Notices
Lancer Engine Tech Discuss specs/changes to the engine from cams to fully balanced and blueprinted engines!

exhaust experiment and questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 4, 2004, 12:44 PM
  #1  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
2wenty2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fastlane
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
exhaust experiment and questions

so we recently had to remove our buschur cat back exhaust and put the stock pipe and muffler back on due to some traffic violations. the strange (or maybe not strange and im just a dumb girl) thing is that when we put the smaller stock exhaust pipe and muffler back on the car makes more power than it did with the larger buscher exhaust system

comments suggestions ideas?

would it be better to keep the smaller pipe and just get an axel back muffler to replace the stock?
Old Nov 4, 2004, 12:52 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 2,204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's because you got your scavenging back. With an NA motor the pressure from the cylinders pushes the exhaust out and then the exhaust sucks it out. I don't believe NA exhausts should be larger than 2.25" at the downpipe and the rest should be 2".

There's an article I'll try to find that was written by an exhaust engineer and was posted on impreza.net and mirrored on the suzuki swift forums. He describes how the ideal turbo exhaust would be developed and says in the first paragraph that Na motors need an exhaust that is the exact opposite of what he's going to describe. He says turbo exhaust need to be big and get bigger on the way out to reduce "backpressure" on the cylinders, backpressure slows down the turbo spooling. So he basically says, in ver simplified terms that turbo should look like this: < and NA should look like this > (progressively smaller diameter to promote scavenging).

Like I said, I'm paraphrasing him, but if you search for exhaust posts with my name, you'll see that I've been saying that for a while- and I was a little more articulate in another post.
Old Nov 4, 2004, 01:00 PM
  #3  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
2wenty2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fastlane
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thank you engineer boy thats a perfect answer. how large is the stock piping on the lancer anyways?
Old Nov 4, 2004, 01:59 PM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
03RallyLancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Redneck KY
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1 7/8 i think
Old Nov 4, 2004, 02:38 PM
  #5  
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (8)
 
HobieKopek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Long Island
Posts: 7,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would suggest that you don't trust the butt dyno for gains. If it's not on rollers it's not a credible statement imo.

Again, dyno proven gains across the powerband with the BR cat-back.
Old Nov 4, 2004, 02:57 PM
  #6  
Newbie
 
Metzen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lancer exhaust has got to be smaller than 1 7/8, I upgraded mine to 2 and made a hell of a difference. I think it's actually closer to 1.5 inch diameter. cuz when I hit 3200 RPM, it kicks up a bit and really starts hauling.
Old Nov 4, 2004, 03:04 PM
  #7  
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (4)
 
Danno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: CANADA
Posts: 1,123
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I noticed the same when I did that with my car. I had an AEM CAI and a Cat Back...I took it off and gained power.
Old Nov 16, 2004, 06:14 PM
  #8  
Evolving Member
 
streetspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone know if the buschur or magnaflow exhaust system would produce more hp gain?
Old Nov 16, 2004, 06:42 PM
  #9  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Megadeth2118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Georgia
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It will produce more high end power but lose low end torque if you're NA.
Old Nov 17, 2004, 11:59 AM
  #10  
.L.
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
.L.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: IL
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
when i was NA i noticed the same thing. all i had was a sri and header. when i installed my catback exhaust i noticed i lost some low end. but then again you cant really trust the "butt dyno".
Old Nov 17, 2004, 12:05 PM
  #11  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
lookslikeanevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: ill be home soon
Posts: 3,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
taking off an exhaust will increase the low end a little bit, thus feeling quicker...but your high end will such...it all depends on what you want...i love the sounds of my greddy and its pretty much the only reason why i still have it
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
domyz
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
16
Apr 21, 2011 03:08 PM
S6devil
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules
11
May 16, 2008 11:50 AM
CityKnight
Lancer Engine Tech
28
Jul 26, 2007 10:12 AM
Nemesis3
Evo General
16
May 20, 2006 09:56 AM
chinto
Evo How To Requests / Questions / Tips
25
Oct 28, 2004 09:56 PM



Quick Reply: exhaust experiment and questions



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:15 PM.