whos got the fastest NA lancer???
#31
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: THE OC. California
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by ZooRacer
my car is an auto also...but with my mods and weight reductions i have done...i should be able to do low 16's but if i am lucky high 15's...what you guys think....i took out the 2 asorbers in da front bumper....which weighs near 15-20lbs each, cf trunk lid, cf hood, and did a battery relocation to the trunk where my launch is better cause of a lighter engine bay!
so what do u guys think i will be able to do...
my car is an auto also...but with my mods and weight reductions i have done...i should be able to do low 16's but if i am lucky high 15's...what you guys think....i took out the 2 asorbers in da front bumper....which weighs near 15-20lbs each, cf trunk lid, cf hood, and did a battery relocation to the trunk where my launch is better cause of a lighter engine bay!
so what do u guys think i will be able to do...
#36
Evolved Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: TB, FL
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Iamkar33m
I believe the Manual can run low 17's and Auto's run mid-high 17's
I believe the Manual can run low 17's and Auto's run mid-high 17's
Has anyone seen an auto LS run?
On average stocker, manual is mid 17's and auto around mid to low 18's. Then again, there are always people cheating by taking off R/T on their final ETA. Those are the people who won't admit their deeds.
As for the G-tech, it is always faster, not slower. People cheat on that too by fudging the weight equation by putting Gross Vehicle Weight. If it's too light, it will show slower time. Then again, there are those people who will swear up and down it's the best thing right next to running a real track, completely accurate. Go figure.
See I have shown two ways people can fudge their result, making themselves look good in front of others. It's up to the individual to those possible skewed data or not.
#37
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Jackson, CA (NorCal, Sacramento)
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
why would people take off their R/T from their E/T??? i dont get it. your R/T has NOTHING to do with your E/T because the time doesnt even start till you break the light beam. and i also have the G-tech but i dont have it totally accurate yet, so i dont post anything from that.
#38
Evolving Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
as for auto lancers, i beleive a stock would run a mid to high 18. thats about what mine ran. i took it down to the track, and i ran a 17.71.. i was getting faster, but i stopped. i have a GReddy cat-back, Injen SRI, A'Pexi SAFC, thats all for performance. i need to get faster.
#39
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ill be heading out tomorrow without the test pipe in, ran 16.7 before so we will see what the new time is. As for petey pab saying that stock lancers run 16.9 I have never seen a stock lancer anywhere close to that. Last weekend when i ran there was a chic out there who I know can drive better than me, and she ran 17.4. I will be gunning for that 15 sec mark we will see ill post up tomorrow night.
Ryan
Ryan
#40
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Jackson, CA (NorCal, Sacramento)
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
damn, i dunno? i just read that in motor trend, and from all my experiences i thought that was right. when i was basically stock (just a muffler) i was runnin 16.7's. good luck tho, cause i would think you would be runnin way faster than me. just work on your launches cause i think thats where your problems are. or maybe your clutch could be burned? have it checked out.
#41
Originally posted by petey pab
damn, i dunno? i just read that in motor trend, and from all my experiences i thought that was right. when i was basically stock (just a muffler) i was runnin 16.7's. good luck tho, cause i would think you would be runnin way faster than me. just work on your launches cause i think thats where your problems are. or maybe your clutch could be burned? have it checked out.
damn, i dunno? i just read that in motor trend, and from all my experiences i thought that was right. when i was basically stock (just a muffler) i was runnin 16.7's. good luck tho, cause i would think you would be runnin way faster than me. just work on your launches cause i think thats where your problems are. or maybe your clutch could be burned? have it checked out.
See if I can get the RA to be in the 15's with just CAI and exhaust. Mid 15's hopefully. Never been to the track so probably not but we'll see.
#42
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Jackson, CA (NorCal, Sacramento)
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by MitsuLancer04
See you on Wednesday Pab?
See if I can get the RA to be in the 15's with just CAI and exhaust. Mid 15's hopefully. Never been to the track so probably not but we'll see.
See you on Wednesday Pab?
See if I can get the RA to be in the 15's with just CAI and exhaust. Mid 15's hopefully. Never been to the track so probably not but we'll see.
#43
Evolved Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: TB, FL
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by petey pab
why would people take off their R/T from their E/T??? i dont get it.
why would people take off their R/T from their E/T??? i dont get it.
Example: someone runs a 18.3 w/ an RT of 1.5 sec. Mistake or no mistake: a 16.8 looks a lot better than 18.3 sec. Thereby, gaining cool pts amongst their peers.
#45
Evolved Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bahamut, I don't know what track you've been to, but at professional tracks you're reaction time is not included in your quater mile time. Butt it can cause you to loose. ex: you run a 15.5 with a reaction of .6 and a dial in of 15.1, the guy next to you runs a 15.2 with a 1.2 reaction and a dial in of 15.0, you win.