Notices
Future Lancer / Evo Models Discuss any rumors and/or news concerning future Lancer and Evolution models in here.

Not good news on mitsu future

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 6, 2009, 07:37 PM
  #106  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
S6devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
everyone, stop concentrating on the Chevy so much! the RA lost to 6 other cars as well, in 2 separate magazines!!!!!
S6devil is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2009, 08:23 PM
  #107  
GNR
Evolving Member
 
GNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RA lost because it had AWD, dual clutch tranny( others didnt come with auto, try testing the other cars with auto), and also RA was the heaviest one there I bet.. I wanna to see who will come out on top doing top speed runs on straight, then first turn lose control and do an 360, double flip and see which car the driver lives.. Thats why the ralliart was built to survive...
GNR is offline  
Old Feb 7, 2009, 09:49 AM
  #108  
Evolved Member
 
GPTourer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 4,312
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by S6devil
everyone, stop concentrating on the Chevy so much! the RA lost to 6 other cars as well, in 2 separate magazines!!!!!


You just don't get it. If you actually read the comparisons instead of only looking at the finishing order you wouldn't have said things like:

"between walking and taking the city bus."
"now 2 magazines hate the RA"

Which is just flat out wrong.
GPTourer is offline  
Old Feb 7, 2009, 11:01 AM
  #109  
Newbie
 
HondaHunter78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those magazines always hate on mitsu. Mitsu is always the underestimated underdog.
HondaHunter78 is offline  
Old Feb 7, 2009, 11:13 AM
  #110  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
S6devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes i do read, every word my friend.

fine, u r right, they dont hate it. not at all. they just consistently rate it 7th or 8th...
S6devil is offline  
Old Feb 7, 2009, 11:20 AM
  #111  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
S6devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HondaHunter78
Those magazines always hate on mitsu. Mitsu is always the underestimated underdog.
not true!!
most mags loved the Evo VIII and IX. for years mags claimed the Evo was a better performing and more enjoyable car than the Sti.
The Evo was the segment leader, till the X showed its fat, slow and expensive snout
S6devil is offline  
Old Feb 7, 2009, 11:38 AM
  #112  
Evolved Member
 
GPTourer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 4,312
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by S6devil
not true!!
most mags loved the Evo VIII and IX. for years mags claimed the Evo was a better performing and more enjoyable car than the Sti.
The Evo was the segment leader, till the X showed its fat, slow and expensive snout
I haven't seen much bad press about the X either. The consensus I've gotten is that it is a little slower in straight line speed, but it is a better handler. It won this comparo:

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...omparison_test

So it is still the segment leader. It is more often compared to itself or former self, actually then other cars.

http://www.motortrend.com/av/roadtes...son/index.html

So again, I really don't see how you can draw these conclusions after actually reading these articles. Please share the ones that show the X to be dethroned from segment leader because its slow, fat and expensive.
GPTourer is offline  
Old Feb 7, 2009, 12:17 PM
  #113  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
S6devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no matter how many articles i show, its still an Evo forum. what else could i possibly expect to hear on it, other than mitsubishi is great, all else is bad.

i just referred u to 2 separate tests, being conducted 3 months apart, by 2 individual magazines, both placing the RA dead last, or next to last. and still people dismissed the results, and claimed magazine bias and favoritism. so why would i waste a minute more looking for an article about the X ??? no matter what, u, and others will still deny it, or find an excuse.
bad tires, heavy driver, bad weather, bad mood....
S6devil is offline  
Old Feb 7, 2009, 06:30 PM
  #114  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
dboz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ohio
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GPTourer
I haven't seen much bad press about the X either.
The Autoweek Long Term update stated that the MR SST enthusiasm was starting to wane and that it was concerning how the trans would shift mid turn and jolt the car. They also said potholes were still very jarring and was getting old.
dboz is offline  
Old Feb 7, 2009, 08:18 PM
  #115  
GNR
Evolving Member
 
GNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Must be the stiff suspension, ask them to live with an lamberghin gallado?
GNR is offline  
Old Feb 7, 2009, 10:00 PM
  #116  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Excalibur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Abiline/Converse, TX
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by S6devil
not true!!
most mags loved the Evo VIII and IX. for years mags claimed the Evo was a better performing and more enjoyable car than the Sti.
The Evo was the segment leader, till the X showed its fat, slow and expensive snout
My dealer is selling x's with the lip kit for 32k. The gsr 03 I had was 33k. It's not really that expensive imo. Unless they're marking them up in other places or something. They are heavier though.
Excalibur is offline  
Old Feb 7, 2009, 10:10 PM
  #117  
Cyp
Evolving Member
 
Cyp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: N. California
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by S6devil
no matter how many articles i show, its still an Evo forum. what else could i possibly expect to hear on it, other than mitsubishi is great, all else is bad.

i just referred u to 2 separate tests, being conducted 3 months apart, by 2 individual magazines, both placing the RA dead last, or next to last. and still people dismissed the results, and claimed magazine bias and favoritism. so why would i waste a minute more looking for an article about the X ??? no matter what, u, and others will still deny it, or find an excuse.
bad tires, heavy driver, bad weather, bad mood....
You are sooo right! good job buddy. Glad your bringing all of this to our attention. Well, looks like you will find yourself more at home at a lexus or mercedes Forum.
Cyp is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2009, 08:17 AM
  #118  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
S6devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ well for one, the average age is certainly higher there
S6devil is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2009, 08:27 AM
  #119  
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (2)
 
sblvro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: chicago, michigan, arkansas
Posts: 3,135
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I agree with s6 on this one. the ralliart is suppose to showcase the mitsu racing heritage since previous evo's were made by the ralliart division of mitsu in japan. But the ralliart has no bite at all and deadlast in all the comparo test. I was surprised that C/D picked the evo to win the Sti battle time and time again but it is because they liked the evo so much
sblvro is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2009, 08:51 AM
  #120  
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (19)
 
migs647's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Portland
Posts: 5,043
Received 62 Likes on 59 Posts
IMO, the ralliart was a huge failure. Mainly because of price, second because you're forced to use the SST. The SST is great for some people (heavy traffic, don't know how to use a stick)... but it didn't perform the way we thought it would on paper. Has sluggish shifts randomly, gets confused which gear to be in on certain RPMs, very costly to replace. With that being said, it's not just the SST that made the Ralliart a non competitor. I think the biggest thing has going against it this year is weight. You're supposed to LOSE weight not add it. Heavy cars only appeal to luxury people. If could really get their cars on a weight loss diet, they would be some major contenders. One thing is for sure, is advertising like crazy. Everywhere I go I see marketing. That WILL pay off in the end. I think if was really planning on closing their doors they would scale back marketing before closing. I think they will be around a while longer.
migs647 is offline  


Quick Reply: Not good news on mitsu future



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:06 PM.