Notices
Future Lancer / Evo Models Discuss any rumors and/or news concerning future Lancer and Evolution models in here.

evo XI?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 2, 2008, 08:12 PM
  #76  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (13)
 
EclipseMblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just as im kinda jealous of ppl rolling around in the new X while i still have a 8 by the time i get the 12 (if they ever make one) the people in the X shall envy me than ! lol
Old Jun 3, 2008, 12:32 PM
  #77  
Evolving Member
 
detroitmuscle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Motor City
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by felickz
my vote is for 380 ft-lb torque electric motors in each wheel. MIEV EVO!
that one electric in wheel motor mini cooper is insane.....it can do 0-60 in 4 seconds in REVERSE
Old Jun 3, 2008, 12:33 PM
  #78  
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
bigpzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sac
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they should ignore wrc rules and go 2.5 or 3.0...
Old Jun 8, 2008, 09:18 PM
  #79  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Solo II Evo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Central CT
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by bigpzz
they should ignore wrc rules and go 2.5 or 3.0...
And be failsauce like the WRX..
Old Jun 8, 2008, 10:10 PM
  #80  
Newbie
 
Fergy33WF's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EclipseMblue
just as im kinda jealous of ppl rolling around in the new X while i still have a 8 by the time i get the 12 (if they ever make one) the people in the X shall envy me than ! lol
Don't forget about the guys (like me!) rolling in the Lancer GTS's! haha... I'd kill for an evo! Maybe when I get through this college stuff there will be a nice X waiting for me! Of course by that time it will be the "old" evo. haha
Old Jun 22, 2008, 01:18 PM
  #81  
Newbie
 
makeithandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dsycks
cost. it takes a lot of cash to develop a new motor
i think they have plenty of that
Old Jun 23, 2008, 09:21 AM
  #82  
Newbie
 
zeckgx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FYI a manufacture to develop a new motor with out cost sharing is roughly 50,000,000. USD thas the last number I had confirmed.
Old Jun 25, 2008, 06:48 PM
  #83  
Newbie
iTrader: (-1)
 
Gatechraven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't necessarily think that the 2.0 wrc rules have much do with the reasoning. I mean I don't think mitsu is trying to run wrc anytime soon...
Old Jun 25, 2008, 07:22 PM
  #84  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CaliMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Left of you
Posts: 929
Received 27 Likes on 17 Posts
http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/fe...ory/index.html

Look at Evo VII. Homologation is dead.

Homologation has nothing to do with the 2 ltr motor. It is a marketing thing, to make people think it is still a "rally car" you can buy. Conveniently they have access to a modern 2 ltr motor, the 4b11.

EDIT: not talking smack about X, it pertains just as much to my beloved IX. In fact, I been trying to convince my friend to trade in his SRT4 on an X so that I can try driving one
Old Jun 26, 2008, 06:15 AM
  #85  
Newbie
 
zeckgx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
True homologation has issues but, rally is what made mitsubishi, and currently the top Grp. N cars are all evo's so there is still a reason to fallow fia rules and once the top level wrc cars go to either a modifies s2000 class or a modified Grp.N class then the 2.0L will reign supreme. I'd personally like to see the car go back to a 100IN wheel base and lose 500lbs. I don't need cruse or 12 airbags I am stripping them out any way. so there should be a gsr with all of the luxury and the MR with manual everything, no A/C no stupid 12 speaker stereo w/sub, and less sound dampening.
Old Jun 26, 2008, 11:24 AM
  #86  
Newbie
 
morgan320i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2.5l on sti doing 310 hp is more cost efective harder to get the hp out of a 2l and why would you want a motor that isnt tested like say evo and the rally car or i am sure the new x will be same engine . sti dosnt use the same engine as the rally team would
Old Aug 25, 2008, 07:22 AM
  #87  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
92gsxbaltimore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ?
Posts: 633
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let me premise this by saying that my sources cannot be reveled.

I got word from a corporate source that the 2009 Evo will be the last year for Evo brand. They will offer a special ralliart edition for 2010 (which will essentially be a 2010 Evo badged as a lancer ralliart special edition), but it will only be available with the dual clutch auto, no manual. I asked if sales were the cause, and the response I got was, "Bingo, we are trying to save a sinking ship". So, to all you guys who want a manual Evo, get yours in 09 or you'll be buying used.
Old Aug 25, 2008, 07:30 AM
  #88  
Evolving Member
 
P_ham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^You better be lieing, or I will punch a baby.^
Old Aug 25, 2008, 07:57 AM
  #89  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
92gsxbaltimore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ?
Posts: 633
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
all i can say is google Lancer Evolution and Raider future
Old Aug 25, 2008, 11:25 AM
  #90  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
92gsxbaltimore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ?
Posts: 633
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Proof *****es!!
2nd paragraph
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubi...ncer_Evolution


Quick Reply: evo XI?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:45 AM.