ETS can do it all Turbo Quad
#109
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,400
Likes: 75
From: Northwest
General tech-
3071 and stock cam on stock displacement got us 141whp. The cam in there we are currently renaming the S2, the S3 is going to go in and make some more. On this bike back to back the S2 was worth 15whp over stock on a 14B Mitsu turbo. Going back to a 3071 might be interesting since 121-122whp on the 734 with the stock cam grew to 136+ with the S2. The 54mm TB, ported head, and new cam are going to get tested before we go back up turbo size though.
aaron
#111
What is limiting you on a given turbo in this setup? 130HP is NOTHING for a gt2860.
Seems like you could drop down to like a GT1548 and have no trouble making that power but with better response and a fatter torque curve?
Or is better response not really desirable on something like this and you want a boost curve that linearly builds with RPM?
Seems like you could drop down to like a GT1548 and have no trouble making that power but with better response and a fatter torque curve?
Or is better response not really desirable on something like this and you want a boost curve that linearly builds with RPM?
#112
When you're cramming air from a turbo into a single cylinder compared to 4 cylinders, the boost pressure rises a lot faster with less airflow since the air compresses faster due to less space to occupy. So if you put a smaller turbo on it, it would do the same thing and make less power.
#113
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,400
Likes: 75
From: Northwest
What is limiting you on a given turbo in this setup? 130HP is NOTHING for a gt2860.
Seems like you could drop down to like a GT1548 and have no trouble making that power but with better response and a fatter torque curve?
Or is better response not really desirable on something like this and you want a boost curve that linearly builds with RPM?
Seems like you could drop down to like a GT1548 and have no trouble making that power but with better response and a fatter torque curve?
Or is better response not really desirable on something like this and you want a boost curve that linearly builds with RPM?
Now its bigger motors and cams that work with the smallest turbo that gives us what we want powerwise and also powerband/response.
#119
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,400
Likes: 75
From: Northwest
Thanks dude
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wmx-A...eature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzAWf...eature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wmx-A...eature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzAWf...eature=related
Last edited by JohnBradley; May 28, 2011 at 08:32 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lucas English
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
63
Dec 10, 2009 10:09 AM