Lancer Evolution IX, SE, 9.5 Editions: Photos, News, Reviews, etc...[MERGED]
#2658
Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago,IL/ Kyoto, Japan
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Samdiver74 I dont know of anyone running a RS as a base model saying it is better in Japan. Like I said before the RS 5 speed is marketed as a cheap version of the EVO.
#2659
Evolved Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AWDriven
Well I drove an EVO IX at the track today. It was part of the press release for the new Mitsu Truck. Which Sucks!
They also had EVO IX's for the journos to drive on track as well as an autoX area. As one of three driving instructors for the track portion I pretty much had free reign to drive the cars as much as I wanted. We had all 3 EVOs. MR, RS and the GSR (?). So heres my take.
First off I've never driven an VIII, so I have nothing but an STi to compare it to.
I do join the masses that say "buy a EVO if your going to track it quite a bit, buy an STi if its your daily driver". Comparing stock for stock, the EVO is better handling than the STi. Turn in is more precise, understeer, while still present is vastly reduced. Brakes are pretty much the same, but there seems to be a bit more pedal travel than in the STi. Keep in mind I was driving a pre-production unit with original fluid. So I would take that with a grain of salt. The tires I like better than the Bridgestones, they didn't get nearly as greasy under the same conditions. But then again they were new this AM. I don't remember what mine were like when new. IMO the STi has better power delivery. More torque down low, the EVO you need to rev to get the power out. But once it spools, it puts out till redline.
Driving the GSR and MR were pretty much the same on track, with the MR a tad softer. Hopping into the RS was altogether different. First off it felt like there was 25hp more. The lighter weight was very noticable. Much more nimble. I swear it feels like more than 120lbs less. Crisper turn-in, better braking, harder acceleration out of the corners. I was suprised at how different it was. But it was pretty stiff driving around the paddock. I don't think I'd want it on the street every day.
Interior was better than expected. The drivers seats don't get much better. I want them in my STi. Leather bolsters with suede seating. The rears are the same. No more of that crappy cloth. I do like the dash and center console on the STi better. The RS now has A/C standard.
While it may sound like I favor the EVO over the STi, thats not the case. Kind of. IMO they're even. It all comes down to how your gonna use it. Would I get an EVO? Yes, but right now the STi is the better choice for me. Maybe when the EVO X comes out that'll change.
To add to the rear wing discussions, Mitsu now has a downforce package that adds a wickerbill to the rear spoiler and a front airdam to the front. The wickerbill was only about 3/8" tall. The cars we had didn't get the front airdam, but had the wickerbill. It caused enough downforce (or anti-lift) in the back that the cars had a big push at speed. The wickerbill was removed and the push went away. Go figure.
They also had EVO IX's for the journos to drive on track as well as an autoX area. As one of three driving instructors for the track portion I pretty much had free reign to drive the cars as much as I wanted. We had all 3 EVOs. MR, RS and the GSR (?). So heres my take.
First off I've never driven an VIII, so I have nothing but an STi to compare it to.
I do join the masses that say "buy a EVO if your going to track it quite a bit, buy an STi if its your daily driver". Comparing stock for stock, the EVO is better handling than the STi. Turn in is more precise, understeer, while still present is vastly reduced. Brakes are pretty much the same, but there seems to be a bit more pedal travel than in the STi. Keep in mind I was driving a pre-production unit with original fluid. So I would take that with a grain of salt. The tires I like better than the Bridgestones, they didn't get nearly as greasy under the same conditions. But then again they were new this AM. I don't remember what mine were like when new. IMO the STi has better power delivery. More torque down low, the EVO you need to rev to get the power out. But once it spools, it puts out till redline.
Driving the GSR and MR were pretty much the same on track, with the MR a tad softer. Hopping into the RS was altogether different. First off it felt like there was 25hp more. The lighter weight was very noticable. Much more nimble. I swear it feels like more than 120lbs less. Crisper turn-in, better braking, harder acceleration out of the corners. I was suprised at how different it was. But it was pretty stiff driving around the paddock. I don't think I'd want it on the street every day.
Interior was better than expected. The drivers seats don't get much better. I want them in my STi. Leather bolsters with suede seating. The rears are the same. No more of that crappy cloth. I do like the dash and center console on the STi better. The RS now has A/C standard.
While it may sound like I favor the EVO over the STi, thats not the case. Kind of. IMO they're even. It all comes down to how your gonna use it. Would I get an EVO? Yes, but right now the STi is the better choice for me. Maybe when the EVO X comes out that'll change.
To add to the rear wing discussions, Mitsu now has a downforce package that adds a wickerbill to the rear spoiler and a front airdam to the front. The wickerbill was only about 3/8" tall. The cars we had didn't get the front airdam, but had the wickerbill. It caused enough downforce (or anti-lift) in the back that the cars had a big push at speed. The wickerbill was removed and the push went away. Go figure.
#2660
Evolving Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tampa FL
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rear Spoiler
While we are on the subject of the IX rear spoiler, I found out today that only the Horizontal section is Carbon Fibre, and it is hollow at that.
Apparently the Side supports are now ABS as apposed to the whole spoiler being Carbon like on the VIII.
Just a little new info
oh and the IX is going to use longer spark plugs, to help keep temperatures down around the plug area on the head.
Apparently the Side supports are now ABS as apposed to the whole spoiler being Carbon like on the VIII.
Just a little new info
oh and the IX is going to use longer spark plugs, to help keep temperatures down around the plug area on the head.
#2663
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Evo IX dyno run
See thread for dynochart and short video
http://www.socalevo.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=11839
http://www.socalevo.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=11839
Last edited by skiracer; Aug 21, 2005 at 09:54 PM.
#2666
lancer evos in general?
hey with the evo 8 did the mr come with sun roof? what is the differences between the models? i will be buying a evo 9 mr but was hoping i can get a sunroof on it too but i noticed the roof is lightened up so it wont be able to support a sunroof/moonroof.
#2668
Originally Posted by burningmoney97
those are some good numbers
correct me if i am wrong , but doesnt a stock 05 evo 8 dyno around 230hp / 235t
correct me if i am wrong , but doesnt a stock 05 evo 8 dyno around 230hp / 235t
It depends. I saw a couple evo's get dyno'd up in WA with about 240whp. Colder climates = denser air = more horses...
Heh, I should see what one pulls down up here in AK close to winter time.