What are the First 10 Best mods for a stock evo ?
#62
Originally posted by 5StarSuzuki
Example
(300Hp x .625) x 1.30Safety Margin = 243.75
Divided by 7.25 = 33.6 Gallons per hour
Always use a safety margin greater than .20
Example
(300Hp x .625) x 1.30Safety Margin = 243.75
Divided by 7.25 = 33.6 Gallons per hour
Always use a safety margin greater than .20
#63
Originally posted by Chris in HB
Hmm, not the same pump then. I guy I know did his in about 15 minutes... not likely in the fuel tank. TY for the other info, though.
Hmm, not the same pump then. I guy I know did his in about 15 minutes... not likely in the fuel tank. TY for the other info, though.
#64
I think you need a evo to put it in 1st. If you want you can install that with my cams, cam gears, and turbo back for free
Originally posted by JRock
Interesting. Is it an in-tank or in-line pump? I wonder how much of a ***** it is to drop the fuel tank on an Evo...?
Since I have a beater car I'm holding off until springtime. =)
I'll consider the options available then.
Interesting. Is it an in-tank or in-line pump? I wonder how much of a ***** it is to drop the fuel tank on an Evo...?
Since I have a beater car I'm holding off until springtime. =)
I'll consider the options available then.
#65
I will be at 350 in 2 weeks, I think the stock should be fine. I will keep a eye on the injector duty cycle as well.
Originally posted by JRock
Okay well I suck at the math, so if my goal is 350whp, what size pump should I get with a nice safety margin?
Okay well I suck at the math, so if my goal is 350whp, what size pump should I get with a nice safety margin?
#66
There all intank. Tank is underneath the rear seat-cushion. An example of a differing line booster pump would be similar to one that is placed underneath the car. (Did this on a civic, dont get me started!)
2F2F, that may not be the best idea. Frankly, without insulting you...its dumb.
JRock: The Walboro is fine and the defacto standard, make sure you get it with the install kit with a new filter, rubber bumper etc.
2F2F, that may not be the best idea. Frankly, without insulting you...its dumb.
JRock: The Walboro is fine and the defacto standard, make sure you get it with the install kit with a new filter, rubber bumper etc.
Last edited by 5StarSuzuki; Nov 30, 2003 at 09:32 PM.
#67
Originally posted by zstryder
Chris, it's the same one. It's in-tank, took me about 30min.
Chris, it's the same one. It's in-tank, took me about 30min.
#68
Originally posted by Chris in HB
Yong - you'll have to show me how you did it. When I was in Cali, I could have sworn the guy who did it said it was in-line. I stand corrected.
Yong - you'll have to show me how you did it. When I was in Cali, I could have sworn the guy who did it said it was in-line. I stand corrected.
I'm Alex, btw. But yeah, it's pretty easy.. so long as you don't mind the smell of fuel.
#70
From the dyno number's I've witnessed - upgraded intake has a negative effect on whp! So, be carefull what route you go.
As for $700-1000 gauge setups - man they look nice. But, if you're not personally tuning you're car - that's all they are is nice. Leave those to people how do their own w/o a dyno or whatever. Save the $$$ for something else.
I would think cat-back exhaust and a reflash/plug-in ECU upgrade would net the most 'bang for the buck'.
As for $700-1000 gauge setups - man they look nice. But, if you're not personally tuning you're car - that's all they are is nice. Leave those to people how do their own w/o a dyno or whatever. Save the $$$ for something else.
I would think cat-back exhaust and a reflash/plug-in ECU upgrade would net the most 'bang for the buck'.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ITEM9
West Region
3
Feb 27, 2007 02:37 PM
tsherriff
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum
8
Nov 9, 2006 03:33 PM