RRM Turbo installed/completed
#286
Account Disabled
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nobody is hating just saying dont get your head in the clouds like you have a fast car thinking you can do this and that without doing proper research. all people are saying.. "hating" is if people were saying your car sucks throw it away you wasted your money on that POS which no one is saying..so you need to figure the definition of hating and constructive criticism
Last edited by LuDa; Apr 21, 2009 at 06:58 AM.
#287
Evolving Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
... He just said bring which ever car Evo GTS Si down for a "fun run" which I am taking it as he was hinting at racing Luda. And if he is boasting about walking a is350 that would mean he would be able to compete with evo's and that is BS. You guys are getting way to ahead of yourselves. Haterade??? why would I "hate on" serious? I am just calling BS on him taking out an IS350... My buddys rsx when he was supercharged struggled with IS350's and he was pushing 262whp/had LSD's/drag radials/and his car weighs 400+lbs less than yours at that time. As I said if you aren't on the strip than you can't compare your car. Once you post some numbers maybe than we can know for sure how fast you really are. Until than don't boast about taking on IS350's and other cars that are out of the lancers league.
Last edited by Mayhem7o2; Apr 21, 2009 at 10:36 AM.
#288
Evolved Member
How many times have you seen the phrase "should have just bought an evo"?? Too many times, is this constructive??
Whether you think so or not, I have seen nothing in these turbo threads but hating. "You car will never beat an SI, or an EVo, or a WRX, etc etc... "
If Serious claims he can take car A, B, or C the only person who can disprove this claim is car A, B, or C. So until they come around.... I can understand that Haterade is going to be the drink of choice here.
FYI... I understand hating as calling someone out on a claim with nothing to back it up other then speculation or numbers. "Oh, well this has 300+hp and your has 220 hp so yours will never win" This statement is useless
Last edited by EngRWW33; Apr 21, 2009 at 11:00 AM.
#289
Evolving Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How is this constructive criticism? I see nothing constructive about this statement. All I see is someone saying, "oh, your turboed but guess what you are still not fast."
How many times have you seen the phrase "should have just bought an evo"?? Too many times, is this constructive??
Whether you think so or not, I have seen nothing in these turbo threads but hating. "You car will never beat an SI, or an EVo, or a WRX, etc etc... "
If Serious claims he can take car A, B, or C the only person who can disprove this claim is car A, B, or C. So until they come around.... I can understand that Haterade is going to be the drink of choice here.
FYI... I understand hating as calling someone out on a claim with nothing to back it up other then speculation or numbers. "Oh, well this has 300+hp and your has 220 hp so yours will never win" This statement is useless
How many times have you seen the phrase "should have just bought an evo"?? Too many times, is this constructive??
Whether you think so or not, I have seen nothing in these turbo threads but hating. "You car will never beat an SI, or an EVo, or a WRX, etc etc... "
If Serious claims he can take car A, B, or C the only person who can disprove this claim is car A, B, or C. So until they come around.... I can understand that Haterade is going to be the drink of choice here.
FYI... I understand hating as calling someone out on a claim with nothing to back it up other then speculation or numbers. "Oh, well this has 300+hp and your has 220 hp so yours will never win" This statement is useless
Lancer-
220hp at 6000rpm
3120lbs
FWD w/o LSD's
5-speed
IS350
302hp at 6400rpm
3518lbs
RWD w/ LSD's
6-speed close ratio
1/4 time of 14.00
If my buddys rsx that weighs 400lbs less than serious08's lancer(800lbs less than the IS350) and pulls 40+hp struggled to pull on IS350's than serious raced a sh** driver. No one cares if you beat a crappy driver... That doesn't mean you beat that car. If you are tuning your car to compete with a certain model than your tuning your car for the wrong reason.
Last edited by Mayhem7o2; Apr 21, 2009 at 11:51 AM.
#290
Account Disabled
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How is this constructive criticism? I see nothing constructive about this statement. All I see is someone saying, "oh, your turboed but guess what you are still not fast."
How many times have you seen the phrase "should have just bought an evo"?? Too many times, is this constructive??
Whether you think so or not, I have seen nothing in these turbo threads but hating. "You car will never beat an SI, or an EVo, or a WRX, etc etc... "
If Serious claims he can take car A, B, or C the only person who can disprove this claim is car A, B, or C. So until they come around.... I can understand that Haterade is going to be the drink of choice here.
FYI... I understand hating as calling someone out on a claim with nothing to back it up other then speculation or numbers. "Oh, well this has 300+hp and your has 220 hp so yours will never win" This statement is useless
How many times have you seen the phrase "should have just bought an evo"?? Too many times, is this constructive??
Whether you think so or not, I have seen nothing in these turbo threads but hating. "You car will never beat an SI, or an EVo, or a WRX, etc etc... "
If Serious claims he can take car A, B, or C the only person who can disprove this claim is car A, B, or C. So until they come around.... I can understand that Haterade is going to be the drink of choice here.
FYI... I understand hating as calling someone out on a claim with nothing to back it up other then speculation or numbers. "Oh, well this has 300+hp and your has 220 hp so yours will never win" This statement is useless
so if we're all being REALISTIC technically with both being decent drivers you are not going to have a chance against an evo,Sti,or IS350 thats the way it is i dont see how pointing out the obvious is "hating" if he said yeah ill call out a turbo TC. ok great go for it..thats something i would be interested in seeing. but dont call out a car that puts 2x as much power than your car stock.
in other words its not a claim if you say he cant beat an evo..do you have to drag a Mustang v6 and a mustang GT to know that the GT is faster? no. would you have to drag a turbo fit vs an evo to know whats faster? no these things are obvious which people have been pointing out. i know some of you take pride in your cars and have big plans but the truth of the matter is..just like the previous generation lancers we will probably never seen more than a 300hp lancer. i have one myself so im not hating on the car..
#293
i dont think anyone here is hating just stating the facts i guess but if i were to turbo my lancer it wouldnt be to compete with evos, is350s or anything like that i would just get it to make my car faster and have around 215/235 or so whp which is reasonable i really dont care about the car being 300whp which isnt possible right now but i mean a 215/235 car would be a really good gain for these lancers i think because not alot of people have evos or is350s so that is the reason why i think the turbo is worth it because you should be able to compete with most cars in the street just not the 1/10 cars that have an evo lol but back to the topic good job on your turbo im sure you noticed a huge difference keep us posted and updated as you brake it in!
#294
Account Disabled
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i dont think anyone here is hating just stating the facts i guess but if i were to turbo my lancer it wouldnt be to compete with evos, is350s or anything like that i would just get it to make my car faster and have around 215/235 or so whp which is reasonable i really dont care about the car being 300whp which isnt possible right now but i mean a 215/235 car would be a really good gain for these lancers i think because not alot of people have evos or is350s so that is the reason why i think the turbo is worth it because you should be able to compete with most cars in the street just not the 1/10 cars that have an evo lol but back to the topic good job on your turbo im sure you noticed a huge difference keep us posted and updated as you brake it in!
#295
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ft Worth
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Honestly dude you aren't going to take any evo... And no the X's internals wont work. If you honestly think they will than buy the Works Stroker kit and up your boost.
You need to keep your head straight on your shoulders, all Luda is trying to do is inject a little realism into you. IS350's are out of your league, on paper and on pavement. You are shooting way to high for the actual capability of your car. And stop street racing... 20/40/60mph rolls are literally the worst way to compare your car to others. HONK, HONK, GO HONK!.... One car will always get the jump on the other. take it to a track and race it from 0mph and don't forget to heat the tires. With out a LSD a bolt-on Si will get the jump on you and from there it is a toss up.
for the last time people the X's internals won't work... If you honestly believe they will than try it. It's not my car you will be destroying.
You need to keep your head straight on your shoulders, all Luda is trying to do is inject a little realism into you. IS350's are out of your league, on paper and on pavement. You are shooting way to high for the actual capability of your car. And stop street racing... 20/40/60mph rolls are literally the worst way to compare your car to others. HONK, HONK, GO HONK!.... One car will always get the jump on the other. take it to a track and race it from 0mph and don't forget to heat the tires. With out a LSD a bolt-on Si will get the jump on you and from there it is a toss up.
for the last time people the X's internals won't work... If you honestly believe they will than try it. It's not my car you will be destroying.
Really, an IS350 is out of my league? Wonder why I beat one. It all depends on a driver. I have seen a car with 700 hp run 15s. I guess I should have stated that the driver of the IS350 was out of my league.
And what makes you think I am street racing. I never stated that. Maybe, just maybe my uncle owns a private airstrip for his plane and allows us local boys to come out and run.
Last edited by SeRious08; Apr 22, 2009 at 10:55 AM.
#296
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ft Worth
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, to a point. But we are dealing with a completely new engine and ECU. None of you know how the engine responds to a turbo. Look at the 1000 different kits for a Honda Civic. They all post different results and make the car respond differently. This kit may post 250 whp, it may post 175 whp. No one know right now. So how can you put down a kit and claim as proof of whats in my class??
#297
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ft Worth
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That statement is extremely ignorant to say. A 302hp and a 220hp car both driven by PROFESSIONAL drivers will always yeild the same results. 302hp IS350 will always take the 220hp Turbo Lancer on a walk. Serious nor the IS350 he claims he walked are professional drivers. They weren't even on the strip which makes this entire discussion pointless. I know for a fact he can not take a good driver in a is350.
Lancer-
220hp at 6000rpm
3120lbs
FWD w/o LSD's
5-speed
IS350
302hp at 6400rpm
3518lbs
RWD w/ LSD's
6-speed close ratio
1/4 time of 14.00
Lancer-
220hp at 6000rpm
3120lbs
FWD w/o LSD's
5-speed
IS350
302hp at 6400rpm
3518lbs
RWD w/ LSD's
6-speed close ratio
1/4 time of 14.00
Not only that, last I checked the 2006 IS350 posted 306 hp.
So that 306 hp quickly changes when you factor in the drivetrain lose.
Average drivetrain lose is 15% - 20%
306 - 15% = 260.1
306 - 17% = 254.0
306 - 20% = 244.8
Lets take the mean (middle) of 17%. A Lancer with 220 whp is only down 34 hp. Now factor in the Lexus is 400 pounds heavier. It would be real hard for the Lexus to make up that much ground.
Oh and the IS350 runs a 14.2 with a professional driver. Not a 16 year old kid.
#298
Evolving Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Your numbers are SEVERLY skewed!!!! You are comparing WHP on the Lancer to CHP (crank hp) with the IS350. So your numbers need a reality check.
Not only that, last I checked the 2006 IS350 posted 306 hp.
So that 306 hp quickly changes when you factor in the drivetrain lose.
Average drivetrain lose is 15% - 20%
306 - 15% = 260.1
306 - 17% = 254.0
306 - 20% = 244.8
Lets take the mean (middle) of 17%. A Lancer with 220 whp is only down 34 hp. Now factor in the Lexus is 400 pounds heavier. It would be real hard for the Lexus to make up that much ground.
Oh and the IS350 runs a 14.2 with a professional driver. Not a 16 year old kid.
Not only that, last I checked the 2006 IS350 posted 306 hp.
So that 306 hp quickly changes when you factor in the drivetrain lose.
Average drivetrain lose is 15% - 20%
306 - 15% = 260.1
306 - 17% = 254.0
306 - 20% = 244.8
Lets take the mean (middle) of 17%. A Lancer with 220 whp is only down 34 hp. Now factor in the Lexus is 400 pounds heavier. It would be real hard for the Lexus to make up that much ground.
Oh and the IS350 runs a 14.2 with a professional driver. Not a 16 year old kid.
I really doubt your car is pushing 220whp... that would be a 80whp gain (give or take)... Those are huge numbers for an econo box. I would say you are pushing 200whp as of now and 230hp at the crank. That 400lbs. wouldn't factor in at this hp gap. the general rule of thumb is 100lbs = 1/10 of a sec (give or take). From a stop the IS would take off faster since it has an LSD and reach 2nd/3rd/4th gears faster than you will, since it has the 6-speed close ratio gearbox.
So if you raced a crappy driver than you beat a crappy driver but you didn't beat the IS350. Also unless you are racing on a paved strip with a time board than this is irrelevant. You still didn't post a time. and the IS350 stock runs a 14 flat with a pro driver.
#299
Account Disabled
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, to a point. But we are dealing with a completely new engine and ECU. None of you know how the engine responds to a turbo. Look at the 1000 different kits for a Honda Civic. They all post different results and make the car respond differently. This kit may post 250 whp, it may post 175 whp. No one know right now. So how can you put down a kit and claim as proof of whats in my class??
With the right amount of money, you can make anything work. Again, I never said that it would be plug-n-play.
Really, an IS350 is out of my league? Wonder why I beat one. It all depends on a driver. I have seen a car with 700 hp run 15s. I guess I should have stated that the driver of the IS350 was out of my league.
And what makes you think I am street racing. I never stated that. Maybe, just maybe my uncle owns a private airstrip for his plane and allows us local boys to come out and run.
Really, an IS350 is out of my league? Wonder why I beat one. It all depends on a driver. I have seen a car with 700 hp run 15s. I guess I should have stated that the driver of the IS350 was out of my league.
And what makes you think I am street racing. I never stated that. Maybe, just maybe my uncle owns a private airstrip for his plane and allows us local boys to come out and run.
as far as the IS350 even if you do have a 220 car at the crank which is around what i wuold expect for the 2.0 Turbo, you still have the IS which is 306 and 277tq. the car goes 0-60 in about 5.5 seconds..and lets be honest a turbo lancer isnt getting near that. yes its an extra 400 but that 400 isnt going to give you the advantage having 80+ less hp. if you were doing a drag the 350 only comes in an automatic six speed. so in a drag the driver dosent matter..you mash your foot to the ground and hold it straight so there isnt really any "bad driver" in that case which means either the other driver let you win, or your falsely claiming to beat this car, or you had a kid with downsyndrome driving the IS with paddle shifters shifting horribly.
Amby said it good in the other thread
What do you mean "league"? A Lancer with a turbo kit isn't in the same league as an Evo, sorry but it's not. Sure you might be as fast in a straight line but you don't have the same level of traction, the same handling, the same braking ability, etc. Moreover, all the Evo guy has to do is get a TBE and a tune and you have to spend another 5000$ just to keep up. Mod your car to make you happy, not to be something it's not. A Lancer with a turbo kit can be a really fun car but it's no Evo/STI/IS300.
Last edited by LuDa; Apr 22, 2009 at 12:12 PM.