Notices
Future Lancer / Evo Models Discuss any rumors and/or news concerning future Lancer and Evolution models in here.

Here's the MOTOR TREND article (56k beware)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 2, 2004, 11:47 AM
  #31  
e8
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
e8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: at the track
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
THANK YOU!!! great post.


anyone know what the '03 Evos can lap the Streets of Willows in? that'd be great.
Old Sep 2, 2004, 11:48 AM
  #32  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Greg K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
thanks for the article, still going to buy the mag when I can find it, but I liked the "preview".
Old Sep 2, 2004, 11:48 AM
  #33  
Evolved Member
 
GPTourer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 4,312
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Don't worry, even though I read it, I'll buy the magazine anyway.

Someone will find a way to remove whatever resistor on the ECU to get full RPM launches. 6000 dumps can't be good for an STi either.
Old Sep 2, 2004, 11:49 AM
  #34  
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (106)
 
mitsuorder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,816
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I will too, anything for ramen
Old Sep 2, 2004, 11:54 AM
  #35  
Evolved Member
 
s4awd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by EVO Neil
It's not just the MR that gets the 5,000 rpm launch limit, it is all versions of the Evo, world-wide.
How would you compare the new '05 Evo with the active diff to the 03 Evo that has the mechanical one.?
Old Sep 2, 2004, 11:54 AM
  #36  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
EVO Neil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DizzyTT
Evo Neil, I am going to buy it, so you can have your ramen noodles for dinner!
Thanks, much appreciated. We worked hard on getting these cars before anyone else and doing the most comprehensive testing we could do.
Old Sep 2, 2004, 11:56 AM
  #37  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
modvp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Maryland
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EVO Neil
Thanks, much appreciated. We worked hard on getting these cars before anyone else and doing the most comprehensive testing we could do.
I'll be buying it too!
Old Sep 2, 2004, 12:00 PM
  #38  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
EVO Neil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by e8
THANK YOU!!! great post.


anyone know what the '03 Evos can lap the Streets of Willows in? that'd be great.
We had an '03 stock Evo there the day of testing at Willow and if I remember correctly, it was 2 seconds a lap slower than the MR.
Old Sep 2, 2004, 12:03 PM
  #39  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
EVO Neil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by s4awd
How would you compare the new '05 Evo with the active diff to the 03 Evo that has the mechanical one.?
Like the STi, it gives the driver more control, but do you really need it? All of our testing was in tarmac mode, although at the press preview our driver did use gravel mode on a wet track and noticed it was better than tarmac mode for those conditions.

Last edited by EVO Neil; Sep 18, 2004 at 12:20 PM.
Old Sep 2, 2004, 12:03 PM
  #40  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
modvp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Maryland
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow 2 seconds is quite significant!
Old Sep 2, 2004, 12:09 PM
  #41  
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (106)
 
mitsuorder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,816
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Agreed, but, and please no future mr owners take offense to this, when something goes wrong with that acd system I don't want to be within 5 miles of that bill. Awesome numbers from some cars that we are very fortunate to even have.
Old Sep 2, 2004, 12:10 PM
  #42  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Ookami's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CO
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Curb weight of the MR is 3273 ?? Isn't the regular Evo 8 (not RS) w/o sunroof only 3263 (according to Mitsubishi's website) Hmm...
Old Sep 2, 2004, 12:13 PM
  #43  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
EVO Neil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ookami
Curb weight of the MR is 3273 ?? Isn't the regular Evo 8 (not RS) w/o sunroof only 3263 (according to Mitsubishi's website) Hmm...
Every vehicle we test is weighed at our office, on our scales, with a full tank of fuel sans driver.

Last edited by EVO Neil; Sep 2, 2004 at 01:39 PM.
Old Sep 2, 2004, 12:28 PM
  #44  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
legal-z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Deland, FL
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
after reading this, i'm hoping someone like vishnu gets to work programming out that clutch-in limiter. i think the acceleration numbers would be quite different without it and the difference between the two cars would be more apparant.

thanks for posting this and thanks to evo neil for continuing to follow up with the useful info not in the article, especially the 2 sec lap difference between the mr and '03.

Last edited by legal-z; Sep 2, 2004 at 12:32 PM.
Old Sep 2, 2004, 12:43 PM
  #45  
Newbie
 
patio furniture's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: new jersey
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im still prolly gettin the STi nigguhs


Quick Reply: Here's the MOTOR TREND article (56k beware)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:13 PM.