Notices
Future Lancer / Evo Models Discuss any rumors and/or news concerning future Lancer and Evolution models in here.

Why Im Getting An MR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 20, 2004, 10:39 AM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
STI KLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SYLMAR,CA
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face Why Im Getting An MR

Sorry guys no more evo for me

Last edited by STI KLR; Sep 26, 2004 at 08:17 PM.
Old Sep 20, 2004, 01:31 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
DaWorstPlaya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,216
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Hopefully you'll be driving an STi ... LOL! (joke) then your nic would be perfect
Old Sep 20, 2004, 01:34 PM
  #3  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
johnnysixer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 991
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post pics when you get it.
Old Sep 20, 2004, 01:56 PM
  #4  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
STI KLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SYLMAR,CA
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sure ill post some pictures, Anyone know where can i get those pink stickers that the MR had in SoCal Evo?
Old Sep 20, 2004, 01:58 PM
  #5  
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
-130 R-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by STI KLR
Sure ill post some pictures, Anyone know where can i get those pink stickers that the MR had in SoCal Evo?
We got those stickers from Mitsu corporate at that meet. You could PM Coolguy949 and see if he has any left...
Old Sep 20, 2004, 02:00 PM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
dizzigital's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 1,697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SC~ To advertise on these forums you must first have a Vendor account.

Last edited by Secret Chimp; Sep 21, 2004 at 08:33 AM.
Old Sep 20, 2004, 06:59 PM
  #7  
Evolving Member
 
chantaiman51's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Monterey Park
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Originally Posted by STI KLR
My baby dynoaed at 433 RWHP, with x pipe no cats, super chip and 3 inch pulley, flowmaster 1 chaimber catback, t56 pro 5.0 shifter. k&n cold air.
The MR is going to have better handling and 60 foot but im going to miss beating bikes, Now its EVO all the way. Hopefully i get that Evo to make more power and be faster than my old baby, my goal is to runs high 11's constant in the 1/4 and still have handling, I like an all around car, I've only made it to mid 12's constant and low 12's stripped down.
What kind of bikes were you trying to beat with 433RWHP? And what kind of idiot motorcyclists drag race, especially with cage?
Current 600cc motorcycle runs high 10's and low 11's. 1000cc class runs high 9's and low 10's. Bikes have HP to weight ratio of 1:3. In order for car to beat bikes, your "car" needs closer to 1100 RWHP.
Old Sep 20, 2004, 07:08 PM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
boostfed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: TN, near Nashville
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by chantaiman51
What kind of bikes were you trying to beat with 433RWHP? And what kind of idiot motorcyclists drag race, especially with cage?
Current 600cc motorcycle runs high 10's and low 11's. 1000cc class runs high 9's and low 10's. Bikes have HP to weight ratio of 1:3. In order for car to beat bikes, your "car" needs closer to 1100 RWHP.
you forgot one major factor in that theory. Driving skill. from what I understand. the people that test those bikes to make those figures are usually skilled professional riders that have a lot of experience under there belt. There alot of ameature bike riders out there now-a-days.

so in a sense. the bike is faster but the operator must be capable of using the power. hence how a car can be faster.
numbers and figures look good on paper, but producing them is a whole new ball park.

-Chad-

Last edited by boostfed; Sep 20, 2004 at 07:13 PM.
Old Sep 20, 2004, 08:14 PM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
EVOTEXAS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by chantaiman51
What kind of bikes were you trying to beat with 433RWHP? And what kind of idiot motorcyclists drag race, especially with cage?
Current 600cc motorcycle runs high 10's and low 11's. 1000cc class runs high 9's and low 10's. Bikes have HP to weight ratio of 1:3. In order for car to beat bikes, your "car" needs closer to 1100 RWHP.
Hey man, I am sure he was talking about on the highway. In my EVO I have outrun some 600cc bikes and I only have 300 AWHP.

In my 01 Z28 I could outrun 600's and 750's with about 350 RWHP.

A bike's power to weight ratio doesn't mean a whole lot on the highway. I doubt he was pulling any liter bikes.
Old Sep 20, 2004, 08:31 PM
  #10  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Derek Baker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Everyone just remember bikes will run that in the quarter mile. But remember its hard to keep the front wheel down under hard accereration like that . Thats why most of us can beat them with hp numbers in the 400 hp range at the wheels .

Derek
Old Sep 20, 2004, 11:13 PM
  #11  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
STI KLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SYLMAR,CA
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never was able to beat the 1000, only a lot of 600 and some 750s
Old Sep 21, 2004, 01:18 AM
  #12  
Evolving Member
 
chantaiman51's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Monterey Park
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by boostfed
you forgot one major factor in that theory. Driving skill. from what I understand. the people that test those bikes to make those figures are usually skilled professional riders that have a lot of experience under there belt. There alot of ameature bike riders out there now-a-days.

so in a sense. the bike is faster but the operator must be capable of using the power. hence how a car can be faster.
numbers and figures look good on paper, but producing them is a whole new ball park.

-Chad-
This logic is so flawed. All you need is a semi competent rider. 600cc is atleast 1-2 seconds faster than a fast car. Even if the rider messed up big time on launch, he/she can catch up fast. Pro rider manage 11 secs on 600cc, and pro driver manage 13 seconds on car. Most rider cannot do 11 secs on bike, so does most driver can't do 13 seconds on car.

Launching a bike correctly is not that difficult, its about the same as launching a car if not easier. And the bike has huge advantage to start with.
Old Sep 21, 2004, 01:25 AM
  #13  
Evolving Member
 
chantaiman51's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Monterey Park
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EVOTEXAS
Hey man, I am sure he was talking about on the highway. In my EVO I have outrun some 600cc bikes and I only have 300 AWHP.

In my 01 Z28 I could outrun 600's and 750's with about 350 RWHP.

A bike's power to weight ratio doesn't mean a whole lot on the highway. I doubt he was pulling any liter bikes.
There is no possible way your Z28 can outrun a modern 600. What you beat is probably a 45 hp 450lb FZR600, or a Katana 750.

Last time, I was toying with a Modena with my duc 748. I easily beat it from 80 to 120mph. And my 748 is extremley slow comparing with my 998 and 1000RR.
Old Sep 21, 2004, 01:29 AM
  #14  
Evolving Member
 
evo sky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chantaiman51
This logic is so flawed. All you need is a semi competent rider. 600cc is atleast 1-2 seconds faster than a fast car. Even if the rider messed up big time on launch, he/she can catch up fast. Pro rider manage 11 secs on 600cc, and pro driver manage 13 seconds on car. Most rider cannot do 11 secs on bike, so does most driver can't do 13 seconds on car.

Launching a bike correctly is not that difficult, its about the same as launching a car if not easier. And the bike has huge advantage to start with.
u never defined what "fast car" is... and I dont know where this 13 seconds is coming from

But let's assume fast car means production vehicles
in that case the McLaren F1 can do the quartermile in 11.9's =)
Old Sep 21, 2004, 01:37 AM
  #15  
Evolving Member
 
chantaiman51's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Monterey Park
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Derek Baker
Everyone just remember bikes will run that in the quarter mile. But remember its hard to keep the front wheel down under hard accereration like that . Thats why most of us can beat them with hp numbers in the 400 hp range at the wheels .

Derek
Its very easy to keep the front wheel planted on the ground. First, lean as forward as you can on the tank. Second, extend your legs out toward the back. Third, slip the clutch while twisting the throttle. Another way is using your right foot to cover the rear brake, this way, there is no way the bike can flip over on you.

BTW, if you don't chop the throttle and whack it open all the way quickly while you are on first or second gear, its actually quite hard to power wheelie a 600 from the start. It actually takes some skill to wheelie a 600. You have to be really stupid to messed up the launch because 600 doesn't make much below 6k rpm.

But of course, whoever is stupid enough to drag race with a car probably don't know how to ride anyway, so i guess beating them is possible.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:52 AM.