Which would you choose?
#16
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
go for the 06 mr , its one of the most amazing handling vehicles plenty of power, decent gas mileage(when you're stock and babying it) compared to the 3000gt and its newer and probably more dependable the 3000gt is prone to issues besides getting beat on just like the dsm's.
#18
Evolved Member
iTrader: (42)
I have a friend that has 4 3000 Gt's and he loves them for some reason What I really don't get is I haven't seen one of the 4 of them run for more than a moment with out something going wrong for as long as I have know him and that has been well over 4 years
Just Get the Evo you wont Regret it like you would the 3 grand
Just Get the Evo you wont Regret it like you would the 3 grand
#22
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
I have a friend that has 4 3000 Gt's and he loves them for some reason What I really don't get is I haven't seen one of the 4 of them run for more than a moment with out something going wrong for as long as I have know him and that has been well over 4 years
Just Get the Evo you wont Regret it like you would the 3 grand
Just Get the Evo you wont Regret it like you would the 3 grand
#24
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What the f@ck kind of question is that?! Should I get this black and white 13 inch tv. Or this 62 inch LCD? Tough choice. And what the hell is up with someone saying "evo hands damn"?? WTF? U mean down?
#25
EvoM Community Team Leader
I have personally torn down my uncles VR4 and Helped a buddy with his VR4 and that car can be a pita to work on. Very complicated, heavy, and expensive to fix. Upgrading them is way more expensive and does not yield anywhere near the performance of an evo with the same modifications. On the plus side there is a lifetime recall on the transfer case so you can blow that all you want (My buddy blew 2 on a bone stock car with ****ty tires). Rear wheels turning is cool but i guess AYC won out that battle.
#27
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Monroe - WA
Posts: 3,282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
+1 on the evo. The 3k is a heavy car. It is rare but it isn't like I see Evo's on every street corner.
BTW - to those that say Evo's get good mileage when stock, I am getting the best mileage of my ownership on my current tune - 430whp, MAF delete, VTA. I'd get even better mileage without these KDW2's (I saw an instant hit when I moved to those tires).
BTW - to those that say Evo's get good mileage when stock, I am getting the best mileage of my ownership on my current tune - 430whp, MAF delete, VTA. I'd get even better mileage without these KDW2's (I saw an instant hit when I moved to those tires).
Last edited by yahu; Sep 3, 2009 at 01:07 AM.
#29
EvoM Community Team Leader
I think mitsu was just trying to hard with the VR4? Did they wanna make a skyline killer or something? I mean active aero is cool but at what cost?
#30
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Joisey Shore
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i thought this was a joke when i first opened the thread....
VR4's IMO are garbage, my brother has one, and not one thing about that car impressed me even a little bit.
And comparing an evo to a VR4?!?!....not even close, evo out performs this car in every aspect.
EVO FTW!
VR4's IMO are garbage, my brother has one, and not one thing about that car impressed me even a little bit.
And comparing an evo to a VR4?!?!....not even close, evo out performs this car in every aspect.
EVO FTW!