Open deck? No worries!!!
#1
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: tsukuba turn 4
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Open deck? No worries!!!
for those of you who keep nagging about how great the 4G63 was and how much of a POS the 4B11 is you might wanna read this.
http://www.year2032.com/ecotec.htm
yep, that's right. that POS ecotec with open deck block took 750 hp on stock block with stock sleeves. kinda makes you wanna get a solstice GXP no? direct injected turbo? crap, i thought domestics were supposed to suck?
so now that that's settled what other "myths" does the 4B11 have to debunk in order to get some lovin?
http://www.year2032.com/ecotec.htm
yep, that's right. that POS ecotec with open deck block took 750 hp on stock block with stock sleeves. kinda makes you wanna get a solstice GXP no? direct injected turbo? crap, i thought domestics were supposed to suck?
so now that that's settled what other "myths" does the 4B11 have to debunk in order to get some lovin?
#3
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
I don't think the ecotek can de-bunk any of the concerns surrounding the 4b11. All that shows is that significantly more investment is needed in an ecotech to run 800 crank hp than is needed in a 4g63.
An open deck design won't be a problem for anyone who was planning to rebuild their motor in the first place, it's only a concern for the daily driver guy trying to wring as much as he can out of the stock parts. Afterall, a yugo motor can be built to take 1000hp if you have the money and dementia.
An open deck design won't be a problem for anyone who was planning to rebuild their motor in the first place, it's only a concern for the daily driver guy trying to wring as much as he can out of the stock parts. Afterall, a yugo motor can be built to take 1000hp if you have the money and dementia.
#4
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: tsukuba turn 4
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah, but they also tried the solid deck and that did nothing to stop the gasket from blowing. while open deck blocks do have a higher tendency to blow gaskets with high boost, i don't think it was the problem here. even with the o-rings, the cylinders still could have flexed or cracked but they didn't. not until about 750 hp. 5 years later do you think mitsu is gonna make a WORSE engine than the hugely underrated ecotec?
bottomline is that the stock 4B11 should be way more tunable than people think. all this talk about weak open deck aluminium engine blocks is based only on theoretic and NOT on empiric thinking.
bottomline is that the stock 4B11 should be way more tunable than people think. all this talk about weak open deck aluminium engine blocks is based only on theoretic and NOT on empiric thinking.
#5
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: tsukuba turn 4
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think the ecotek can de-bunk any of the concerns surrounding the 4b11. All that shows is that significantly more investment is needed in an ecotech to run 800 crank hp than is needed in a 4g63.
An open deck design won't be a problem for anyone who was planning to rebuild their motor in the first place, it's only a concern for the daily driver guy trying to wring as much as he can out of the stock parts. Afterall, a yugo motor can be built to take 1000hp if you have the money and dementia.
An open deck design won't be a problem for anyone who was planning to rebuild their motor in the first place, it's only a concern for the daily driver guy trying to wring as much as he can out of the stock parts. Afterall, a yugo motor can be built to take 1000hp if you have the money and dementia.
so worry about the bottom end before you worry about the block. and with mitsu's track record of bulletproof bottom ends, why are we worrying again?
#6
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
I wasn't worrying, i'm simply saying that you cannot compare the block design that GM put into their ecotek to a new "world engine" design that mitsu is using. If there is one thing GM does extremely well is engineer very stout aluminum engine blocks, and have been doing so for years. I'm not sure the same can be said for hyundai, chrysler, or mitsu.
But you cannot compare what one company does to how reliable the 4b11 will be. That'd be like comparing the ecotek's head now to a k-series (or even b-series) honda head. It is possible that the 4b11 will be very stout, but its possible that it'll be ej25 weak as well.
And that article says switching to a sleeved block didn't solve the problem experienced when approaching 600hp - because that problem was lifting heads which is somewhat common due to Al block's tendency to expand and bolts not holding as much clamping force. Obviously a closed deck won't fix this problem. However, the article did go on to say that the block will be sleeved for the 1000hp attempts.
I think the majority of the 4b11 "problems" will be solved within the first 2.5 years, but there will be a learning curve, and I don't expect an open block design to be as tough as a closed deck iron setup. But that doesn't mean it won't hold 400whp box stock.
But you cannot compare what one company does to how reliable the 4b11 will be. That'd be like comparing the ecotek's head now to a k-series (or even b-series) honda head. It is possible that the 4b11 will be very stout, but its possible that it'll be ej25 weak as well.
And that article says switching to a sleeved block didn't solve the problem experienced when approaching 600hp - because that problem was lifting heads which is somewhat common due to Al block's tendency to expand and bolts not holding as much clamping force. Obviously a closed deck won't fix this problem. However, the article did go on to say that the block will be sleeved for the 1000hp attempts.
I think the majority of the 4b11 "problems" will be solved within the first 2.5 years, but there will be a learning curve, and I don't expect an open block design to be as tough as a closed deck iron setup. But that doesn't mean it won't hold 400whp box stock.
#7
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: tsukuba turn 4
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wasn't worrying, i'm simply saying that you cannot compare the block design that GM put into their ecotek to a new "world engine" design that mitsu is using. If there is one thing GM does extremely well is engineer very stout aluminum engine blocks, and have been doing so for years. I'm not sure the same can be said for hyundai, chrysler, or mitsu.
But you cannot compare what one company does to how reliable the 4b11 will be. That'd be like comparing the ecotek's head now to a k-series (or even b-series) honda head. It is possible that the 4b11 will be very stout, but its possible that it'll be ej25 weak as well.
And that article says switching to a sleeved block didn't solve the problem experienced when approaching 600hp - because that problem was lifting heads which is somewhat common due to Al block's tendency to expand and bolts not holding as much clamping force. Obviously a closed deck won't fix this problem. However, the article did go on to say that the block will be sleeved for the 1000hp attempts.
I think the majority of the 4b11 "problems" will be solved within the first 2.5 years, but there will be a learning curve, and I don't expect an open block design to be as tough as a closed deck iron setup. But that doesn't mean it won't hold 400whp box stock.
But you cannot compare what one company does to how reliable the 4b11 will be. That'd be like comparing the ecotek's head now to a k-series (or even b-series) honda head. It is possible that the 4b11 will be very stout, but its possible that it'll be ej25 weak as well.
And that article says switching to a sleeved block didn't solve the problem experienced when approaching 600hp - because that problem was lifting heads which is somewhat common due to Al block's tendency to expand and bolts not holding as much clamping force. Obviously a closed deck won't fix this problem. However, the article did go on to say that the block will be sleeved for the 1000hp attempts.
I think the majority of the 4b11 "problems" will be solved within the first 2.5 years, but there will be a learning curve, and I don't expect an open block design to be as tough as a closed deck iron setup. But that doesn't mean it won't hold 400whp box stock.
call it blind faith but i doubt mitsu would put just any engine in the evo...
Trending Topics
#8
people forget that we move forward not backwards technology wise. If it is built right it will take tons of abuse. Even top fuel cars use aluminum block and have like 8,000hp. Of course the evo doesn't even come close but with such high advancement in technology anything is possible
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SKY888
Project Cars / Build Threads
158
May 8, 2018 01:44 PM
INJEN///
Lancer Aftermarket Forced Induction Tech
1
Sep 24, 2010 12:23 AM