My car's whp on Mustang Dyno
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My car's whp on Mustang Dyno
Hey guys I tried posting this in the Parts Service & Tuning Review section, but I guess the modulator thought my posting was to vague.
Basically I wanted to see what you guys think about the power I got out of my evo 8.
So, like the title says I was tuned on a Mustang Dyno.
Here are the results:
324ish on 93 oct
355 on E85
Im guessing both maps were tuned at 27 psi.
Here are my mods:
Evo 9 stock turbo, Cams, ETS Intercooler, ETS ICP Kit, ETS Cat back, ETS Exhaust Manifold, Megan Racing Down Pipe, Invidia O2 Housing, Invidia Test Pipe, FIC BlueMax 1250 injectors, 255 Walbro Fuel Pump, Synapse DV, GrimmSpeed EBC, Omni 4 Bar Map Sensor.
Should I have made better power? Or does it sound just about right.
I was thinking I could bump up the boost on E85 to 30 psi on an Evo 9 turbo. What do you guys think?
Basically I wanted to see what you guys think about the power I got out of my evo 8.
So, like the title says I was tuned on a Mustang Dyno.
Here are the results:
324ish on 93 oct
355 on E85
Im guessing both maps were tuned at 27 psi.
Here are my mods:
Evo 9 stock turbo, Cams, ETS Intercooler, ETS ICP Kit, ETS Cat back, ETS Exhaust Manifold, Megan Racing Down Pipe, Invidia O2 Housing, Invidia Test Pipe, FIC BlueMax 1250 injectors, 255 Walbro Fuel Pump, Synapse DV, GrimmSpeed EBC, Omni 4 Bar Map Sensor.
Should I have made better power? Or does it sound just about right.
I was thinking I could bump up the boost on E85 to 30 psi on an Evo 9 turbo. What do you guys think?
#3
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stock ECU, Clutch, and Motor.
316 Torque/ 322 whp on 93 oct
346/355 on E85
Im new to this whole dyno graph thing so I might be wrong on the hitting full boost. If im right it says im hitting full boost around 3400 to 3500 rpm.
Tuned by SSP In Texas now changing their name to Kozmic Motorsports
Last edited by EvoVIII_03; Dec 8, 2012 at 08:06 PM.
#4
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
That power is pretty spot on for your mods, and being on a mustang dyno.
You got to realize that Mustang dyno's are to be considered "heart break" dynos because some claim they read lower, some claim they are more accurate to your cars power... Whichever the case may be, it seems pretty accurate with your mods.
DynoJet dyno's seem to be more inflated and read "higher" so to say. But breaking 300 on a mustang with a stock turbo is impressive, 355 on e85 is also good on E85 with stock turbo, that'd be over 400 on a dynojet
You got to realize that Mustang dyno's are to be considered "heart break" dynos because some claim they read lower, some claim they are more accurate to your cars power... Whichever the case may be, it seems pretty accurate with your mods.
DynoJet dyno's seem to be more inflated and read "higher" so to say. But breaking 300 on a mustang with a stock turbo is impressive, 355 on e85 is also good on E85 with stock turbo, that'd be over 400 on a dynojet
#5
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That power is pretty spot on for your mods, and being on a mustang dyno.
You got to realize that Mustang dyno's are to be considered "heart break" dynos because some claim they read lower, some claim they are more accurate to your cars power... Whichever the case may be, it seems pretty accurate with your mods.
DynoJet dyno's seem to be more inflated and read "higher" so to say. But breaking 300 on a mustang with a stock turbo is impressive, 355 on e85 is also good on E85 with stock turbo, that'd be over 400 on a dynojet
You got to realize that Mustang dyno's are to be considered "heart break" dynos because some claim they read lower, some claim they are more accurate to your cars power... Whichever the case may be, it seems pretty accurate with your mods.
DynoJet dyno's seem to be more inflated and read "higher" so to say. But breaking 300 on a mustang with a stock turbo is impressive, 355 on e85 is also good on E85 with stock turbo, that'd be over 400 on a dynojet
Thanks for your response
But, just so I could feel good im going to get a few pulls on a DynoJet
One other thing, I think part of the reason why no further attempts were made to gain a little more hp was because of my stock clutch. I could remember the tuner making a few pulls, and as he was trying to switch gears the car would just rev up like if the car was in neutral. So maybe they just said F*** this I can work with this bad clutch
Im going to get an upgrade clutch, and have it retuned and see what it does then.
#7
Former Sponsor
Yeah I've heard that alot about being a "heart breaker", but for some reason I thought Ive seen cars do close to what Im doing with less mods. But, hey now Im comfortable hearing someone say that its right on the spot.
Thanks for your response
But, just so I could feel good im going to get a few pulls on a DynoJet
One other thing, I think part of the reason why no further attempts were made to gain a little more hp was because of my stock clutch. I could remember the tuner making a few pulls, and as he was trying to switch gears the car would just rev up like if the car was in neutral. So maybe they just said F*** this I can work with this bad clutch
Im going to get an upgrade clutch, and have it retuned and see what it does then.
Thanks for your response
But, just so I could feel good im going to get a few pulls on a DynoJet
One other thing, I think part of the reason why no further attempts were made to gain a little more hp was because of my stock clutch. I could remember the tuner making a few pulls, and as he was trying to switch gears the car would just rev up like if the car was in neutral. So maybe they just said F*** this I can work with this bad clutch
Im going to get an upgrade clutch, and have it retuned and see what it does then.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SwissMTNAlien
Evo X Dyno Results
48
Nov 7, 2012 11:08 AM
Drifting Away
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
31
Apr 1, 2012 05:39 PM