cyberninja

iTrader: (1)

Finally got the safc2 tuned they way I want it. Just pulled a 1750 Hz @100% WOT and 7050rpm. running 93 octane. Here's a quick list of mods
3" tbe
intake
grounding kit
fuel pump
mbc @ 21 psi
custom base dyno flash
02 housing
cat delete
s-afc2
What do you guys think?

cyberninja

iTrader: (1)

bump.....and with minimum settings the car pulls really hard. Very noticable

Warrtalon

iTrader: (6)

Well, you already have a flash, so you should only have minimum settings to begin with. All we have to go on is your max Karman readings, but that doesn't indicate how good the tune is - just how much air you're flowing. I'd imagine that if you have your AFR and timing curves looking nice and linear at the proper values, then your car is probably running very well, but we'd need logs to tell you for sure.

For comparison, with the mods listed in my sig, I am seeing 1760hz or so at the top of 3rd. Before I turned my boost down, I was seeing 1810 at the top of 3rd and up to 1830 in 4th. I thought that boost level was ok, but when I dyno'd, I wasn't making smooth power due to the increased knock in this heat. After turning the boost down some, my karman readings suffered (obviously), but the car ran much more smoothly and without any pulled timing. I'll probably be able to turn the boost back up when the temps drop again, but for now, I'm good at 20-21 or so...

RazorLab

iTrader: (8)

Wartalon,

I think somebody beat you to the 11sec MR:

http://www.harmanmotive.com/index.ph...os=0,100000,17

Warrtalon

iTrader: (6)

Oops, well, I guess I'll wait until I see a timeslip. I'm not sure what "corrected" means at the end of the et/mph, but I'd be very interested in finding out how he hit 116mph when 4th gear ends at 110.7 (stock) and a bit over 112 at 8000rpm. The mph is consistent with the HP, but the ET is very low (great driving).

RazorLab

iTrader: (8)

It was probably run at the track in socal which is way above sea level so they do corrected time slips.

Yea, I wouldn't mind see a time slip too.

Warrtalon

iTrader: (6)

If that's the case, then it doesn't count anyway. The guys in Colorado at 5800ft and the in Arizona at 3100ft don't make corrected claims, although they do make sure to mention the altitude holding them back.

RazorLab

iTrader: (8)

Well it was just my theory, who knows, maybe email them and ask?

SR20DE-T

iTrader: (10)

Did the MR have cams in it when it ran 11's? I still think warrtalon can do it with a basically not touching the engine at all.

Warrtalon

iTrader: (6)

The car in question does have cams and several other things on the list that I don't have, but there is no timeslip, and the webpage just has an et/mph with the word (corrected) after it, so I'm not so sure it ran 11s for real...

G20

iTrader: (13)

He has AEM-EMS and also he can do flash (he's a vendor) to raise the rev limit up too. Most of people here in So Cal complained about the slow of the LACR track so I guess he maybe ran on that track. I wouldn't do any correction things on my times, I want to get the real number no matter where I am.