, it puts me at less than 125awhp and less than 100awtq.
P[HP] = Tq[ftLb] * rpm / 5252.1
...so the Tq number is always > the HP for RPM<5252.
You also seem to confuse HP and TQ in other ways. We don't "feel" HP or power. It is the strength of the force or G's that we "feel" pressing on our butt-dynos and the force (or acceleration) is proportional to TQ. To be a little more complete, G's = const * GearRatio * TQ.
Here is a chart that shows what is going on (note: This Tq profile was taken from the SCC mag. The points are spaced every 500 RPM from 2000-7500).
Clearly there is a big drop off in acceleration around 5000-5500 RPM, but equally clearly you will be accelerating faster by reving at least to 7000 in all gears
As for mike1023, I can't be the only one curious what this wonderful job is and also out of curiousity, is English you second language?
