Please Clarify my Wideband Research (Innovate/Zeitronix)
#16
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Emailed Zetronix. Turns out they do not need a manual free air calibration:
I've never heard this mentioned on this forum...pretty important I'd say. I wonder why no Zeitronix fans or vendors haven't mentioned this when Innovate states they can perform "Free Air calibrations?"
I also asked when you would know the O2 sensor went in a Zeitronix setup and I received this reply:
So the advantage w/ the Innovate LC1 to compensate for O2 sensor wear is lost it seems. This leaves the two points left for me to figure out:
-ZT2 has a faster sample rate.
-LC1 has direct digital sampling.
Why can I get both in one wideband?
Does one advantage outweigh another?
The Zt-2 Wideband AFR Meter and Datalogging System has a self calibrating routine internally driving the O2 sensor 1000 times per second. There is no need for frequent manual calibration and O2 sensor removal from the exhaust pipe.
I also asked when you would know the O2 sensor went in a Zeitronix setup and I received this reply:
A dead O2 sensor typically gets stuck at 14.7 or 21 AFR. Sometimes at the end of life the sensor will slow down the response time. You will know.
-ZT2 has a faster sample rate.
-LC1 has direct digital sampling.
Why can I get both in one wideband?
![Frown](https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/images/smilies/frown.gif)
#17
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
If you plan to log your WBO2 signal via EvoScan or Mitsulogger, chances are that you'll never see that speed from the ZT-2. Logging all of the values I use, I usually get 10-15 samples/sec.
Last edited by TouringBubble; Jan 22, 2008 at 06:06 PM. Reason: incorrect info ... sorry
#22
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ventura County, CA
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just want to add the reason you see a lot of posts on the innovate forum about LC-1 going bad is because it is sensitive to power levels I think. So when you install it you want to make sure the wiring is connected well and that you have good grounds.
Regarding free-air calibration, it is very easy. Just requires pushing a button and a few seconds. And you don't need to remove the sensor from the exhaust if you can have your car sit for a day or more.
Regarding free-air calibration, it is very easy. Just requires pushing a button and a few seconds. And you don't need to remove the sensor from the exhaust if you can have your car sit for a day or more.
#23
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
... or if you have a decent sized hill around ... I calibrate my sensor with the car running after the injectors cut out on decel. The engine basically turns in to a big air pump and pushes the exhaust gases out rather quickly once the injectors cut out. It's a rather handy trick.
#25
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I ended up ordering the Innovate LC1 ans Tactrix cable this evening. I like looking stealth and after all the back and forth of technical speak, I think they are both good products, but I don't believe I'll be logging TPS and EGT, but just AFR and Boost through the JDM sensor/ECU. The LC1 was cheaper, so wish me luck on my tuning journey!!!
I plan on installing the Wideband on the stock downpipe, tuning my stock car as best I can as a learning process, then as I change bolt-ons....tune some more.
I appreciate everyone's help!!!
I plan on installing the Wideband on the stock downpipe, tuning my stock car as best I can as a learning process, then as I change bolt-ons....tune some more.
I appreciate everyone's help!!!
#27
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
I ended up ordering the Innovate LC1 ans Tactrix cable this evening. I like looking stealth and after all the back and forth of technical speak, I think they are both good products, but I don't believe I'll be logging TPS and EGT, but just AFR and Boost through the JDM sensor/ECU. The LC1 was cheaper, so wish me luck on my tuning journey!!!
I plan on installing the Wideband on the stock downpipe, tuning my stock car as best I can as a learning process, then as I change bolt-ons....tune some more.
I appreciate everyone's help!!!
I plan on installing the Wideband on the stock downpipe, tuning my stock car as best I can as a learning process, then as I change bolt-ons....tune some more.
I appreciate everyone's help!!!
#28
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hrmmm, I thought I was confident in my decision based off advice like yours:
"I really like both setups, but the ZT2 has great options for meth setups (failsafe)."
.....and others. Not a very helpful forum member to speak after I made the purchase, huh?
"I really like both setups, but the ZT2 has great options for meth setups (failsafe)."
.....and others. Not a very helpful forum member to speak after I made the purchase, huh?
#29
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
![Wink](https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Last edited by cij911; Jan 26, 2008 at 02:25 PM.
#30
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Im pretty sure they wanted to install it and learn the basics of tuning then start tossing parts at it. I would prefer the LC-1 but right now mine is throwing error codes left and right and either my lc-1 or sensor is dead, (and its brand new, 0 miles on it, never even seen any hot exhaust).
Last edited by Jameson_IXMR; Jan 27, 2008 at 01:11 AM.