Rrm V2 Sri Rocks!
Nov 13, 2008, 10:06 PM
#17
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is there a dyno sheet just with the V2 intake along? I just want to justify the money i will be spending...although i guess you can't really measure the improvement of throttle response.
Nov 13, 2008, 10:17 PM
#18
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
No but I am sure whatever Competitors claim, we are making too. AEM CAI claims 5 h.p. I think they like SRIs better than the CAIs. You end up with a better powerband and response with SRI. That is what we have seen and that is what some customers have reported. They have had both CAI and SRIs to compare.
ROAD/RACE
ROAD/RACE
Nov 14, 2008, 07:43 AM
#19
The header thing happened on early edition of the header. Components used to make it have been changed to longer, stronger ones. IT is not an issue anymore. Anyways, anyone with a problem waas treated fairly including Nosman. Lets move on the product has been resolved. Don't start a panic. Only 4-5 out of 300+ of them did that by the way.
ROAD/RACE
ROAD/RACE
I posted a vid what do you guys think, I have a drive by but I think I might get in trouble with it cuz im zooming down my street not sure If I want to post it 
Nov 14, 2008, 07:46 AM
#20
No but I am sure whatever Competitors claim, we are making too. AEM CAI claims 5 h.p. I think they like SRIs better than the CAIs. You end up with a better powerband and response with SRI. That is what we have seen and that is what some customers have reported. They have had both CAI and SRIs to compare.
ROAD/RACE
ROAD/RACE
Jan 1, 2009, 06:39 PM
#27
Newbie
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just a thought for some who get the v2.
I noticed that the shield wasn't a great fit, bolts were hard to tighten due to being in tight spots. It needed to be bent in places so it wasn't rubbing on other pieces of the engine compartment and it definitely required some massaging to get it decently installed.
After a day I decided the shield wasn't worth the trouble and chucked it. Sounds better now anyways.
Am I satisfied with it? Yeah, for now. It definitely makes a big difference, but a CAI might be a future experiment for me.
I noticed that the shield wasn't a great fit, bolts were hard to tighten due to being in tight spots. It needed to be bent in places so it wasn't rubbing on other pieces of the engine compartment and it definitely required some massaging to get it decently installed.
After a day I decided the shield wasn't worth the trouble and chucked it. Sounds better now anyways.
Am I satisfied with it? Yeah, for now. It definitely makes a big difference, but a CAI might be a future experiment for me.
Jan 1, 2009, 07:35 PM
#28
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
A little massage sounds fine. Heatshield is fine though. It was your preference to remove the heat sheild. Wait till you get your AEM CAI, you will love having to solder longer wires on and such to connect the MAS sensor. AEM really made a unit that requires a ton of MASSAGE! Anyone with AEM CAI should chime in. IT really is a pain in the A$$. We hate intstalling the AEM unit and it is really not worth the extra WORK and MONEY.
ROAD/RACE
ROAD/RACE
Jan 1, 2009, 07:57 PM
#30
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
No one has had an issue with our intake. We both have opinion, that is cool. We have had experience with both intakes though so people need to know the trade offs. That is it. Nothing is absolute, just trade offs.
ROAD/RACE
ROAD/RACE