Notices
Lancer General Come on in and discuss the US Lancer.

2009 Lancer GTS Fuel Economy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 26, 2008, 01:55 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Tommy boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 Lancer GTS Fuel Economy

If you drive a 2009 Lancer Gts automatic with paddle shifters this is a question for you.

Wat avg kms you get with a full tank of gas?

With mostly city driving? With mostly highway driving?

My first tank of gas after driving mostly 95 percent city and the first 150 kms my foot was a bit heavy so i was wasting a bit of gas, i should get about 450 - 480kms.... is that avg?

I know they say that its 10.1 L / 100 km in the city , so that should be 580 kms in the city and 7.1 L / 100 km on the highway, so thats 820kms.
Old Nov 26, 2008, 02:14 PM
  #2  
Newbie
 
rontam90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you are better off posting this in the lancer part of the forums
Old Nov 26, 2008, 02:24 PM
  #3  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
mmartahus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i have a manual 09 GTS and would get 20mpg city and 31mpg highway... I just got slightly wider then stock tires tho and my mileage has gone down significantly, I get about 18mpg city and 27mpg highway now
Old Nov 26, 2008, 02:31 PM
  #4  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
 
ROCK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Love to hear about this. A lot of guys are reporting some improvemnets by modding the engine too. Lets see posts.

ROAD/RACE
Old Nov 26, 2008, 02:39 PM
  #5  
Newbie
 
LancerGirl08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: .
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not sure how one checks the mileage but I can tell you that driving on the highway I can get to Toronto from here (1h45m drive-ish) on a quarter tank of gas.
Old Nov 26, 2008, 06:14 PM
  #6  
Newbie
 
czapski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I drive all day for work city and highway...I'm averaging about 10.2 - 11.2 per 100km
Old Nov 26, 2008, 08:53 PM
  #7  
Evolving Member
 
absolute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
09 manual 2.0L i4

i was at around 10 driving city (about 30% of the time in stop and go traffic)
and 9.2 highway

after my injen cold air intake
8.5 city
7.6 highway

w/ RRM pulley 8.2city and 7.3highway

this is w/o spirited driving
Old Nov 26, 2008, 09:36 PM
  #8  
Newbie
 
rontam90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by absolute
09 manual 2.0L i4

i was at around 10 driving city (about 30% of the time in stop and go traffic)
and 9.2 highway

after my injen cold air intake
8.5 city
7.6 highway

w/ RRM pulley 8.2city and 7.3highway

this is w/o spirited driving
hmm, i've always thought intakes contributed to better mileage - more air vacuumed = more efficient combustion, no? unless more air = more fuel required for combustion but i couldve sworn i read somewhere that intakes yield better mpg.
Old Nov 26, 2008, 09:44 PM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
brads09lancerGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rontam90
hmm, i've always thought intakes contributed to better mileage - more air vacuumed = more efficient combustion, no? unless more air = more fuel required for combustion but i couldve sworn i read somewhere that intakes yield better mpg.
He is getting better mpg. the lower the L/100km the better.
Old Nov 26, 2008, 09:47 PM
  #10  
Newbie
 
rontam90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by brads09lancerGT
He is getting better mpg. the lower the L/100km the better.
oh true. i normally calculate it by KMS / liter in my head, and i thought thats what he was using too
Old Nov 26, 2008, 09:50 PM
  #11  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
brads09lancerGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With my CVT, I'm getting about 540-560kms on a tank of gas before my light comes on. That's with the new K&N typhoon intake. It added about 50 kms to a tank of gas. About 70% of my driving is in the city.
Old Nov 26, 2008, 10:27 PM
  #12  
Evolving Member
 
absolute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
haha yea brad's right it was in L/100km sorry i 4got to specify that
Old Nov 26, 2008, 10:34 PM
  #13  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
brads09lancerGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We'll blame it on being late @ night
Old Nov 27, 2008, 06:38 AM
  #14  
Evolving Member
 
homieG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i get about 600-650 per tank. i have an intake, exhaust, pulley, short shifter and a driver who knows his car! LOL
Old Nov 27, 2008, 07:39 AM
  #15  
Former Sponsor
 
evo_soul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: the land between lancer and evo
Posts: 2,362
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
also keep in mind winter tires will give you up to a 5% performance hit so your fuel economy will suffer. I already see this reflected in my cars MPG


Quick Reply: 2009 Lancer GTS Fuel Economy



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:17 AM.