Fastest N/A Lancer
Jun 25, 2004, 08:51 AM
#17
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Heres my slip. This is when all I had was a home made SRI.
16.7
http://s6.invisionfree.com/AZLC/index.php?showtopic=77
16.7
http://s6.invisionfree.com/AZLC/index.php?showtopic=77
Sep 1, 2004, 06:37 PM
#19
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Mass
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I hit a flat 16sec @ 86.9mph with a .607 rection time at Lebenon Valley Dragway.
- RRM throttle body, RMR intake, K&N intake, reflashed ECU, RMR axle back exhaust, test pipe, high flow cat, short shifter, 93 octane with STP gas treatment booster, on stock rims and tires, no spare or system in.
It was in the 70's out so the engine was breathing nicely. And it has time to cool down a bit from the drive.
Dont have the slip here at work, but ill look for it later at home.
Honest man. I dont think these numbers are accurate at all either because I ran a 16.6 and 16.5 at another track with the same mods and weather
. The track that shot out the other number has wierd elevations that cause lots of issues with the cars (iddling, and whatever) and they have been know for "innacurate numbers" at times 
. All I know is that its slow, but looks nice! Hahaha 
- RRM throttle body, RMR intake, K&N intake, reflashed ECU, RMR axle back exhaust, test pipe, high flow cat, short shifter, 93 octane with STP gas treatment booster, on stock rims and tires, no spare or system in.
It was in the 70's out so the engine was breathing nicely. And it has time to cool down a bit from the drive.
Dont have the slip here at work, but ill look for it later at home.
Honest man. I dont think these numbers are accurate at all either because I ran a 16.6 and 16.5 at another track with the same mods and weather
. The track that shot out the other number has wierd elevations that cause lots of issues with the cars (iddling, and whatever) and they have been know for "innacurate numbers" at times . All I know is that its slow, but looks nice! Hahaha
Last edited by Blacksheepdj; Apr 23, 2005 at 08:02 AM.
Sep 2, 2004, 08:30 AM
#20
Originally Posted by urbanknight
I don't think you guys read my above post, I had to delete 2 more posts in 1 day. In this thread, post TIME SLIPS ONLY. Anything (I mean anything) else will be deleted. Post ALL comments here https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...2&page=1&pp=15 PLEEEEEAAAAAAASSE
Sep 12, 2004, 04:30 PM
#21
Evolving Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I will add the slip if I can find it
but ... I have a 03 ES and my buddy has an 04 Ralliart.
I ran three times, all between 17.0 and 17.2 seconds. My friend ran 16 flat... our first time at the track for both of us. My bro with his 04 Echo hatch ran just 0.2 sec worse than me! All cars standard 5spd and all of our cars are 100% stock, no mods whatsoever.
These runs are with 1/4 to 1/2 tank of gas, nothing removed or stripped from the car, and regular 87 octane fuel. My buddy's tires were extremely bald and needed an oil change badly, so maybe he could have gotten a better time I don't know. 17 was about as good as I expected out of my ES. :P Although it would have been nice to be under 17.. lol.
but ... I have a 03 ES and my buddy has an 04 Ralliart.
I ran three times, all between 17.0 and 17.2 seconds. My friend ran 16 flat... our first time at the track for both of us. My bro with his 04 Echo hatch ran just 0.2 sec worse than me! All cars standard 5spd and all of our cars are 100% stock, no mods whatsoever.
These runs are with 1/4 to 1/2 tank of gas, nothing removed or stripped from the car, and regular 87 octane fuel. My buddy's tires were extremely bald and needed an oil change badly, so maybe he could have gotten a better time I don't know. 17 was about as good as I expected out of my ES. :P Although it would have been nice to be under 17.. lol.
Oct 10, 2004, 06:04 PM
#22
Newbie
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On the track I ran a 15.972 @ 88 MPH, on a warm Phoenix night. I want to run in the winter to see if there's a difference...oh...I was running 89 octane gas. Sorry no time slip. I'll just go run again and post the slip in a few days.
Oct 12, 2004, 05:12 PM
#24
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RarStlzLncr
On the track I ran a 15.972 @ 88 MPH, on a warm Phoenix night. I want to run in the winter to see if there's a difference...oh...I was running 89 octane gas. Sorry no time slip. I'll just go run again and post the slip in a few days.
Dec 10, 2004, 12:54 PM
#25
tonloc, that's fine, but until then post everything else related to this here https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...5&pagenumber=1
that's the thread for everything else pertaining to the fastest lancer except time slips. This thread is for times ONLY. It's kinda like a how-to thread, there's usually the how-to, and then the discussion thread related to it. We posted the discussion thread link in page one, but nobody's using it. USE IT
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...5&pagenumber=1
that's the thread for everything else pertaining to the fastest lancer except time slips. This thread is for times ONLY. It's kinda like a how-to thread, there's usually the how-to, and then the discussion thread related to it. We posted the discussion thread link in page one, but nobody's using it. USE IT
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...5&pagenumber=1
Dec 10, 2004, 10:44 PM
#26
sorry, here's the full link.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...2&page=1&pp=15
edit: if you are asking what time tonloc posted... he didn't. I didn't delete any posts with times (even if they are questionable) tonloc simply called BS on someone else and talked about his ***** size or something like that.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...2&page=1&pp=15
edit: if you are asking what time tonloc posted... he didn't. I didn't delete any posts with times (even if they are questionable) tonloc simply called BS on someone else and talked about his ***** size or something like that.
Mar 30, 2005, 05:19 AM
#28
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The quickest time I ran last night was a 17.162. The car had a full tank of gas (damn I'm stupid). It's a 5spd 02 Lancer ES. My first time on a track. The only "mod" I have is a fart cannon muffler.
Apr 10, 2005, 07:12 AM
#30
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 1,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Your 60 is bad but look at the MPH 
That's nearly 2mph faster than me.
When I made improvements like that my E'ts fell by nearly .2-.4 secs
Give it some practice.
WADAD
And I'll add that in the 1/8 my speeds are near 66.5-66.9 mph. You were much slower there but picked up alot of mph at the back half of the track. Proof I guess that the IM is working in the higher rpms.
That's nearly 2mph faster than me.When I made improvements like that my E'ts fell by nearly .2-.4 secs
Give it some practice.
WADAD
And I'll add that in the 1/8 my speeds are near 66.5-66.9 mph. You were much slower there but picked up alot of mph at the back half of the track. Proof I guess that the IM is working in the higher rpms.
Last edited by WADADLIG_OZ; Apr 10, 2005 at 07:14 AM.